UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Amendment No.    )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material under§240.14a-12

Tejon Ranch Co.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 No fee required
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11
 (1)  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 (4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 (5)  

Total fee paid:

 

     

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)  

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

 (2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 (3)  

Filing Party:

 

     

 (4)  

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


LOGO


4436 Lebec Rd.

Post Office Box 1000

Tejon Ranch, California 93243

March 31, 2020April 2, 2021

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Tejon Ranch Co. (the “Company”) on Wednesday, May 20, 2020,19, 2021, at 9:00 A.M., Pacific Time, online via a live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021 (the “Annual Meeting”). Information and procedures to follow on how to participate in the Hyatt Regency Newport Beach, 1107 Jamboree Road, Newport Beach, California 92660.Annual Meeting are included in the 2021 proxy materials and will be disclosed on the Annual Meeting website. Your Board of Directors and management look forward to greeting those shareholders who are able to attend. If you are planning to attend the meeting in person, you will need to present proof that you own shares of the Company, such as government-issued photo identification and a proxy card or voting instruction form with your name on it.online.

The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, which contain information concerning the business to be transacted at the meeting, appear in the following pages.

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting, whether or not you plan to attend.attend online. Please review the proxy statement and vote ononline, by telephone, or by mailing the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form at your earliest convenience.

Your interest and participation in the affairs of the Company are greatly appreciated.

 

Sincerely,
Gregory S. Bielli,
President and Chief Executive Officer


TEJON RANCH CO.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

on

May 20, 202019, 2021

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Tejon Ranch Co. (the “Company”, “Tejon”, “we”, “us”, “our” or words of similar import in this Proxy Statement) will be held online via a live webcast at the Hyatt Regency Newport Beach, 1107 Jamboree Road, Newport Beach, California, 92660www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021 on Wednesday, May 20, 2020,19, 2021, at 9:00 A.M., Pacific Time (the “Annual Meeting”), for the following purposes:

 

 1.

To elect the three directors named in this Proxy Statement.

 

 2.

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.2021.

 

 3.

To approve named executive officer compensation on an advisory basis.

 

 4.

To approve the following amendmentsan amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation:

a.

To declassifyIncorporation (as amended, the Board“Certificate of Directors and provide forIncorporation”) to increase the annual electionnumber of all directors, beginning at the 2023 Annual Meeting;

b.

To remove the provisions on the submissionauthorized shares of nominations and other business at shareholder meetings, which would be governed exclusively by the Company’s Bylaws; and

c.

To make variousnon-substantive changes to the Certificate of Incorporation.common stock.

 

 5.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The nominees of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) for election at the meeting are Gregory S. Bielli, AnthonyJean Fuller, Geoffrey L. LeggioStack, and Norman J. Metcalfe.Michael H. Winer.

The Board recommends that you vote: (i) “FOR” the election of each of the nominees; (ii) “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP; and (iii) “FOR” the approval of named executive

officer compensation; and (iv) “FOR” each of the amendmentsamendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation.Incorporation

The Board has fixed the close of business on March 25, 202024, 2021 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.meeting or the adjournment thereof.

We arecontinue to actively monitoringmonitor the public health and travel safety concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the advisories or mandates that federal, state, and local governments, and related agencies, may issue. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting as currently planned,As a result of these uncertainties, we have determined for 2021 that we will announce any additionalonce again hold a virtual meeting instead of an in-person meeting. To attend the Annual Meeting online, vote, view the stockholder list, or alternative arrangements forsubmit questions, shareholders of record will need to go to the Annual Meeting website noted above and log in using their 16-digit control number provided on their proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”). For more information about the virtual-only meeting which may include a change in venue or holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor our Investor Relations website at http://ir.tejonranch.com/investor-overviewformat and our filings with the SEC for updated information. Ifyour ability to participate and vote, including if you are planning to attend our meeting, please check our websitea beneficial holder of your shares, see the week ofdiscussion under “Record Date and Voting“ in the meeting.accompany proxy statement. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.

Your attention is directed to the accompanying Proxy Statement. To ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting, please date, sign, and mail the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, for which a return envelope is provided, or vote your proxy by telephone or the Internet, the instructions for which are provided on the enclosed proxy card.card, Notice or voting instruction form.

In the event of a technical malfunction or other situation that the meeting chair determines may affect the ability of the meeting to satisfy the requirements for a meeting of shareholders to be held by means of remote communication under the Delaware General Corporation Law, or that otherwise makes it advisable to adjourn the meeting, the chair of the meeting will convene the meeting at [9:30 a.m. Pacific Time] on the date specified above and at the Company’s address specified above solely for the purpose of adjourning the meeting to reconvene at a date, time and physical or virtual location announced by the meeting chair. Under either of the foregoing circumstances, we will post information regarding the announcement on the investors page of the Company’s website at http://ir.tejonranch.com/investor-overview

Please note that if your shares are held by a broker, bank, or other holder of record, your broker, bank, or other holder of record will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to Proposal 1, or Proposal 3, or Proposals 4(a), (b) or (c)Proposal 4 unless you provide them with directions on how to vote. We strongly encourage you to return the voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, or other holder of record or to utilize your broker’s telephone or Internet voting, if available, and exercise your right to vote as a shareholder.

 

For the Board of Directors,

NORMAN J. METCALFE,

    Chairman of the Board

ALLEN E. LYDA, Chief Operating

    Officer, Assistant Secretary

Tejon Ranch, California

April 6, 20202, 2021

PLEASE MARK YOUR INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY, SIGN AND DATE THE PROXY, AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE. ALTERNATIVELY, PLEASE VOTE YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET.

PLEASE VOTE YOUR PROXYSHARES EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.MEETING ONLINE. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING ONLINE AND WISH TO DO SO, YOU MAY VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSONDURING THE MEETING EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED YOUR PROXY.


 

20202021  

Notice of

Annual Meeting of

Shareholders

and Proxy

Statement

 

 

 


Table of Contents of the Proxy Statement

 

Solicitation of Proxies

   1 

Record Date and Voting

   1 

Proposal No. 1   The Election of Directors

   7 

Proposal No. 2   The Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   8 

Proposal No. 3   Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

   10 

Proposal No. 4   AmendmentsAmendment to Certificate of Incorporation

   1211 

Board of Directors

   1713 

Corporate Governance Matters

   2218 

Committees of the Board

   2319 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

   2622 

Succession Planning

   2622 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

   2622 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   2824

Pay Ratio Disclosure

56

Hedging and Pledging

56 

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

   6657 

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

   6859 

Other Matters

   69

Annex 1 – Proposed Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation

7260 

Appendix A Attachment A to Corporate Governance Guidelines

   A-1 


TEJON RANCH CO.

Post Office Box 1000

Tejon Ranch, California 93243

PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May 20, 202019, 2021

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

To Be Held on May 20, 202019, 2021

The Proxy Statement and accompanying Annual Report to Shareholders and Annual Report on

Form 10-K are available at www.tejonranch.com or at http://materials.proxyvote.com/879080

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held online via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021 on Wednesday, May 20, 202019, 2021, at 9:00 A.M., Pacific Time (the “2020“2021 Annual Meeting”).

It is anticipated that the mailing of this Proxy Statement, and accompanying form of Proxy and Notice of Internet Availabilty (the “Notice”) to shareholders will begin on or about April 6, 2020.2, 2021.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

At the meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be asked to vote on the following matters: (1) the election of the three directors named in this Proxy Statement, (2) the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020,2021, (3) an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, (4) amendmentsan amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, and (5) such other business as may properly come before the meeting. The Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is asking for your proxy for use at the 20202021 Annual Meeting. Although management does not know of any other matter to be acted upon at the meeting, shares represented by valid proxies will be voted by the persons named on the proxy in accordance with their best judgment with respect to any other matters which may properly come before the meeting.

The costs for this proxy solicitation will be paid by the Company. Following the mailing of this Proxy Statement, directors, officers, and regular employees of the Company may solicit proxies by mail, telephone,e-mail, or in person: such persons will receive no additional compensation for such services. Brokerage houses and other nominees, fiduciaries and custodians nominally holding shares of record will be requested to forward proxy soliciting material to the beneficial owners of such shares and will be reimbursed by the Company for their charges and expenses in connection therewith at the rates approved by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

RECORD DATE AND VOTING

General Information

We continue to actively monitor the public health and travel safety concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the advisories or mandates that federal, state, and local governments, and related agencies, may issue. As a result of these uncertainties, we have determined for 2021 that we will once again hold a virtual meeting instead of an in-person meeting. We have endeavored to provide shareholders with the same rights and opportunities for participation in the Annual Meeting online as an in-person meeting.

Holders of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.50 (the ���Common“Common Stock”), of record at the close of business on March 25, 202024, 2021 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, and participate in, the meeting. To participate in the Annual Meeting, including to vote, ask questions, and view the list of registered shareholders as of the record date during the Annual Meeting, shareholders of record should go to the meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021, enter the 16-digit control number found on their proxy card or Notice, and follow the instructions on the website. If your shares are held in street name and your voting instruction form or Notice indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.proxyvote.com website, then you may access, participate in, and vote at the Annual Meeting with the 16-digit access code indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice. Otherwise, shareholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least 5 days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to attend, participate in or vote at the Annual Meeting.

Online check-in will begin at [8:45] A.M. Pacific Time on May 19, 2021, and the Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 A.M. Pacific Time. You are encouraged to allow sufficient time for accessing the Annual Meeting website. Technicians will be available to assist with technical difficulties and may be reached [via the toll free number available on the Annual Meeting website for such assistance][ by calling [phone number] (U.S.) or [phone number] (International)].

The rules of conduct and procedures for the Annual Meeting will be provided [in advance of and] during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021. The rules of conduct will contain more information regarding the Q&A process, including the number and types of questions permitted, the time allotted for questions, and how questions will be recognized, answered and disclosed. Shareholders may submit questions before and during the Annual Meeting at the Annual Meeting website. We plan to answer questions pertinent to Company matters as time allows during the meeting. Questions that are substantially similar may be grouped and answered once to avoid repetition. Shareholder questions related to personal or customer related matters, that are not pertinent to Annual Meeting matters, or that contain derogatory references to individuals, use offensive language, or are otherwise out of order or not suitable for the conduct of the Annual Meeting will not be addressed during the meeting. If a question is not able to be answered due to time constraints, shareholders are encouraged to contact our Investor Relations department.

There were 26,212,990[                 ] shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held as of the Record Date on all matters presented at the 20202021 Annual Meeting other than the election of directors. Each shareholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the meeting on his or her behalf. A shareholder of record giving a proxy may revoke it at

any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Company’s Secretary a written notice of revocation, or by submitting a later-dated proxy via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail.mail, or by voting via the Internet at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Unless a proxy is revoked, shares represented by a proxy will be voted in accordance with the voting instructions on the proxy, and on matters for which no voting instructions are given, shares will be voted “FOR” the election of each nominee and “FOR” Proposals 2, 3 and 3.4 and in accordance with their best judgment with respect to any other matters which may properly come before the meeting. If you hold shares in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you must follow the instructions of your broker, bank, or other holder of record to change or revoke your voting instructions.

BrokerNon-Votes

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered to be the “beneficial owner” of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct your broker, bank, or other holder of record how to vote your shares. If you do not provide instructions, your broker, bank, or other holder of record will not have the discretion to vote with respect to certain matters, and your shares will constitute “brokernon-votes” with respect to those matters. A “brokernon-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does

not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Specifically, your broker, bank, or other holder of record will not have the discretion to vote with respect to Proposal 1, or Proposal 3, or Proposals 4(a), (b) or (c),Proposal 4, but will have discretion to vote on Proposal 2. Therefore, we strongly encourage you to follow the voting instructions on the materials you receive and vote your shares.

Quorum

The holders of record of a majority of the Common Stock entitled to vote at the 20202021 Annual Meeting must be present at the 20202021 Annual Meeting, either in person via the live webcast or by proxy, in order for there to be a quorum at the 20202021 Annual Meeting. Shares of Common Stock with respect to which the holders are present in person at the 20202021 Annual Meeting, but not voting, and shares of Common Stock for which we have received proxies, but with respect to which the holders of the shares have abstained from voting, will be counted as present at the 20202021 Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether or not a quorum exists. Brokernon-votes will also be counted as present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists. Shareholders cannot abstain in the election of directors, but they can withhold authority. Shareholders who withhold authority will be considered present for purposes of determining a quorum.

Voting Requirements

For Proposal 1 (election of directors), the three (3) candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative votes at the 20202021 Annual Meeting (also referred to as a plurality) will be elected as directors. Shareholders will be able to cumulate their vote in the election of directors. Cumulative voting means that each shareholder is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares he or she holds. These votes may be cast for one nominee or distributed among two or more nominees. To exercise the right to cumulate votes, a shareholder must provide written instructions on the proxy card stating how the shareholder wishes to have his or her votes distributed. Withheld votes and brokernon-votes will not be counted as participating in the voting and will therefore have no effect for purposes of Proposal 1.

Approval of Proposal 2 (the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm) will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in personat the 2021 Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the 20202021 Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be counted as present and will thus have the effect of a vote against Proposal 2.

Approval of Proposal 3 (the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation) will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in personat the 2021 Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the 20202021 Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be counted as present and will thus

have the effect of a vote against Proposal 3. Brokernon-votes will not be counted as participating in the voting and will therefore have no effect for purposes of Proposal 3.

Approval of the amendmentsProposal 4 (the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, which are being presented separately as Proposals 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c),Incorporation) will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Abstentions and brokernon-votes represent outstanding shares and will thus have the effect of a vote against each of Proposals 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c). Proposal 4(c) is conditioned on the approval of both Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b). Therefore, unless shareholders approve both Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b), Proposal 4(c) will fail, even if it receives enough affirmative votes to pass independently. Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b) are not conditioned on the approval of each other. Accordingly, each of Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b) will pass if it independently receives enough affirmative votes.4.

Pursuant to Delaware corporate law, the actions contemplated to be taken at the 20202021 Annual Meeting do not create appraisal or dissenters’ rights.

Proxy Summary

20192020 Performance Highlights

In determining the 2019 compensation for our named executive officers (“NEOs”), the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) considered each NEO’s contributions to the Company’s strategy related to revenue generation, cash management, continued expansion of the Tejon Ranch Commerce Center (“TRCC”) and continued movement of our residential development projects through the entitlement and litigation process within California. The Compensation Committee considered these items with a particular emphasis on the following areas:

Our Mission and Objectives

We are a diversified real estate development and agribusiness company committed to responsibly using our land and resources to meet the housing, employment, and lifestyle needs of Californians and create value for our shareholders. Currently operations consist of land planning and entitlement, land development, commercial land sales and leasing, leasing of land for mineral royalties, water asset management and sales, grazing leases, farming, and ranch operations.

Our primary business objective is to maximize long-term shareholder value through the monetization of our land-based assets. A key element of our strategy is to entitle and then develop large-scalemixed-use master planned residential and commercial/industrial real estate projects to serve the growing populations of Southern and Central California. Ourmixed-use master planned residential developments have received governmental jurisdictional approvals to collectively include up to 34,78335,278 housing units, and more than 35 million square feet of commercial space.

 

 

  Executing on our Strategy—2019 Company Highlights

•  On April 30, 2019, the Company received final approval of its Centennialmixed-use residential community upon completion of the finding of facts and the adoption of other resolutions by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. This also includes a Development Agreement between Los Angeles County and Centennial, which provides the Company with vested rights to build the project as approved for 30 years. With this approval, Centennial at Tejon Ranch achieved local legislative approval for the building of 19,333 residential units and more than 10.1 million square feet of commercial space.

•  In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company’sTRC-MRC 3 joint venture, a partnership with Majestic Realty Co. for the development, construction, leasing and management of

a 579,040 square foot industrial building on the Company’s property at TRCC-East, completed construction of the building and will deliver space to a tenant that has entered into a lease agreement occupying 67% of the total rentable space.

•  The Company also completed the shell and core of a new 4,900 square foot multi-tenant retail building at TRCC-East in the fourth quarter of 2019 to further expand its footprint at TRCC. In December 2019, the Company contributed this multi-tenant building and underlying land to our joint venture with TravelCenters of America, and received cash distribution from the joint venture for $2,805,000 as our contribution value.

•  On December 10, 2019, the Kern County Board of Supervisors reviewed the supplementalre-circulated EIR prepared in response to a court ruling and unanimously reapproved the development of Grapevine, along with a Development Agreement.

  20192020 Operational and Financial Results

 

 

•  For 2019,2020, net incomeloss attributable to common shareholders was $10,580,000,$740,000, representing net incomeloss per share diluted of $0.40,$0.03, compared with net income attributable to common shareholders of $4,255,000,$10,580,000, or $0.16,$0.40, for fiscal 2018.2019.

•  Revenues and other income, including equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, were $44,549,000 in fiscal 2020, a decline of $22,788,000, or 34%, compared to $67,337,000 in 2019. We also saw a $12,071,000 decrease in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, which was primarily attributable to a $9,121,000 decrease in revenue generated by Five West Parcel, LLC as a result of its land and building asset being sold in 2019, along with a $3,088,000 decline in our share of earnings from our TA/Petro joint venture driven by declines in volume and fuel margins as a result of COVID-19 and California’s stay at home orders. Commercial/industrial segment revenues declined $7,256,000. The decline is primarily attributed to the fact that in 2019 there were several major real estate asset contributions and sales made by the Company to its joint ventures for $6,621,000 that did not occur in 2020. Farming revenues saw a $5,465,000 decrease in revenue as a result of lower almond prices, reduced pistachio bonus payments and production, as well as reduced grape revenues due to a lower number of acres in production. These declines in revenue were partially offset by improved mineral resources revenues of $945,000 as a result of water sales increasing $1,912,000 over the prior year as a result of improved sales driven by a dry water year in California. Offsetting this increase was a significant decline in oil royalty revenue as production declined due to lower prices that reduced our production levels. Please refer to our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details regarding our 2020 operations. See the following chart for a summary of revenues:

 

• Revenues and other income, including equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, were $67,337,000 in fiscal 2019, an increase of $16,540,000, or 30%, compared with $50,797,000 in 2018. We also saw a $12,741,000 increase in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, which was primarily attributable to an $8,730,000 increase generated by Five West Parcel, LLC from the gain recognized on disposition of its building and land, along with a $3,007,000 increase in our share of earnings from our TA/Petro joint venture driven by improved fuel margins. Commercial/industrial segment revenues increased $7,822,000, or 87.2%, from $8,970,000 in 2018 to $16,792,000. The increase was primarily attributable to improved land sale revenues of $6,621,000 recognized from two land and building contributions to the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures during 2019. These improvements were offset by reduced mineral resources revenues of $4,604,000 resulting from a lack of water sales opportunities as a result of the wet 2019 winter rain season. Please refer to our 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K for additional details regarding our 2019 operations. See the following chart for a summary of revenues:

   

          
  2019   2018   2020   2019 
Total operating revenues  $49,523,000   $45,619,000   $37,830,000   $49,523,000 
Investment income   1,239,000    1,344,000    884,000    1,239,000 
Gain on sale of real estate   1,331,000    0 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net   16,575,000    3,834,000    4,504,000    16,575,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Revenue and Other Income

  $

 

67,337,000

 

 

 

  $

 

50,797,000

 

 

 

  $

 

44,549,000

 

 

 

  $

 

67,337,000

 

 

 

Forward Looking StatementForward-Looking Statements and Website References

This document contains “forward-looking statements”—that is, statements related to future events that by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. We use words such as anticipates, believes, expects, future, intends, and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and are subject to assumptions and involve known risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance, or achievement of the Company, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance, or achievement imposed by such forward-looking statements.

For details on the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual future results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements, see the “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections in our annual report on Form10-K and quarterly reports on Form10-Q. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements. This document also includes certain forward-looking projected financial information that is based on current estimates and forecasts. Actual results could differ materially. Website references throughout this document are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites is not incorporated by reference into this document.

20192020 Compensation Summary

In determining the 2020 compensation for our named executive officers (“NEOs”), the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) considered each NEO’s contributions to the Company’s strategy related to revenue generation, cash management, continued expansion of the Tejon Ranch Commerce Center (“TRCC”) and continued movement of our residential development projects through the entitlement, permitting, and litigation process within California.

Our 20192020 compensation program reflects ourpay-for-performance philosophy. The annual short-term incentives paid to all our executives were abovebelow target, ranging from 113%-119%89% to 86% of target. Adjusted EBITDA and total revenue and other income,one of the metrics used for purposes of our annual short-term incentives, improved significantlydeclined from the previous year due to the improvementsreductions in revenueoperations as described above.

For the 2017-20192018 to 2020 three-year milestone grants, the goal for cumulative cash from operations was $28,251,000,$32,727,000, and goal achievement was 175.62%175.58% of the target objective, with actual cash from operations of $49,615,000$57,461,000 (without any adjustments to mitigate the impact of COVID-19) over the three-year measurement period. These grants vested at maximum achievement level and were delivered in March 20202021 after approval by the Compensation Committee.

2017-2019 realized payThe target mix of total direct compensation elements for our CEO was 3% above payand NEOs, as discloseda percentage of total compensation, is set forth in the Summary Compensation Tableschart below. We show a three-year period to account for suchthe granting of project milestone equity performance grants that occurs once every three years primarily due to a 2016 supplemental performance grant vesting at the end of 2019. This supplemental performance grant is not includedand occurred in the 2017-2019 summary compensation table pay. Excluding the 2016 supplemental performance grant vesting, the 2017-2019 realized pay would be 15% below the comparable 2017-2019 summary compensation table pay. This difference reflects the decrease in stock value realized over the period and the design2020. A significant percentage of our compensation programs that emphasize long-term awards.

is delivered through variable cash and equity, with over 50% of our CEOs target compensation provided through equity incentives.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Shareholder Engagement

Shareholder engagement is an important and valuable means for direct input and feedback from our investors, and our directors and management recognize the benefits that come from this dialogue. We engage with shareholders throughout the year in order to:

 

Provide visibility and transparency into our business, key real estate entitlement milestones, and our performance;

 

Discuss with shareholders and prospective shareholders the issues that are important to them and hear their expectations; and

 

Assess emerging issues that may affect our business, inform our decision making, and help shape our practices.

We create many opportunities for shareholders and prospective shareholders to provide feedback to our Board and management by setting upone-on-one meetings and telephone calls. In 2019,2020, we met with investors representing over 40%30% of shares outstanding. The primary feedback that we received related to our business plans and compensation programs is summarized below. The input was similar to the feedback last year given our continued push forward toward the development of our land assets. As part of our process to respond to shareholder feedback and evaluate adjustmentsany comments related to our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee hiredworks with compensation consultant Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC or(“Semler Brossy”). In 2019 and 2020, Semler Brossy as our new compensation consultant in late 2018. During 2019, Semler Brossy worked withand the Compensation Committee to evaluateevaluated the Company’s compensation programs. The outcome of this evaluation was aprograms, which resulted in the realignment of long-term milestone performance grants beginning in 2020 to include grants that are tied to growth in our stock price.

 

 

What We Heard

 

  

 

How We Responded

 

Shareholders want a better understanding of our business model as related to our real estate segments, and in particular, the process of entitlement

  

Management evaluated past disclosures and, for the 20192020 Annual Report on Form10-K and in this report, continued to expand our disclosures related to our land entitlement and development programs

 

 

Shareholders favor the addition of total stock return measurements into performance-based equity programs

  

 

The Compensation Committee, with advice from our new compensation consultant, developed a new stock grant program that includes total stock return as a component of each NEO’s performance-based equity grants beginning in 2020

 

 

Shareholders had concerns about annual cash incentive plan financial metrics being compared to budget rather than prior year financial metrics

  

 

Enhancement of disclosuresDisclosures were enhanced to better illustrate the strategic alignment of the budget, which is tied to the current commodity-price environment

 

PROPOSAL 1

THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently consists of eightnine directors divided into three classes based upon when their terms expire. The terms of three current directors (Class I) will expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting; the terms of twothree current directors (Class II) will expire at the 2022 Annual Meeting; and the terms of three current directors (Class III) will expire at the 2023 Annual Meeting. In connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders approved amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board over a period of three years. As a result, each director elected at the 2021 Annual Meeting will be elected for a two-year term. Next year, directors elected at the 2022 Annual Meeting will be elected for a one-year term. Beginning with the 2023 Annual Meeting, all directors will be subject to annual election for one-year terms.

The nominees of the Board for election at the 2021 Annual Meeting to serve as Class I Directors are Jean Fuller, Geoffrey L. Stack and Michael H. Winer, and all three are presently directors whose terms began at the 2018 Annual Meeting. TheIf elected, the regular term of each director expireswill expire at the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at which that director was elected, so that each director serves a three-year term,2023 Annual Meeting, and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, or removal, unless the authorized number of directors is decreased.

The nominees of the Board for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting to serve as Class III Directors are Gregory S. Bielli, Anthony L. Leggio and Norman J. Metcalfe, and all three are presently directors whose terms began at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Shareholder nominations of persons for election to the Board must be made pursuant to timely written notice to the Secretary of the Company pursuant to, and contain the information required by, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. See “Shareholder Proposals for 20212022 Annual Meeting” for additional information on the procedure for shareholder nominations.

Except as noted below, each proxy solicited by and on behalf of the Board will be voted “FOR” the election of the nominees named above (unless such authority is withheld, as provided in the proxy), and unless otherwise instructed,one-halfone-third of the votes to which the shareholder is entitled will be cast for each of the nominees. All of the nominees of the Board have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. In the event that any one or more of the nominees shall become unable to serve or for good cause refuses to serve as director (an event that is not anticipated), the proxy holders will vote for substitute nominees in their discretion. If one or more persons other than those named below as nominees for the 20202021 Annual Meeting are nominated as candidates for director by persons other than the Board, the enclosed proxy may be voted in favor of any one or more of said nominees of the Board and in such order of preference as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion.

Brokers do not have discretion to vote on this proposal without your instruction. Therefore, if you are a beneficial owner and you do not instruct your broker how to vote on this proposal, your shares will not be voted on this proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE

NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE FOR ELECTION AS A DIRECTOR.

PROPOSAL 2

THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

On March 9, 2020,2, 2021, the Audit Committee selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.2021. Services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by Deloitte in fiscal year 20192020 are described under “Audit Fees” below. Additional information regarding the Audit Committee is provided in the Report of the Audit Committee below.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the 20202021 Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

Shareholder Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the appointment may be reconsidered by the Audit Committee and the Board. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Audit Fees and Services

 

  2019*   2018* 

Audit Fees

  

$

496,898

 

  

$

676,725

 

Audit Related Fees

  

$

0

 

  

$

0

 

Tax Fees

  

$

125,700

 

  

$

86,653

 

All Other Fees

  

$

0

 

  

$

2,000

 

Total

  

$

622,598

 

  

$

765,378

 

*As discussed below, Deloitte was appointed to servehas served as our independent registered public accounting firm beginning on March 18, 2019,since 2019.

Audit Fees and the fees discussed include only those paid to Deloitte. Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) was our previous independent registered public accounting firm.Services

 

  2020   2019 

Audit Fees

  

$

526,205

 

  

$

496,898

 

Audit Related Fees

  

$

0

 

  

$

0

 

Tax Fees

  

$

218,764

 

  

$

125,700

 

All Other Fees

  

$

0

 

  

$

0

 

Total

  

$

744,969

 

  

$

622,598

 

Audit Fees. This category includes the aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20192020 and for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020.

Audit-Related Fees. This category includes the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements, including fees for the performance of audits and attest services not required by statute or regulations; audits of the Company’s employee benefit plans; due diligence activities related to investments; and accounting consultations about the application of generally accepted accounting principles to proposed transactions .transactions.

Tax Fees. This category includes the aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, advice, and planning services.

All Other Fees. This category includes the aggregate fees billed for any permitted services not included in categories above, which includes annual subscription fees for accounting practice publications.

Audit CommitteePre-Approval

The Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committeepre-approve all services performed by the Company’s outside auditor. To fulfill this requirement, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm provides a proposal to the Audit Committee for all services it proposes to provide, and the Audit Committee then reviews and approves, rejects, or seeks to modify the proposal. During the years ending December 31, 20192020 and December 31, 2018,2019, 100% of the services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accouting firmsaccounting firm werepre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Prior Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on March 21, 2019, Ernst &Young, or E&Y, served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm until March 18, 2019, when the Audit Committee dismissed E&Y. The decision to change our independent registered public accounting firm was recommended and approved by the Audit Committee.

The reports of E&Y on the Company’s financial statements for each ofthe fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the subsequent interim period through March 18, 2019, there were no disagreements (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of RegulationS-K and related instructions) between the Company and E&Y on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of E&Y, would have caused E&Y to make reference thereto in its reports on the financial statements for such years.

Representatives of E&Y are not expected to be present at the 20202021 Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020.2021.

PROPOSAL 3

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the “Exchange Act”), we are asking shareholders to approve on an advisory basis the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement on pages 2824 to 64.55. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s NEOs and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement, for the following reasons.

Sound Program Design

We design our executive officers’ compensation programs to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success and industry leadership while considering individual and Company performance and alignment with the interest of long-term shareholders. We achieve our objectives through compensation that:

 

✓  provides a competitive total pay opportunity,

✓  consists primarily of performance-based compensation,

✓  enhances retention through multi-year vesting of stock awards, and

✓  does not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking.

LOGO

Best Practices in Executive Compensation

Some of our leading practices include

 

✓  an executive compensation recovery policy,

✓  an executive stock ownership policy,

✓  a policy prohibiting pledging and hedging of Tejon stock,

✓  no executive-only perquisites or benefits,

✓  no guaranteed bonus programs, and

✓  utilization of an independent compensation consultant who reports to the Compensation Committee.

The advisory proposal, commonly referred to as a“say-on-pay” proposal, is not binding on the Board. Although the voting results are not binding, the Board will review and consider them when evaluating our executive compensation program.

The Board has adopted a policy of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year, and unless the Board modifies its policy, we expect that, after the 20202021 Annual Meeting, the next advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs will take place at our 20212022 Annual Meeting.

Brokers do not have discretion to vote on this proposal without your instruction. Therefore, if you are a beneficial owner and you do not instruct your broker how to vote on this proposal, your shares will not be voted on this proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NEOS AS DISCLOSED ON PAGES 2824 TO 6455 IN THE PROXY STATEMENT.

PROPOSAL 4

AMENDMENTSAMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK

After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board unanimously voted to approve, and to recommend to our shareholders that they approve and adopt, certain amendmentsan amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”).

Description of the Amendment

The amendments are being presented to shareholders for their approval as three separate proposals:

Proposal 4(a)proposed amendment would amend Article V to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 30,000,000 to 50,000,000. If the amendment is approved, the first paragraph of Article V of the Certificate will be amended and restated as follows to declassifyreplace the current authorization of “Thirty Million (30,000,000)” to “Fifty Million (50,000,000)”:

The Corporation shall be authorized to issue two classes of shares of stock to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock”; the total number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue shall be Fifty Million (50,000,000), and each such share shall have a par value of $.50; and the total number of shares of Preferred Stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue shall be Five Million (5,000,000) and each such share shall have a par value of $1.00.

The second paragraph of Article V and the other remaining provisions of the Certificate would remain unchanged.

Reasons for Increasing the Number of Authorized Shares

The Company currently has 30,000,000 shares of common stock authorized. As of March 24, 2021, there were [                ] shares of common stock outstanding or reserved (excluding treasury shares). The common stock may be issued from time to time as determined by the Board. The additional 20,000,000 shares would be part of the existing class of common stock and, if and when issued, would have rights identical to the currently outstanding common stock of the Company.

The Board believes that the proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock will benefit us by improving our flexibility in responding to future business needs and opportunities. The additional shares of common stock may be used for such corporate purposes as may be determined by the Board overfrom time to time to be necessary or desirable. These purposes may include: (i) raising capital through the sale of common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for common stock, (ii) effecting a three-year periodstock split or issuing a stock dividend, (iii) acquiring other businesses or assets in exchange for common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for common stock, (iv) attracting and provide for the annual election of all directors;

Proposal 4(b) would remove the Certificate provisions related to the submission of nominations and other business at shareholder meetings, which would be governed exclusivelyretaining employees by the Bylaws;

Proposal 4(c) would make variousnon-substantive changesissuance of additional securities pursuant to the Certificate.

The proposed amendments in Proposals 4(a) through 4(c) (collectively, the “Proposed Certificate Amendments”) are described below.

Upon the recommendation of the Nominatingemployee plans agreements, and Corporate Governance Committee,(vi) other proper corporate purposes. If approved, the Board has adopted resolutions setting forthwill have the Proposed Certificate Amendments, declaringauthority to issue approximately 20 million additional shares of common stock without incurring the Proposed Certificate Amendments advisabledelay and expense of further shareholder approval, except as may be required for a particular transaction by applicable law or regulation or by the NYSE Listed Company Manual or any other securities exchange on which the Company’s securities may then be listed.

The increase in the best interestsnumber of authorized shares is not intended to impede a change of control, and we are not aware of any efforts to acquire control of the Company and its shareholders, directingor otherwise accumulate shares of our common stock. It is possible, however, that the Proposed Certificate Amendmentsadditional shares contemplated by the amendment could be submitted to the Company’s shareholders for approval and adoption, and recommending that the shareholders approve and adopt the Proposed Certificate Amendments.

Proposal 4(c) is conditioned on the approval of both Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b). Therefore, unless shareholders approve both Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b),issued in connection with defending the Company will not fileagainst a certificatehostile takeover bid to dilute the equity ownership of amendment setting forth the Proposed Certificate Amendments set forth in Proposal 4(c), even if it receives enough affirmative votesa person or entity seeking to pass independently. Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b) are not conditioned on the approval of each other or the approval of Proposal 4(c). Accordingly, each of Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b) will pass if it independently receives enough affirmative votes.

Proposal 4(a): Amendment to Declassify the Board and Provide for the Annual Election of All Directors

Proposal 4(a) would amend the Certificate to phase out the classificationobtain control of the Board overCompany, or in a three-year period and provide instead forprivate placement with purchasers who might side with the annual election of directors (the “Declassification Amendment”).

Reasons for Declassifying the Board

The Certificate currently divides our Board into three classes, with each class elected to serve a three-year term. As a result, at each annual meeting of shareholders, approximatelyone-third of our directors are elected to serve for a three-year term.

Our Board periodically reviews our governance structure and practices, including the continued appropriateness of our classified board structure. As part of its most recent review, and in considering the Declassification Amendment, the Board considered various factors that favor moving to the annual election of all directors, as well as factors that favor continuing with a classified board structure. Among other things, the Board considered that many investors and commentators support annual elections and believe they enhance accountability and responsiveness to shareholders. The Board also recognizes that moving to annual elections is consistent with practices adopted by many companies in recent years.

The Board also took into account the potential benefits of classified boards. These benefits include: (1) promoting stability and continuity of leadership, which are important to the Company because of the long-

term nature and multi-generational time horizons for the developmentBoard if it chose to oppose a specific change of many of the Company’s core business assets; (2) enhancingnon-management directors’ independence from special interest groups or other parties whose goals may notcontrol. These additional shares also could be issued in the best interests of all of our shareholders; and (3) helping the Board achieve value for our shareholders in the event oforder to deter an unsolicited takeover. By increasing the time necessary to elect directors who constitute a majority of the board, a classified board provides a board of directors with the time and flexibility necessary to evaluate the adequacy and fairness of any takeover proposal, negotiate on behalf of all shareholders and weigh alternative methods of maximizing value for all shareholders, without the threat of imminent removal of a majority of board members.

In addition, because the Board is classified, currently directors can be removed only for cause, whereas under Delaware law directors elected to a board that is not classified can be removed with or without cause. If the Declassification Amendment is approved and implemented, it would be easier for one or more shareholders holding a large number of shares, whether an existing or long-term shareholder or one that accumulates a large position in or for a short period of time,attempt to replace the entire Board at once.

Descriptionby diluting the percentage of shares held by persons seeking to control us by obtaining seats on the Board. Accordingly, the amendment could have the effect of discouraging efforts to gain control of the Declassification Amendment

Article VIII, Section 1Company in a matter not approved by the Board. The actual issuance of additional shares of our common stock in the future could have a dilutive effect on earnings per share and on the equity and voting rights of the Certificatepresent holders of our common stock. We currently provides thathave no formal plans, understandings, contracts, agreements or arrangements with respect to the Board is divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible, composedissuance of directors each serving termsadditional shares of three years. Proposal 4(a) would amend Article VIII, Section 1 to removecommon stock not previously authorized for issuance by the classified board structure over a three-year periodBoard. Shareholders do not have, and provide for the annual election of directors commencing with the 2023 annual meeting. It would also amend Article VIII, Section 3, which addresses removal of directors, to provide that directors can be removed with or without cause once the Board is declassified.

If the Declassification Amendment is approved and adopted by shareholders, the declassification of the Board would be phased in over a period of three years. The Declassification Amendmentproposed amendment would not shorten the existing terms of directors. Accordingly, a director who has been elected to a three-year term (including directors elected at the 2020 Annual Meeting) will serve for that term. At the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders, the Class I directors, whose terms expire at that meeting, would be elected for atwo-year term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders. At the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, the Class II directors, whose terms expire at that meeting, would be elected for aone-year term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders. Beginning with the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, the declassification of the Board would be complete and all directors would be subject to annual election forone-year terms. Consistent with Delaware law, the Declassification Amendment also provides that beginning with the 2023 annual meeting, directors may be removed either with or without cause. Until that time, directors would continue to be removable only for cause.

The general description of the Declassification Amendment set forth above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Declassification Amendment, which is included onAnnex 1 to these proxy materials and which is incorporated by reference herein. Additions are indicated by double underlining and deletions are indicated by strike-outs.create, any preemptive rights.

Additional Information

If shareholders approve the Declassification Amendment,proposed amendment, it will become effective upon filing and effectiveness of a certificate of amendment to the Certificate setting forth the Declassification Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State, which we anticipate doing as soon as practicable following shareholder approval. The Board also intends to approve conforming amendments to the Bylaws that would take effect once the Declassification Amendment is effective. If shareholders do not approve the Declassification Amendment, the Board will remain classified, the certificate of amendment will not be filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, and the Board will not adopt conforming amendments to the Bylaws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 4(A).

Proposal 4(b): Amendment to Remove Certificate Provisions Related to the Submission of Nominations and Other Business at Shareholder Meetings, Which Would Be Governed Exclusively by the Bylaws

Proposal 4(b) would amend the Certificate to remove the advance notice deadlines and related requirements governing the submission of nominations and other business to be presented at shareholder meetings (the “Advance Notice Amendment”) and provide that such nominations and other business must be made in the manner set forth in the Bylaws. If Proposal 4(b) is approved by shareholders, the Board intends to approve amendments to the advance notice provisions that are included the Bylaws to incorporate customary deadlines and make other updates described below.

Reasons for the Advance Notice Amendment

The Certificate currently contains basic advance notice procedures that shareholders must follow if they wish to propose nominations or other business at an annual meeting of shareholders. This includes deadlines for submitting nominations and other business, and limited informational requirements related to the proposing shareholder, any nominee being proposed and any other business being proposed. The Bylaws currently include additional information that shareholders must furnish to the Company in order to propose nominations or other business at a meeting of shareholders.

As part of the Board’s most recent review of our governance structure and practices, the Board evaluated whether to consolidate the Company’s advance notice provisions in the Bylaws and remove the existing provisions from the Certificate. The Board considered that having advance notice provisions exclusively in the Bylaws would provide significantly greater flexibility and enable the Company to respond more rapidly to developments in law and practice. In this regard, the Board has the authority to amend the Bylaws on its own, while amendments to the Certificate (including the Advance Notice Amendment) require shareholder approval. The Company also believes that including advance notice provisions in the bylaws, rather than the certificate of incorporation, is more typical for public companies. Finally, the Board took into account that under the current deadlines in the Certificate, the Company’s advance notice deadline is only 30 days before the annual meeting date, which results in a limited window of time for shareholders and the Company to consider matters submitted through the advance notice process. Enhancing the Company’s ability to maintain modern, appropriately crafted advance notice bylaws benefits shareholders by providing them with adequate advance notice of matters proposed through the advance notice process and full disclosure about shareholders seeking to use that process.

Description of the Advance Notice Amendment

The advance notice provisions in the Certificate are set forth in Article VIII, Section 4 and Article XIV, which include a requirement that shareholders submit notice of nominations and other business not less than 30 or more than 60 days prior to the current year’s annual meeting. Article VIII, Section 4 and Article XIV also include basic informational requirements related to the proposing shareholder and the nominee or the matter being proposed. Article II, Section 10 of the Bylaws requires that shareholders comply with the deadlines in the Certificate and provide the Company with information required in the Certificate and additional information outlined in Article II, Section 10 of the Bylaws.

If the Advance Notice Amendment is approved by shareholders, Article VIII, Section 4 would be integrated into Article XIV, which would be amended to state that nominations and the proposal of business other than nominations may be made at meetings of shareholders only in the manner set forth in the Bylaws. Following shareholder approval of the Advance Notice Amendment, the Board intends to approve amendments to the Bylaws to establish customary advance notice deadlines and make other updates, as necessary and appropriate, to align the advance notice provisions with practices in place at other companies. In particular, the Board intends to extend the advance notice deadlines so that notice must be delivered to the Company not less than 90 or more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. These deadlines will better align with practices at other public companies and the Company’s annual meeting schedule, and

provide shareholders with greater certainty about the deadlines because they will be tied to the anniversary date of the last annual meeting (rather than the upcoming annual meeting date, under the current deadlines in the Certificate). The deadlines will also give shareholders additional time to submit nominations and other proposals and afford both shareholders and the Company additional time to consider matters proposed through the advance notice process. The Board also plans to update the informational requirements in the advance notice bylaws so that the Company and other shareholders have comprehensive, relevant information about the proposing shareholder, including information about the full extent of the shareholder’s economic and voting interests in the Company, and about nominees and other matters being proposed under the advance notice bylaws.

The general description of the Advance Notice Amendment set forth above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Advance Notice Amendment, which is included onAnnex 1 to these proxy materials and which is incorporated by reference herein. Additions are indicated by double underlining and deletions are indicated by strike-outs.

Additional Information

If shareholders approve the Advance Notice Amendment, it will become effective upon filing and effectiveness of a certificate of amendment to the Certificate setting forth the Advance Notice Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State, which we anticipate doing as soon as practicable following shareholder approval. The Board also intends to approve the Bylaw amendments described above, which would take effect once the Advance Notice Amendment is effective. If shareholders do not approve the Advance Notice Amendment, the advance notice provisions in the Certificate would remain unchanged, and the certificate of amendment to the Certificate will not be filed with the Delaware Secretary of State.

If the Advance Notice Amendment does not take effect, going forward, the Board could amend the advance notice provisions in the Bylaws, in a manner consistent with the provisions in the Certificate, because the Board has the authority to amend the Bylaws.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 4(B).

Proposal 4(c): Amendments to MakeNon-Substantive Changes to the Certificate

Proposal 4(c) would amend the Certificate to make variousnon-substantive updates and changes to the Certificate (the “Additional Amendments”).

Reasons for and Description of the Additional Amendments

The Additional Amendments would update and amend various provisions of the Certificate and remove provisions that no longer apply, as follows:

Article VI of the Certificate would be amended to remove the requirement that the Board amend the Bylaws in order to change its size. This would afford flexibility by allowing the Board to set its size by adopting a resolution.

Article II, Section H would be amended to remove references to entities that are no longer shareholders from the definition of “Related Person.”

Various provisions of the Certificate would be amended to replace references to “shareholder” with “stockholder,” which is the term used in the Delaware General Corporation Law, and to delete outdated language that is no longer operative.

Otherclean-up changes including changes to conform with the requirements of applicable law.

Approval of the Additional Amendments will not substantively affect the rights of shareholders.

If the Additional Amendments take effect, the Board intends to approve a conforming change to Article III, Section 2 of the Bylaws to address the process for setting the size of the Board by resolution.

Additional Information

Proposal 4(c) is conditioned on the approval of both Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b). Therefore, unless shareholders approve both Proposal 4(a) and Proposal 4(b), the Company will not file a certificate of amendment setting forth the proposed amendments in Proposal 4(c), even if it receives enough affirmative votes to pass independently.

If shareholders approve Proposals 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c), the Additional Amendments will become effective upon filing and effectiveness of a certificate of amendment to the Certificate setting forth the Additional Amendments with the Delaware Secretary of State, which we anticipate doing as soon as practicable following shareholder approval. If the Additional Amendments take effect, the Board intends toshareholders do not approve the conforming change toamendment, the Bylaws described above, relating to the process for setting the sizenumber of the Board.

If the Additional Amendments do not take effect, the Certificate provisions that would be affected by the Additional Amendments wouldauthorized shares will remain unchanged,at 30 million, and the certificate of amendment to the Certificate will not be filed with the Delaware Secretary of State,State. The Board reserves the right, notwithstanding shareholder approval of the proposed amendment to the Certificate, and without further action by the shareholders, to elect not to proceed with the amendment if, at any time prior to filing the amendment, the Board will not adoptdetermines that it is no longer in the conforming changebest interests of the Company and shareholders to proceed with the Bylaws.amendment.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 4(C).THE AMENDMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Consideration of Director Nominees

The Board believes the Board, as a whole, should possess the requisite combination of skills, professional experience, and diversity of backgrounds to oversee the Company’s business. The Board also believes that each individual director should possess certain attributes, as discussed below. Accordingly, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) consider the qualifications of directors and director candidates individually, as well as in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition and the Company’s current and future needs.

The Nominating Committee is responsible for selecting nominees for election to the Board. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating Committee evaluates the entirety of each candidate’s credentials, attributes, and other factors (as described in greater detail in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines) but does not have any specific minimum qualifications that a nominee must meet. However, the Nominating Committee seeks as directors individuals with substantial management experience who possess the highest personal values, judgment, and integrity; an understanding of the environment in which the Company does business; and diverse experience with the key business, financial, and other challenges that the Company faces. In addition, in considering the nomination of existing directors, the Nominating Committee takes into consideration (i) each director’s contribution to the Board; (ii) any material change in the director’s employment or responsibilities with any other organization; (iii) the director’s ability to attend meetings and fully participate in Board and committee activities on which the director serves; (iv) whether the director has developed any relationships with the Company or another organization, or other circumstances that may have arisen, that might make it inappropriate for the director to continue serving on the Board; and (v) the director’s age and length of service on the Board.

Because the Nominating Committee recognizes that a diversity of backgrounds and cultures, including on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, underrepresented communities, viewpoints, and practical experiences can enhance the effectiveness of the Board, asBoard. As part of its evaluation of each candidate, the Nominating Committee takes into account how each candidate’s diversity, background, experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills may complement, supplement, or duplicate those of other prospective candidates. The Nominating Committee reviews its effectiveness in balancing these considerations when assessing the composition of the Board, which as discussed below is one of the committee’s responsibilities. In addition, the Board is committed to having a membership that reflects a diversity of ethnicity, race and gender.

Based on the parameters described above, the Board has determined that the directors standing for reelection and the remaining members of the Board have the qualifications, experience, and attributes appropriate for a director of the Company. As reflected below, each director has a varied background in the real estate industry, finance, public policy and/or agriculture. These are all areas that are integral to the strategy, operations, and successful oversight of the Company.

Board Composition and Leadership Structure

The Board is grouped into three classes: (1) Class I Directors, whose terms will expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting; (2) Class II Directors, whose terms will expire at the 2022 Annual Meeting; and (3) Class III Directors, whose terms will expire at the 20202023 Annual Meeting. The Board currently consists of eightnine directors, as the Board reducedincreased its size from eight to nine to eight directors following the 2019 Annual Meeting.on January 1, 2021.    The Board’s leadership is structured so that the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) are separate positions. The Chairman of the Board is also an independent director. The Board believes that this structure is appropriate for our Company and our shareholders at this time because it provides an additional layer of oversight as to management and management’s activities and allows the Board to act independently of management.

Director Qualifications and Biographical Information

The Nominating Committee considered the character, experience, qualifications, and skills of each director, including the current director nominees, when determining whether each should serve as a director of the

Company. In keeping with its stated criteria for director nominees described in the section entitled “Consideration of Director Nominees” above, the Nominating Committee determined that each director, including the current director nominees, has substantial management experience, exhibits the highest personal values, judgment, and integrity, and possesses both an understanding of the environment in which the Company does business and diverse experience with the key business, financial, and other challenges that the Company faces. Each director is or has been a leader in his or her respective field and brings diverse talents and perspectives to the Board. The Nominating Committee also considered the experience and qualifications outlined below in the biographical information for each director, including the current director nominees, as well as other public company board service.

The Nominating Committee noted the following particular attributes and qualities it considers when evaluating director nominees. The Nominating Committee believes that nominees with business, governmental, and strategic management experience gained from service as a chief executive officer or similar position is a critical leadership component to Board service. The Nominating Committee also seeks nominees with backgrounds in finance, banking, economics, public administration and the securities and financial markets, in order to have directors who can assess and evaluate the Company’s financial and competitive position. The Nominating Committee emphasizes familiarity with the real estate and agricultural industries and considers customer perspectives to be important when evaluating director nominees. Although the directors listed below each possess a number of these attributes, the Nominating Committee considered the specific areas noted below for each director when determining which of the director’s qualifications best suit the needs of the Company and qualify them to serve as a director of the Company.

The following table sets forth information regarding the nominees for Class III Directors at the 20202021 Annual Meeting, as well as the Class III and Class III Directors.

 

 Class III Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2020 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships                                                                                       

  

 

Director
Since

   

Age

 

 

 Gregory S. Bielli

   2013    59 

 

Mr. Bielli is President and CEO of Tejon Ranch Co., a position he’s held since December 2013. Prior to this position, Mr. Bielli served as the Chief Operating Officer for the Company from September 2013 through November 2013. Mr. Bielli has over 30 years of experience in real estate, land acquisition, development, and financing. Prior to Tejon Ranch, he was a regional president of Newland Communities, one of the country’s largest and most successful master planned community developers. Mr. Bielli served as President of Newland’s Western Region from 2006 until September 2013. Mr. Bielli earned a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of Arizona in 1983. Our Board believes Mr. Bielli’s experience in real estate operations, specifically master planned communities, and his position as CEO of the Company, makes him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Anthony L. Leggio

   2012    67 

 

Mr. Leggio has been President of Bolthouse Properties, LLC, a diversified real estate development company with commercial, residential and agricultural holdings, since January 2006. Prior to serving at Bolthouse Properties, LLC, Mr. Leggio served as Vice President and General Counsel of Wm. Bolthouse Farms from July 2001 until December 2005. Previously, Mr. Leggio was Managing Partner of the law firm of Clifford and Brown for nearly 25 years. Mr. Leggio has served as a director of Valley Republic Bank since 2008. Mr. Leggio has also served as a director of private companies Three Way Chevrolet Company since 2000, H.F. Cox Trucking since 1993, Mark Christopher Chevrolet since 2001, and W.B. Camp Companies since 2009. Mr. Leggio received his B.S. degree from the University of the Pacific and his J.D. from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. Our Board believes Mr. Leggio’s real estate development and agricultural experience, his tenure as chief executive officer of a real estate development company and his legal experience make him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Norman J. Metcalfe

   1998    77 

 

Mr. Metcalfe has served as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2014. Mr. Metcalfe has an extensive history and background in real estate development and homebuilding. He previously was Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of The Irvine Company, one of the nation’s largest real estate and community development companies. Mr. Metcalfe retired from The Irvine Company in 1997. Prior to The Irvine Company, Mr. Metcalfe spent over 20 years in various real estate, corporate finance and investment positions with the Kaufman and Broad/SunAmerica family of companies. These positions included President and Chief Investment Officer of SunAmerica Investments and Chief Financial Officer of Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation (currently known as KB Home). Mr. Metcalfe served as a director of CalAtlantic Homes from 2000 until February 2018. Mr. Metcalfe received a B.S. and an M.B.A. from the University of Washington. Our Board believes Mr. Metcalfe’s extensive financial experience, understanding of capital structure within the real estate industry, and experience in publicly held companies make him very qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Class I Director Whose Term Expires in 2021 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships

  

 

Director
Since

   

Age

 

 

 Jean Fuller

 

   2019    71 

Jean Fuller holds a Ph.D. from the University of California, Santa Barbara, a Master of Public Administration from the California State University, Los Angeles, and a Bachelor of Arts, Summa Cum Laude (All honors) degree in communications from California State University, Fresno. Prior to being elected to our Board she served in the California Senate from 2010 to 2018, after which she retired. Jean Fuller served as Vice Chair of the Senate Rules; Budget, Energy, Utilities & Communications; Natural Resources and Water; and Environmental Quality Committees. Prior to the California Senate, she served two terms in the California State Assembly from 2006-2009 in which she was presiding officer. From 1999 to 2006, Jean Fuller served as Superintendent (the Chief Executive Officer) of the Bakersfield City School District, which at the time serviced more than 30,000 students, had a budget in excess of $100 million and had 3,500 employees. Our Board believes that Jean Fuller’s experience as the chief executive officer of a large public agency and her expertise with legislative and regulatory issues, particularly with respect to natural resources, water, and environmental quality, make her very qualified to serve as a director on our Board.

    

 Geoffrey L. Stack

 

   1998    77 

Mr. Stack is one of the Founding Partners of the Sares-Regis Group, a commercial and residential real estate development and management firm since its inception in 1993. He currently sits on the Investment committee for the company. Mr. Stack was responsible for all residential operations of Sares-Regis, including development, acquisitions, finance, and management activities until 2018. Mr. Stack graduated from Georgetown University and received an M.B.A. in Real Estate Finance at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Stack is a past trustee of the Urban Land Institute (“ULI”) and the former Chairman of the ULI Foundation. He is also the past Chairman of the National Multifamily Housing Council. Our Board believes Mr. Stack’s real estate development experience and his experience as the managing director of a real estate company make him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Michael H. Winer

 

   2001    65 

Mr. Winer was employed as a senior investment manager by Third Avenue Management LLC (or its predecessor) from 1994 through 2018, when he retired. Mr. Winer managed The Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund, an open-end mutual fund that invests in the securities of publicly traded real estate and real estate-related companies in developed countries, by adhering to a strict value-investing approach. Mr. Winer has no continuing affiliation with Third Avenue Management LLC or the Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund. From 2009 through 2016, Mr. Winer served as a director of Newhall Holding Company LLC. In 2016, Newhall merged with two other California master-planned communities. Since the merger in May 2016, Mr. Winer has served as a director of the merged entity, Five Point Holdings LLC, where he is the Chair of the Compensation Committee and serves on the Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He also has served as a director of private company 26900 Newport Inc. since 1998. Since 2016, Mr. Winer has been a member of the Board of Trustees of two not-for-profit organizations: The Pacific Legal Foundation (from which he resigned in September of 2018) and the Future Citizens Foundation (dba The First Tee of Monterey County). Mr. Winer received a B.S. degree in accounting from San Diego State University and is a certified public accountant in California (inactive). Our Board believes that Mr. Winer’s investment industry background and specifically, his experience with real estate investing, make him very qualified to serve as a director on our Board.

    

 Class II Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships                                                                                       

  

 

Director
Since

   

Age

 

 

 Steven A. Betts

   2014    62 

 

Mr. Betts is President of Betts Real Estate Advisors, a consulting company he founded in 2017. He has served as a strategic advisor to the Holualoa Companies, a commercial real estate investment company with three-quarters of a billion dollars in assets held all across the U.S. and in Europe, since 2015; as a strategic advisor to the Southwest Division of Hines, one of the largest commercial investment and development companies in the world, since 2015; as a strategic advisor to the Helios Education Foundation, the largest education foundation in Arizona and Florida, since 2016: and as a strategic advisor to the Fortuitous Opportunity Fund specializing in sports anchored mixed use commercial projects. He is the Chairman of University Realty, a subsidiary of Enterprise Partners, an affiliate of Arizona State University. He was also the Director of Development for Chanen Development Company, an affiliate of Chanen Construction, headquartered in Phoenix, from November 2013 to the end of 2018. Briefly, from June to October 2013, he served as the interim CEO of the PhoenixMart project. Mr. Betts also served as the Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Assets for the ASU Foundation from March 2012 through May 2013. Prior to these endeavors, Mr. Betts was President and CEO of SunCor Development Company (“SunCor”) from 2005 to 2010, a half-billion-dollar-plus asset-based subsidiary of the publicly traded Pinnacle West Capital Corporation. SunCor was a developer of master planned communities throughout the Mountainwest and large-scale commercial projects in Metropolitan Phoenix. Mr. Betts holds numerous private board and committee posts, including the executive committee of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, the Governor’s Transportation and Trade Alliance, Board member and Past Chairman of the Interstate 11 Coalition, Trustee and Past Chairman of the Arizona Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, member and a past-chair of the Urban LandInstitute-Arizona District Council Governance Committee. Mr. Betts received his law degree with honors from DePaul University and a B.A. with honors from Augustana College. Our Board believes that Mr. Betts’ master planned community background makes him very qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Daniel R. Tisch

   2012    69 

 

Mr. Tisch has been the managing member of TowerView LLC, an investment fund of the Tisch Family, since 2001. Since January 2012, Mr. Tisch has also served as a director of Vornado Realty Trust, a real estate investment trust. Mr. Tisch graduated from Brown University and has over 40 years of investing experience. Mr. Tisch worked for major Wall Street firms from 1973 to 1989 and has been managing investment partnerships since then. Our Board believes that Mr. Tisch’s investment industry background and his experience in capital raising and risk management make him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Class II Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships

  

 

Director
Since

   

Age

 

 

 Steven A. Betts

 

   2014    63 

Mr. Betts is Managing Director of Development for Holualoa Companies, a 35-year old real estate investment and development company with three-quarters of a billion dollars in assets held all across the U.S. and in Europe. He has held this position since August 2020. Prior to this he served as a strategic advisor to Holualoa since 2015. Mr. Betts is also President of Betts Real Estate Advisors, a consulting company he founded in 2017. He has served as a strategic advisor to the Southwest Division of Hines, one of the largest commercial investment and development companies in the world, since 2015; as a strategic advisor to the Helios Education Foundation, the largest education foundation in Arizona and Florida, since 2016: and as a strategic advisor to the Fortuitous Opportunity Fund specializing in sports anchored mixed use commercial projects. He is the Chairman of University Realty, a subsidiary of Enterprise Partners, an affiliate of Arizona State University. He was also the Director of Development for Chanen Development Company, an affiliate of Chanen Construction, headquartered in Phoenix, from November 2013 to the end of 2018. Briefly, from June to October 2013, he served as the interim CEO of the PhoenixMart project. Mr. Betts also served as the Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Assets for the ASU Foundation from March 2012 through May 2013. Prior to these endeavors, Mr. Betts was President and CEO of SunCor Development Company (“SunCor”) from 2005 to 2010, a half-billion-dollar-plus asset-based subsidiary of the publicly traded Pinnacle West Capital Corporation. SunCor was a developer of master planned communities throughout the Mountainwest and large-scale commercial projects in Metropolitan Phoenix. Mr. Betts holds numerous private board and committee posts, including the executive committee of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, the Governor’s Transportation and Trade Alliance, Board member and Past Chairman of the Interstate 11 Coalition, Trustee and Past Chairman of the Arizona Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, member and a past-chair of the Urban Land Institute-Arizona District Council Governance Committee. Mr. Betts received his law degree with honors from DePaul University and a B.A. with honors from Augustana College. Our Board believes that Mr. Betts’ master planned community background makes him very qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Rhea Frawn Morgan

 

   2021    64 

Ms. Morgan has been the Managing Member and Chief Executive of LDC Advisors, LLC., since 2015. LDC Advisors is a real asset advisory firm specializing in advisory and management of large scale real estate development projects for private and institutional owners. She is a real estate development and advisory professional who has been responsible throughout her career for more than $10 billion of assets owned by institutional investors including private equity and public pension funds. From 2008-2014, operating as an independent fiduciary, Ms. Morgan managed a multi-billion-dollar investment portfolio invested in real estate assets including master planned communities under development, active adult/resort projects, land in various stages of entitlement and planning, and raw land held for future development. Ms. Morgan has multiple master’s degrees from the University of Pennsylvania and Northeastern University in Boston, MA, and is in the process of obtaining a Doctor of Education degree in Organizational Leadership from Northeastern. She is a member of the Urban Land Institute’s Women’s Leadership Initiative District Council, the Women’s Housing Leadership Group, and the National Association of Women in Real Estate Businesses.

    

 Class I Director Whose Term Expires in 2021 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships                                                                                 

  Director
Since
  Age

 

 Jean Fuller

 

  2019  62

Jean Fuller holds a Ph.D. from the University of California, Santa Barbara, a Master of Public Administration from the California State University, Los Angeles, and a Bachelor of Arts, Summa Cum Laude (All honors) degree in communications from California State University, Fresno. Prior to being elected to our Board she served in the California Senate from 2010 to 2018, after which she retired. Jean Fuller served as Vice Chair of the Senate Rules; Budget, Energy, Utilities & Communications; Natural Resources and Water; and Environmental Quality Committees. Prior to the California Senate, she served two terms in the California State Assembly from 2006-2009 in which she was presiding officer. From 1999 to 2006, Jean Fuller served as Superintendent (the Chief Executive Officer) of the Bakersfield City School District, which at the time serviced more than 30,000 students, had a budget in excess of $100 million and had 3,500 employees. Our Board believes that Jean Fuller’s experience as the chief executive officer of a large public agency and her expertise with legislative and regulatory issues, particularly with respect to natural resources, water, and environmental quality, make her very qualified to serve as a director on our Board.

    

 Geoffrey L. Stack

  1998  76

 

Mr. Stack is one of the Founding Partners of the Sares-Regis Group, a commercial and residential real estate development and management firm since its inception in 1993. He currently sits on the Investment committee for the company. Mr. Stack was responsible for all residential operations of Sares-Regis, including development, acquisitions, finance, and management activities until 2018. Mr. Stack graduated from Georgetown University and received an M.B.A. in Real Estate Finance at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Stack is a past trustee of the Urban Land Institute (“ULI”) and the former Chairman of the ULI Foundation. He is also the past Chairman of the National Multifamily Housing Council. Our Board believes Mr. Stack’s real estate development experience and his experience as the managing director of a real estate company make him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Michael H. Winer

  2001  64

 

Mr. Winer was employed as a senior investment manager by Third Avenue Management LLC (or its predecessor) from 1994 through 2018, when he retired, Mr. Winer managed The Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund anopen-end mutual fund that invests in the securities of publicly traded real estate and real estate-related companies in developed countries by adhering to a strict value-investing approach. Mr. Winer has no continuing affiliation with Third Avenue Management LLC or the Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund. From 2009 through 2016, Mr. Winer served as a director of Newhall Holding Company LLC. In 2016, Newhall merged with two other California master-planned communities. Since the merger in May 2016, Mr. Winer has served as a director of the merged entity, Five Point Holdings LLC, where he is the Chair of the Compensation Committee and serves on the Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He also has served as a director of private company 26900 Newport Inc. since 1998. Since 2016, Mr. Winer has been a member of the Board of Trustees of twonot-for-profit organizations: The Pacific Legal Foundation (from which he resigned in September of 2018) and the Future Citizens Foundation (dba The First Tee of Monterey County). Mr. Winer received a B.S. degree in accounting from San Diego State University and is a certified public accountant in California (inactive). Our Board believes that Mr. Winer’s investment industry background and specifically, his experience with real estate investing, make him very qualified to serve as a director on our Board.

    

 Class II Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships

  

 

Director
Since

   

Age

 

 

 Daniel R. Tisch

 

   2012    70 

Mr. Tisch has been the managing member of TowerView LLC, an investment fund of the Tisch Family, since 2001. Since January 2012, Mr. Tisch has also served as a director of Vornado Realty Trust, a real estate investment trust. Mr. Tisch graduated from Brown University and has over 40 years of investing experience. Mr. Tisch worked for major Wall Street firms from 1973 to 1989 and has been managing investment partnerships since then. Our Board believes that Mr. Tisch’s investment industry background and his experience in capital raising and risk management make him well qualified to serve as a director.

 

 

    

 Class III Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2023 and Their Principal Occupation,

 Employment, or Directorships

  

 

Director
Shares

   

Age

 

 Gregory S. Bielli

 

   2013    60 

Mr. Bielli is President and CEO of Tejon Ranch Co., a position he’s held since December 2013. Prior to this position, Mr. Bielli served as the Chief Operating Officer for the Company from September 2013 through November 2013. Mr. Bielli has over 30 years of experience in real estate, land acquisition, development, and financing. Prior to Tejon Ranch, he was a regional president of Newland Communities, one of the country’s largest and most successful master planned community developers. Mr. Bielli served as President of Newland’s Western Region from 2006 until September 2013. Mr. Bielli earned a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of Arizona in 1983. Our Board believes Mr. Bielli’s experience in real estate operations, specifically master planned communities, and his position as CEO of the Company, makes him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Anthony L. Leggio

 

   2012    68 

Mr. Leggio has been President of Bolthouse Properties, LLC, a diversified real estate development company with commercial, residential and agricultural holdings since January 2006. Prior to serving at Bolthouse Properties, LLC, Mr. Leggio served as Vice President and General Counsel of Wm. Bolthouse Farms from July 2001 until December 2005. Previously, Mr. Leggio was Managing Partner of the law firm of Clifford and Brown for nearly 25 years. Mr. Leggio has served as a director of Valley Republic Bank since 2008. Mr. Leggio has also served as a director of private companies Three Way Chevrolet Company since 2000, H.F. Cox Trucking since 1993, Mark Christopher Chevrolet since 2001, and W.B. Camp Companies since 2009. Mr. Leggio received his B.S. degree from the University of the Pacific and his J.D. from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. Our Board believes Mr. Leggio’s real estate development and agricultural experience, his tenure as chief executive officer of a real estate development company and his legal experience make him well qualified to serve as a director.

    

 Norman J. Metcalfe

 

   1998    78 

Mr. Metcalfe has served as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since 2014. Mr. Metcalfe has an extensive history and background in real estate development and homebuilding. He previously was Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of The Irvine Company, one of the nation’s largest real estate and community development companies. Mr. Metcalfe retired from The Irvine Company in 1997. Prior to The Irvine Company, Mr. Metcalfe spent over 20 years in various real estate, corporate finance and investment positions with the Kaufman and Broad/SunAmerica family of companies. These positions included President and Chief Investment Officer of SunAmerica Investments and Chief Financial Officer of Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation (currently known as KB Home). Mr. Metcalfe served as a director of CalAtlantic Homes from 2000 until February 2018. Mr. Metcalfe received a B.S. and an M.B.A. from the University of Washington. Our Board believes Mr. Metcalfe’s extensive financial experience, understanding of capital structure within the real estate industry, and experience in publicly held companies make him very qualified to serve as a director.

    

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

The Board has determined that all directors, except Mr. Bielli, are “independent” under the listing standards of the NYSE and the Company’s categorical criteria used to determine whether a director is independent (the “Independence Standards”). The Independence Standards are set forth in Attachment A to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”), and a copy of the Independence Standards is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. Thus, the Board determined that the following directors are independent: Steven A. Betts, Jean Fuller, Anthony L. Leggio, Norman J. Metcalfe, Frawn Morgan, Geoffrey L. Stack, Daniel R. Tisch, and Michael H. Winer. In addition, the Board also determined that Robert A. Alter, who served as a director through the 2019 Annual Meeting, was independent during the time he served as a director. Also, in making its independence determinations, the Board reviewed additional information provided by the directors and the Company with regard to any business or personal activities or associations as they may relate to the Company and the Company’s management. The Board considered this information in the context of the NYSE’s objective listing standards, the Independence Standards, and for directors serving on committees, the additional standards established for members of audit committees and compensation committees. In reaching a determination on these directors’ independence, the Board considered that neither the directors nor their immediate family members have within the past three years had any direct or indirect business or professional relationships with the Company other than in their capacity as directors.

The Board’s independence determinations included a review of business dealings at companies where the directors serve as directors or outside consultants, all of which were ordinary course business transactions. The Board also performed a review of the Company’s charitable contributions to any organization where a director serves as an executive officer and found no contributions in excess of the Independence Standards or the NYSE’s objective listing standards.

The independent directors of the Board meet regularly in executive sessions outside the presence of management. As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Metcalfe presides over these executive sessions. During 2019,2020, there were four meetings of the Board, and all directors attended 75% or more100% of the aggregate total of such meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served.

The Company’s policy is that all directors are expected to attend every annual meeting of shareholder in person. All directors including Robert A. Alter, who retired at the conclusion of the 2019 Annual Meeting, attended the 20192020 Annual Meeting of the Company.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Standing committees of the Board include the Executive, Audit, Compensation, Investment Policy, Real Estate, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. The current members of the standing committees as of the date of this proxy statement are set forth belowbelow:

 

   Executive
Committee
  Audit
Committee
  Compensation
Committee
  Nominating
and

Corporate
Governance
Committee
  Real Estate
Committee
  Investment
Policy
Committee

Steven A. Betts

      

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

Gregory S. Bielli

  

LOGO

          

Jean Fuller

  

LOGO

      

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

Anthony L. Leggio

    

LOGO

  

LOGO

    

LOGO

  

Norman J. Metcalfe

  

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

LOGO

  

Geoffrey L. StackFrawn Morgan

    

LOGO

  

LOGO

Geoffrey L. Stack

    

LOGOLOGO

LOGO

LOGO

  

Daniel R. Tisch

  

LOGOLOGO

    

LOGOLOGO

  

LOGOLOGO

  

LOGO

  

Michael H. Winer

  

LOGOLOGO

  

LOGOLOGO

    

LOGOLOGO

  

LOGO

  

LOGOLOGO

 

LOGO Committee Chair          LOGO  Committee Member

During 2019,2020, there was one meeting of the Executive Committee, sevenfour meetings of the Audit Committee, eightthree meetings of the Compensation Committee, two meetings of the Real Estate Committee, nofour meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and no meetings of the Investment Policy Committee. The major functions of each of these committees, including their role in oversight of risks that could affect the Company, are described briefly below.

Each year, the Board performs a self-evaluation to assess its effectiveness and the participation of each board member. In addition, on an annual basis, the Audit Committee, Real Estate Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee all perform self-evaluations to measure their effectiveness.

The Executive Committee

Except for certain powers that, under Delaware law, may be exercised only by the full Board, or which, under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or the NYSE, may only be exercised by committees composed solely of independent directors, the Executive Committee may exercise all powers and authority of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Company.

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in discharging the Board’s oversight responsibility relating to (i) the accounting, reporting, and financial practices of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) the surveillance of administration and financial controls and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence; and (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s

independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the independent auditor and approves all audit andnon-audit services the independent auditor performs. It also reviews and discusses the Company’s policies with respect to risk

assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee reports regularly to the full Board with respect to its activities. The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The Audit Committee’s current charter is available on the Company’sweb-site, website, www.tejonranch.com, in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations webpage, and is available in print form upon request to the Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243.

In its annual self-evaluation, the Audit Committee reviews and assesses how effectively it fulfilled these purposes over the prior year and identifies areas for improvement. The Audit Committee also periodically reviews and updates itspre-approval and hiring policies related to the independent auditor. The Audit Committee engages proactively with Deloitte and management as needed in order to understand the status and strategy of the Company’s audit and to discuss new accounting standards or potentially significant events that may impact the Company’s financial reporting. In 2019,2020, these topics included an analysis of the new revenue recognition and lease accounting standards.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and under the Company’s Independence Standards, and that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and meets the requirements for audit committee membership set forth inRule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Board has further found that Mr. Leggio qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” for the purposes of Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K and has “accounting or related financial management expertise” as described in the listing standards of the NYSE.

The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s overall compensation structure, policies, and programs, and it assesses whether the Company’s compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees. It also reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of top managerial and executive officers, including the CEO, evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding their compensation. It administers and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s incentive compensation and equity-based compensation plans and grants of awards thereunder. It also reviews and recommends to the Board the design of other benefit plans, employment agreements, and severance arrangements for top managerial and executive officers. The Compensation Committee oversees the assessment of the risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and programs applicable to officers and employees, reviews the results of this assessment, and also assesses the results of the Company’s most recent advisory vote on executive compensation. It approves, amends, or modifies the terms of any compensation or benefit plan that does not require shareholder approval, if delegated to the Committee by the Board. It reviews and recommends changes for the compensation of directors, and it reviews succession plans relating to positions held by senior executive officers. It reports regularly to the Board with respect to its activities.

The Compensation Committee is governed by a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The Compensation Committee’s current charter is available on the Company’s website,www.tejonranch.com, in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations webpage, and is available in print form upon request to the Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243. The Compensation Committee is authorized to delegate to a subcommittee consisting of not less than two members of the Compensation Committee the responsibility to review specific issues, meet with management on behalf of the committee regarding such issues, and prepare recommendations for reports or review by the Committee. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE for directors and compensation committee members and under the Company’s Independence Standards.

The CEO does not participate in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations with regard to his own compensation. At the Compensation Committee’s request, the CEO reviews with the Compensation Committee the performance of the other executive officers, but no other executive officers have any input in executive

compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee gives substantial weight to the CEO’s evaluations and recommendations because he is particularly able to assess the other executive officers’ performance and contributions to the Company.

During 2019, theThe Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy to advise the Compensation Committee on marketplace trends in executive compensation and to analyze companies for peer company identification for the benchmarking of NEO compensation and NEO compensation decisions. The decision to engage an outside compensation consultant was not recommended by management. Semler Brossy consults with the Compensation Committee about its recommendations to the Board on CEO and other NEOs compensation. Semler Brossy did not provide any other services to the Company in 2019,2020, and its fees were $101,000$48,000 for the year. The Compensation Committee has reviewed an assessment of any potential conflicts of interest raised by Semler Brossy’s work for the Compensation Committee, which assessment considered the following six factors: (i) the provision of other services to the Company by Semler Brossy; (ii) the amount of fees received from the Company by Semler Brossy, as a percentage of Semler Brossy’s total revenue; (iii) the policies and procedures of Semler Brossy that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the Semler Brossy consultant with a member of the Compensation Committee; (v) any Company stock owned by the Semler Brossy consultants; and (vi) any business or personal relationship of the Semler Brossy consultant or Semler with any of the Company’s executive officers. The Committee concluded that there are no such conflicts of interest.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating Committee is charged with assessing existing directors to determine whether to recommend them for reelection to the Board, identifying and recruiting potential new directors, establishing a procedure for consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders, and recommending candidates to be nominated by the Board or elected by the Board, as necessary, to fill vacancies and newly created directorships. It also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the structure, composition, and functioning of the Board and its committees, and evaluates and recommends changes to the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominating Committee also annually reviews the independence of all directors and evaluates the Board’s performance.

The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and under the Company’s Independence Standards. The Nominating Committee is governed by a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The Nominating Committee’s current charter is available on the Company’s website,www.tejonranch.com, in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations webpage, and is available in print form upon request to the Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243.

The Nominating Committee is pleased to consider any properly submitted recommendations of director candidates from shareholders. Shareholders may recommend a candidate for consideration by the Nominating Committee by sending written notice addressed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair, c/o Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243. The Nominating Committee does not evaluate candidates differently based on who has made the recommendation. Shareholders may also nominate persons for election to the Board by providing timely notice in writing to the Secretary of the Company pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. See “Shareholder Proposals for 20212022 Annual Meeting” for additional information on the procedure for shareholder nominations.

The Nominating Committee has the authority under its charter to hire and pay a fee to outside counsel, experts, or other advisors to assist in the process of identifying and evaluating candidates. No such outside advisors were used during 2019,2020, and, accordingly, no fees were paid to such advisors during 2019.2020. Past practice has been for the Nominating Committee to seek recommendations for new directors from current directors, the CEO, and outside advisors.

The Real Estate Committee

The Real Estate Committee provides oversight, guidance, and strategic input into management plans and operations for development and entitlement of Company land. It reviews and either approves or recommends to the Board appropriate action on significant proposed real estate transactions and development proformas and budgets. It reports regularly to the full Board with respect to its meetings. The Real Estate Committee’s current charter is available on the Company’s website,www.tejonranch.com, in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations webpage, and is available in print form upon request to the Corporate Secretary, 4436 Lebec Rd., P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243.

The Investment Policy Committee

The Investment Policy Committee reviews policies and activities related to the investment of the Company’s assets. It receives and reviews the marketable securities investment policy and data regarding marketable security investments and recommends approval of the Company’s investment security policy to the Board.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all directors, officers, and employees. It also has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to guide its own operations. Both documents (including Attachment A to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which constitutes the Company’s Independence Standards) are available on the Company’sweb-site,www.tejonranch.com, in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations webpage, and are available in print form upon request to the Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243.

SUCCESSION PLANNING

The Board, with the assistance of the Compensation Committee, oversees succession plans for the CEO and other senior executive officers. These plans relate both to succession in emergency situations and longer-term succession. As set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s succession planning for senior executive officers at least annually. The CEO also provides the Board with input regarding these matters.

BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The full Board oversees the Company’s risk management process. The Board oversees a Company-wide approach to risk management, designed to enhance shareholder value, support the achievement of strategic objectives, and improve long-term organizational performance. The full Board determines the appropriate level of risk for the Company generally, assesses the specific risks faced by the Company, and reviews the steps taken by management to manage those risks. The full Board’s involvement in setting the Company’s business strategy facilitates these assessments and reviews, culminating in the development of a strategic plan that reflects both the Board’s and management’s consensus as to appropriate levels of risk and the appropriate measures to manage those risks. The full Board assesses risk throughout the enterprise, focusing on risks arising out of various aspects of the Company’s strategic plan and the implementation of that plan, including financial, legal/compliance, operational/strategic, cybersecurity and compensation risks. In addition to discussing risk with the full Board, the independent directors discuss risk management during executive sessions without management present.

While the full Board maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, its committees oversee risk in certain specified areas. In particular, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; focuses on financial risk, including

internal controls; and discusses the Company’s risk profile with the Company’s internal auditors. The Audit Committee also reviews potential violations of the Company’s Code of Ethics and related corporate policies. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews compensation practices and policies to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking. Finally, the Nominating Committee assesses the independence of directors and evaluates potential new Board nominees, which allows it to limit the risk associated with having conflicted or otherwise inappropriate directors. Pursuant to the Board’s instruction, management regularly reports on applicable risks to the relevant committee or the full Board, as appropriate, and additional review or reporting on risks is conducted as needed or as requested by the Board and its committees.

The Compensation Committee has also reviewed the design and operation of the Company’s compensation structures and policies as they pertain to risk and has determined that the Company’s compensation programs do not create or encourage the taking of risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides a detailed description of the objectives and principles of our executive compensation programs. It explains how compensation decisions are linked to performance as compared to Company performance and shareholder interests. The NEOs, for the 20192020 fiscal year are as follows.

 

  

Name

  

Title

Gregory S. Bielli

  

Chief Executive Officer

Allen E. Lyda

  

Chief Operating Officer/Former Chief Financial Officer *

Robert D. Velasquez

  

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer *

Hugh F. McMahon

  

Executive Vice President, Real Estate

Michael R.W. Houston

  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel *

 

*

Mr. Lyda served asHouston resigned from his position at the Company’s Chief Financial Officer untilCompany effective January 4, 2019, when he was appointed Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Velasquez was appointed to serve as Chief Financial Officer on January 4, 2019.31, 2021.

Executive Summary and Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program aligns with our strongpay-for-performance philosophy and ties a substantial portion of executive compensation to the achievement of annual and long-term strategic objectives directly linked to the creation of shareholder value. The objectives of our executive compensation program are to (i) drive performance against critical strategic goals designed to create long-term shareholder value through the enhancement of our land asset values and (ii) pay our executives at a level and in a manner that ensures Tejon Ranch is capable of attracting, motivating, and retaining top executive talent. At our 2019 Annual Meeting, our shareholders expressed support for our executive compensation program, with 93.7% of shareholders casting votes in favor of the advisory vote proposal.

We design our compensation programs to support our commitment to performance. We view our compensation program in three year increments tied to the time period of our milestone grants, which we make every three years. The current three year period is from 2017 to 2019.

The compensation program for our NEOs is designed to align management’s incentives with the long-term interests of our shareholders and to be competitive with comparable employers. Our compensation philosophy recognizes the value of rewarding our NEOs for their past performance and motivating them to continue to excel in the future. The Compensation Committee has developed and maintains a compensation program that rewards superior performance and seeks to encourage actions that drive our business strategy. Our compensation strategy is to provide a competitive opportunity for senior executives, taking into account their total compensation packages, which include a combination of base salary, an annual cash-based incentive bonus, and long-term performance-based and time-based equity awards. At the NEO level, a significant portion of our incentive compensation arrangements are designed to reward the achievement of long-term milestone objectives related to real estate development that are measurable and instrumental to our success. This will drive the creation of value, as well as the achievement ofyear-to-year operating performance goals. Our overall goal is to have variable compensation be 70% or more of target total compensation for the three-year period.

LOGO

Our performance milestones are tied to a variety of factors such as cash management, planning and design, achievement of land entitlements, successful defense of litigation against our entitlements, development of projects, and finally sales and leasing within the projects.

Our intention is to continue to strive to have variable compensation be the most significant component of our total compensation package.

Our primary business objective is to maximize long-term shareholder value through the monetization of our land-based assets. This is accomplished by moving ourDeveloping real estate assets up the value creation chainin California through the entitlement process,stage to development is a many year process. For this reason, the mapping process, development, and ultimately to sales and leasing. realization of our Company’s full asset value will come only in future years.

A key element of our strategy is to provide entitled land for large scale residential andmixed-use real estate communities to serve the growing population of Southern and Central California. We are currently engaged in commercial sales and leasing at our fully operational commercial/industrial centerwithin the Tejon Ranch Commerce Center, or TRCC, master plan, which includes commercial retail, industrial, and multifamily products, and are defending litigation, moving forward in the mapping and permitting process, and preparing for development within our three other major residentialmixed-use master planned communities Centennial, Grapevine, and Mountain Village. All of theseThese efforts are supported by diverse revenue streams generated from other operations, including farming, mineral resources, and our various joint ventures.

Currently our revenues are derived principally from commodity-based businesses such as farming, and mineral resources including water sales, as well as commercial real estate. Our long-term business plan is for our commercial and residential real estate assets to produce the vast majority of our revenues. Developing real estate assets in California through the entitlement stage to development is a many year process. For this reason, the realization of our Company’s full asset value will come only in future years.

The chart below is a continuum of the real estate development process highlighting each project’s current status and key milestones to be met in moving through the real estate development process in California. The real estate development process may be subject to delays arising from California’s complex regulatory structure and litigation environment. At each level of success, value is being created in each project due to the approvals received and to entitlement risks being removed and development approvals being achieved.

LOGOLOGO

Our long-term and short-term performance incentive plans are designed to reward the NEOs for success in moving projects forward along the above continuum. Success in achieving these performance objectives is critical to the creation of value within our land assets. Due to the long-term nature of the real estate development process in California, the increase in value of land within our projects is not immediately recognized in stock market value largely due to the timing of revenue generation, which does not begin to occur until the execution phase of development operations. Therefore, we measure and reward the progress based on achievement of milestone related goals rather than typical financial measures used by many companies.

We design our compensation programs to support our commitment to performance. We view our compensation program in three-year increments tied to the time period of our milestone grants, which we make every three years. Our performance milestones are tied to a variety of factors that will create long-term value for our shareholders such as cash management, planning and design, achievement of land entitlements, successful defense of litigation against our entitlements, development of projects, and finally sales and leasing within the projects. The current three-year measurement period is from 2020 to 2022.    

Executing2020 Operational and Financial Results

The impact of COVID-19 varied across our businesses, but primarily impacted our retail segment, which had a strong January and February, and then slowed down significantly in March. Some of our other business lines were not impacted by the pandemic such as our industrial retail activities. Others such as farming and mineral resources were indirectly impacted as oil supplies remained higher than normal. In addition, the almond and pistachio markets were impacted by restaurants and companies serving restaurants buying less than their historical levels. In response, the Company initiated cost reduction programs and implemented a voluntary pay reduction for senior management, which included a 10% base salary reduction for all of our NEOs that continued until the end of 2020. During this time, our teams quickly adapted to the new operating environment and incorporated new health and safety practices into all aspects of our business. Our priority was to keep employees, trade partners, and customers safe while continuing to focus on our Strategy—2019 Company Highlightsbusiness operations. As you will see below, the primary driver leading to lower net income and revenues is attributed to land sales and a joint venture land and building sale that did not occur during 2020.

•  On April 30, 2019, the Company received final approval of its Centennialmixed-use residential community upon completion of the finding of facts and the adoption of other resolutions by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. This also includes a Development Agreement between Los Angeles County and Centennial, which provides the Company with vested rights to build the project as approved for 30 years. With this approval, Centennial at Tejon Ranch achieved local legislative approval for the building of 19,333 residential units and more than 10.1 million square feet of commercial space.

•  In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company’sTRC-MRC 3 joint venture, a partnership with Majestic Realty Co. for the development, construction, leasing and management of a 579,040 square foot industrial building on the Company’s property at TRCC-East, completed construction of the building and will deliver space to a tenant that has entered into a lease agreement occupying 67% of the total rentable space.

•  For 2020, net loss attributable to common shareholders was $740,000, representing a net loss per share of $0.03, compared with net income attributable to common shareholders of $10,580,000, or $0.40, for fiscal 2019.

 

•  The CompanyRevenues and other income, including equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, were $44,549,000 in fiscal 2020, a decline of $22,788,000, or 34%, compared to $67,337,000 in 2019. We also completed the shell and coresaw a $12,071,000 decrease in earnings of a new 4,900 square foot multi-tenant retail building at TRCC-East in the fourth quarter of 2019 to further expand its footprint at TRCC. In December 2019, the Company contributed this multi-tenant building and underlying land to ourunconsolidated joint venture with TravelCenters of America, and received cash distribution from the joint venture for $2,805,000 as our contribution value.

•  On December 10, 2019, the Kern County Board of Supervisors reviewed the supplementalre-circulated EIR prepared in responseventures, which was primarily attributable to a court ruling$9,121,000 decrease in revenue generated by Five West Parcel, LLC as a result of its land and unanimously reapproved the development of Grapevine,building asset being sold in 2019, along with a Development Agreement.$3,088,000 decline in our share of earnings from our TA/Petro joint venture driven by declines in volume and fuel margins as a result of COVID-19 and California’s stay at home orders. Commercial/industrial segment revenues declined $7,256,000. The decline is primarily attributed to the fact that in 2019 there were several major real estate asset contributions and sales made by the Company to its joint ventures for $6,621,000 that did not occur in 2020. Farming revenues saw a $5,465,000 decrease in revenue as a result of lower almond prices, reduced pistachio bonus payments and production, as well as reduced grape revenues due to a lower number of acres in production. These declines in revenue were partially offset by improved mineral resources revenues of $945,000 as a result of water sales increasing $1,912,000 over the prior year as a result of improved sales driven by a dry water year in California. Offsetting this increase was a significant decline in oil royalty revenue as production declined due to lower prices that reduced our production levels. Please refer to our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details regarding our 2020 operations. See the following chart for a summary of revenues:

2019 Operational and Financial Results

Improvements in revenue and net income during 2019 led to EBITDA and Total Revenue and Other Income, which are the annual corporate incentive bonus quantitative metrics, being above the target goal levels for revenue and above maximum goal levels for EBITDA. These metrics are discussed below under “Annual Incentive Plan.” The Company also met the 2017-2019 rolling three-year cash flow objectives at 175.62% of the target award level. The rolling three-year cash flow metric is described in the equity compensation section.

    

• For 2019, net income attributable to common shareholders was $10,580,000, representing net income per share diluted of $0.40, compared with net income attributable to common shareholders of $4,255,000, or $0.16, for fiscal 2018.

   

• Revenues and other income, including equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, were $67,337,000 in fiscal 2019, an increase of $16,540,000, or 30%, compared with $50,797,000 million in 2018. We also saw a $12,741,000 increase in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, which was primarily attributable to an $8,730,000 increase generated by Five West Parcel, LLC from the gain recognized on disposition of its building and land, along with a $3,007,000 increase in our share of earnings from our TA/Petro joint venture driven by improved fuel margins. Commercial/industrial segment revenues increased $7,822,000, or 87.2%, from $8,970,000 in 2018 to $16,792,000. The increase was primarily attributable to improved land sale revenues of $6,621,000 recognized from two land and building contributions to the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures during 2019. These improvements were offset by reduced mineral resources revenues of $4,604,000 resulting from a lack of water sales opportunities as a result of the wet 2019 winter rain season. Please refer to our 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K for additional details regarding our 2019 operations. See the following chart for a summary of revenues:

   

  2019   2018   2020   2019 

Total operating revenues

  $49,523,000   $45,619,000   $37,830,000   $49,523,000 

Investment Income

   1,239,000    1,344,000 
Investment income   884,000    1,239,000 
Gain on sale of real estate   1,331,000    0 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net

   16,575,000    3,834,000    4,504,000    16,575,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Revenue and Other Income

  $

 

67,337,000

 

 

 

  $

 

50,797,000

 

 

 

  $44,549,000   $67,337,000 
  

 

   

 

 

Pay-for-Performance

Consistent with ourpay-for-performance philosophy, Company financial performance in 2019, as well as over the 2017-2019 measurement period,2020 directly impacted incentive payouts for 2019,2020, as follows:

 

Annual Incentive Plan. Improvements in total revenue and net income during 2019 led to adjusted EBITDA and total revenues, the annual corporate incentive bonus quantitative metrics, being above the target goal levels for 2019 and also above 2018 actuals. Our annual short-term milestones were

 

achieved at 70%Annual Cash Incentives. Declines in total revenue and a net loss during 2020 led to adjusted EBITDA, the annual corporate incentive bonus quantitative metric, falling between threshold and target ranges for 2020 (without any adjustments for the impact of the target goal. These metrics and short-term milestones areCOVID-19). This metric is discussed below under “Annual Performance-Based Incentives.Incentive Plan.

 

2017-2019 Cashflow Performance Shares. The NEOs met the 2017 rolling three-year cash flow objectives at 175.62% of the target award level, resulting in maximum award achievement. The rolling three-year cash flow metric is described in “Equity Compensation beginning on page 49. The grants associated with the 2017 three-year cash flow metric were paid out during March 2020. The number of stock units that vested in 2020 are identified in the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 FiscalYear-End table that begins on page 58.

Annual Short-term Milestone Objectives. Short-term milestones are generally items identified each year that are critical to the Company’s long-term objectives. For 2020, there were three milestone objectives with two being achieved at target and one at 75% of target. More information is provided on these milestone objectives within the Annual Incentive Plan section.

 

2017-2019 Performance Milestone Grants. In 2017 three performance milestone goals were established. Of the three goals the NEOs achieved maximum performance related to one goal and did not meet threshold performance for the other goals. A description of the performance milestone goals are included in the “Equity Compensation” section beginning

2018-2020 Cashflow Performance Shares. The NEOs met the 2018 rolling three-year cash flow objectives at 175.58% of the target award level, resulting in maximum award achievement (without any adjustments for the impact of COVID-19). The rolling three-year cash flow metric is described in the Equity Compensation section. The grants associated with the 2018 three-year cash flow metric were paid out during March 2021. The number of stock units that vested in 2021 are identified in the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End table that begins on page 49. The vested grants associated with achievement of the one goal were paid out during March 2020. The number of stock units that vested in 2020 are identified in the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 FiscalYear-End table that begins on page 58.

2020 – The Year Ahead

The Company believes 2020 will be a challenging year as we defend litigation within our Centennial and Grapevine projects and in terms of the commodity markets we operate in as we see continued pressure on crop prices due to potential increases in supply and reduced oil prices may impact production from lessees. For 2020, we do expect crop production to improve as it will be the up year in the production cycle for pistachios. Thus far the 2020 winter has been dryer than the previous year, but it is still too early to determine any impact this may have on the quantity of water to be sold during 2020 and prices received for water sold. We continue to push forward with our marketing plans within TRCC to build upon our 2019 activity, but it is difficult to predict new sale and lease activity.

Overall Compensation Plan Design and Core Tenets

The compensation policies developed by the Compensation Committee are based on the philosophy that compensation should reflect both financial and operational performance of the Company, the success of the Company in achieving real estate development milestones, and the individual performance of each executive. The Compensation Committee also believes that long-term incentives should be a significant factor in determining compensation, particularly because the business of real estate land development, including obtaining complex entitlement approvals, managing the litigation process, completing development, and many of the other actions and decisions of our NEOs requires an extended time horizon before the Company realizes a tangible financial benefit. The stock price of the Company is also important to ensure alignment between executive compensation and in 2019shareholder interests, and during 2020 the Compensation Committee, with guidance from the Committee’s compensation consultant, has designedcompleted the design of a performancenew stock grant program that incorporates stock performance intoin the long-term incentive plan.determination of future vesting of the grants issued. The new long-term incentive planstock performance grants made in 2020 will become effective for 2020 and will cover years 2020-2022.

The following core tenets inform the design of our compensation plan.be measured in 2022.

 

 

  Competitive Pay Opportunity

 

✓ We pay competitively to attract, motivate, and retain the executives who drive our success and industry leadership.

 

 

  Equity Incentives

 

✓ A significant percentage of annual target pay opportunity is in equity to incentivize a long-term focus and promote strong alignment with shareholders.

 

 

  Sustainable Long-Term Performance

 

✓ A large majority of total pay is subject to multi-year vesting or performance requirements.

 

 

  Explicit Pay and Performance Link

 

✓  We explicitly tie pay to performance by delivering a large majority of pay through performance-based cash and equity incentives.

 

 

  Compensation Governance

✓ We discourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking through our vesting and stockholding requirements and clawback provisions.

 

The following core tents inform the design of our compensation plan.

The principles of our pay philosophy influence the design and administration of our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee uses several components of pay that are linked to both our long-term and short-term performance in the executive compensation programs, including long-term incentives, annual cash incentives, base pay, and benefits. The chart below illustrates the linkage between the vehicles of pay we use and our pay principles.

 

Pay Principles

  

 

Long–term

Incentives

  

 

Annual Cash

Incentives

  Base Pay  Benefits

 

Total compensation should reinforce business objectives and values.

 

        

A significant portion of an NEO’s total compensation should be variable and based on company and individual performance.

 

          

Incentive compensation should balance long-term, intermediate, and short-term performance.

 

          

Incentive compensation should align the interests of NEO’s with shareholders.

 

          

Compensation should foster a culture of collaboration which shares focus and commitment to our Company.Company

 

          

Compensation opportunities should be competitive.

 

        

A portion of compensation should provide NEOs with a stable predictable source of income and benefits.

 

        

  

Our Executive Compensation Best Practices

 

 

WHAT WE DO

 

  

 

WHAT WE DO NOT DO

 

  

✓ Utilize multiple performance metrics in our incentive plans tied to our short- and long-term goals equity vehicles

 

  

Ó  Do not provideNo taxgross-ups for executive officers on perquisites orchange-in-control severance payments

 

  

✓ Employ commonobjective short-term goals for the majority of our NEOs’ bonus opportunities

 

  

Ó  Do not allowNo hedging of TRC stock

  

✓ Provide a majority of equity compensation opportunity through performance-based goalscompensation elements

 

  

Ó  Do not allowNo pledging of TRC stock

  

✓ Align a significant portion of long-term equity opportunity to project milestones that are linked to shareholder value creation

 

  

Ó  Do not allowNo holding of TRC stock in margin accounts

  

✓ Adhere toMaintain an executive compensation recovery or clawback,(clawback) policy to ensure accountability

 

  

Ó  Do not repriceNo repricing or replacereplacing underwater equity awards

  

✓ Require executives and directors to own Company stock to reinforce the alignment of their interests with those of our shareholders

  

Ó  Do not provideNo “single trigger” cash severance based solely upon a change in control of the Company.control. Beginning in 2019, allno new stock grants provide a double trigger in case ofwith automatic “single trigger” vesting upon a change in control of the Company

 

  

✓ Utilize an independent compensation consultant who reports directly to the Compensation Committee

 

  

Ó  Do not provideNo large bonus payouts without justifiable performance linkage

  

✓ Recognize an independent Chairman of the Board in our corporate governance structure

 

  

Ó  Do not provideNo guaranteed bonuses

  

✓ Provide an annual shareholder “say on pay” vote

  

Ó  Do not timeNo timing of equity awards in coordination with the release of materialnon-public information

 

  

✓ Conduct an Annual Compensation Risk Assessment

 

   

2020 Executive Compensation Plan Framework

Our variable compensation consists of two programs: the annual incentive plan (“AIP”), which is an annual cash incentive program, and the long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”), which consists of performance-based and time-based equity vehicles.

Our AIP has three primary performance measures:

1.

Achievement of targeted adjusted EBITDA, which reflects our annual operating budget.

2.

Achievement of annual corporate milestone goals, which are defined each year.

3.

Individual goals, which are defined each year.

Our LTIP consists of three equity delivery vehicles:

1.

Project-related milestone grants are awarded once every three years and are tied to specific business objectives related to our real estate development strategy. The Compensation Committee believes that accomplishing these goals are paramount to creating value in our land asset and achieving our long-term real estate development goals. The value of the milestone grants are three times that of an award that would normally be granted every year. The performance milestone focus is on identifying development projects, protecting and developing water assets, securing entitlement, permit, and mapping approvals, project implementation, and financing for our real estate holdings. These milestone performance grants have specific defined goals that are measurable and not subjective. This component of our LTIP delivers 35% of the CEO’s and 55% of the other NEOs’ long-term compensation opportunity over a 3-year period. Performance milestone grants for the three-year measurement period beginning in 2020 are described in more detail below.

2.

Price-Vested Units are awarded annually and tied to stock price achievement. These grants vest at the end of three years based on stock price performance. This component of our LTIP delivers 15% of the long-term compensation opportunity.

3.

Time-vested restricted stock units are the final component of our LTIP. This element in the plan design recognizes the inherent risk in large-scale land development and helps balance the performance orientation of our approach with the objective of retaining our executive team. Further, time vested restricted stock units underscore an ownership orientation on the part of our executives. The grants vest one-third each year for three years. This component of our LTIP delivers 50% of the long-term compensation opportunity for the CEO and 30% of the long-term compensation for the other NEOs.

The Compensation Committee believes that long-term performance award design reflects the value creation process inherent in large-scale land development by first identifying projects, securing complex entitlements, managing litigation, mapping projects, and then developing the projects to maximize financial returns. Please refer to earlier graphic describing the land entitlement and development process within California.

For the 2020-2022 long-term incentive plan measurement period the CEO’s equity awards are intended to cover three years of grants for each equity award vehicle. The Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

Pay Mix Analysis

The target mix of total direct compensation elements for our CEO and NEOs, as a percentage of total compensation, is set forth in the tables below. We show a three-year period to account for the granting of project milestone equity performance grants that occurs once every three years and occurred in 2020. A significant percentage of our compensation is delivered through variable cash and equity, with over 50% of our CEOs target compensation provided through equity incentives.

LOGO

Named Executive Officer—Target Mix

  Base
Salary
   
AIP
   LTIP 

CEO 3-Year Target (1)

  

 

19%

 

  

 

24%

 

  

 

57%

 

Other NEOs 3-Year Target (1)

  

 

34%

 

  

 

23%

 

  

 

43%

 

1.

New three-year measurement period is based on 2020 target compensation.

2020 Say on Pay Vote

At our 2020 Annual Meeting, our shareholders expressed support for our executive compensation program, with 78.8% of shareholders casting votes in favor of the advisory vote proposal. No changes were made to our executive compensation program as a result of the advisory vote.

Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee seeks to create a compensation plan that is balanced in its use of short-term and long-term compensation elements in order to align management’s incentives with the long-term interests of our shareholders and the development of our land assets. In developing the compensation plan, the Compensation Committee seeks to be aware of changing economic and industry conditions, as well as changing compensation trends. To achieve these objectives, the plan uses a variety of compensation elements as described below.

   Compensation Component

Objective

Characteristics

  Base Salary

Provide a fundamental level of compensation to the NEOs for performing their roles and assuming their levels of responsibility.

Fixed cash component annually reviewed and adjusted from time to time based on individual performance and peer group analysis.

  Annual Incentive Bonus

Drive the achievement of performance goals in a particular fiscal year.

Annual incentive bonuses are paid in cash. This performance-based bonus opportunity is based on the achievement of quantitative and qualitative goals. Performance period is one year.

  Long-Term

  Incentive Compensation

Promote the achievement of our long-term financial goals and development milestone goals to create value by aligning NEO and shareholder interests, promoting NEO retention, and rewarding NEOs for performance over time.

Long-term incentive compensation is in the form of performance shares, price-vested units, and time-vested awards. The payout of performance shares is based on the achievement of targets set by the Compensation Committee to the achievement of measurable milestone goals related to development. Price-vested units are tied to appreciation of stock price. Performance period for performance shares and price-vested units is three years. Time-vesting awards vest equally over three years.

Base Salaries

When establishing base salaries, the Compensation Committee takes into account each NEO’s performance of his role and responsibilities and, to the extent useful, the range of compensation of comparable executives in our peer group. The Compensation Committee believes that compensation objectives are effectively met when a majority of an executive’s compensation is composed of performance-based bonuses and long-term incentive compensation, rather than fixed compensation such as base salaries. We believe that having the overall compensation emphasis on long-term equity incentives instead of short-term fixed compensation better aligns management with shareholders.

The Compensation Committee approved the following 2019 and 2020 base salaries for our NEOs.

Name  

2019

Annual Base

Salary

   

2020

Annual Base

Salary

   

2020*

Actual

Salary

   

2019-2020 Base
Salary

Percent Increase

Gregory S. Bielli

  

$

675,000

 

  

$

700,000

 

  

$

653,333

 

  

3.7%

Allen E. Lyda

  

$

350,000

 

  

$

360,500

 

  

$

336,467

 

  

3.0%

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

265,000

 

  

$

272,950

 

  

$

254,753

 

  

3.0%

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

263,210

 

  

$

271,106

 

  

$

253,032

 

  

3.0%

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

269,216

 

  

$

277,292

 

  

$

258,806

 

  

3.0%

*

As part of our response to COVID-19 and the reduction of staffing costs the NEOs beginning May 2020 took a voluntary 10% decrease in salary for the remainder of 2020.

For 2020, the Compensation Committee after review of peer group data, relevant industry data, and input from our compensation consultant determined that Mr. Bielli’s base salary would be increased to stay competitive with current market expectations. When granting the salary increases for 2020 for the other NEOs, the Compensation Committee, along with the Chief Executive Officer, performed an annual review of each of the other NEOs’ salaries and evaluated changes to base salary. This review considered several factors, including peer group information, the market for similar job functions, the economic environment, changes in job responsibilities, and the general experience of the Compensation Committee members.

Annual Incentive Plan

Tejon’s practice is to award annual incentive bonuses based upon the achievement of performance objectives established at the beginning of each year.

The attainment of each year’s quantitative financial goals for each of the NEOs is uncertain and is dependent upon factors such as real estate sales and leasing programs, the timing of entitlement activities for our developments, and the uncertainty inherent in our farming and mineral operations due to the commodity nature of the products we produce and the fact that we do not know the production each year or the ultimate price we will receive for our products each year. The achievement of individual objectives tied to land entitlement, development, and conservation efforts is highly dependent on working with groups outside of the Company, such as government agencies, local county planning departments, and environmental resource groups, all of which make the timing of achieving specific steps in the process very complicated. Accordingly, goal achievement under the annual bonus plan is not guaranteed.

The following chart provides the performance level weightings for the Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs.

Weighted Measures  Gregory S.
Bielli
Chief
Executive
Officer
 Allen E.
Lyda
Chief
Operating
Officer
 Robert D.
Velasquez
SVP
Chief
Financial
Officer
 

Hugh F.
McMahon
EVP
Real

Estate

 Michael
R. W.
Houston
SVP
General
Counsel
  

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

Adjusted EBITDA

  40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

  

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

Kern LAFCO approval of TCWD Annexation 8 to be completed fourth quarter 2020

  

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

Fully lease new 580,000 square foot building third quarter of 2020

  

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

Approval by Real Estate Committee of new speculative building development fourth quarter 2020

  13.33% 13.33% 13.33% 13.33% 13.33%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

  

Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements

Individual Objectives

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Divisional Quantitative/Qualitative Weighting

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Weighting

  100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Generally, the Chief Executive Officer’s individual objectives are tied to land entitlement, public outreach in support of entitlement, and development and conservation goals as well as operational, strategic planning, and staffing objectives. The individual objectives for the other NEOs are generally related to land entitlement, development, and operational goals that support the achievement of corporate entitlement and development goals.

The annual incentive plan is structured, and bonus levels are determined based upon the level of achievement of threshold, target, and maximum performance of quantitative and qualitative objectives. If achievement of a performance objective is below threshold, no incentive bonus is earned for that objective, and if achievement is greater than maximum, the maximum bonus level is earned. The Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs have different cash incentive opportunity levels, which are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The target bonus levels expressed as percentage of base salary are in line with information provided by our independent compensation consultant.

The threshold, target, and maximum levels (expressed as a percentage of base salary) are outlined below.

   Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

  

 

62.50

 

 

125.00

 

 

187.50

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

 

45.00

 

 

90.00

 

 

135.00

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

 

25.00

 

 

50.00

 

 

75.00

Hugh F. McMahon, EVP, Real Estate

  

 

35.00

 

 

70.00

 

 

105.00

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

 

30.00

 

 

60.00

 

 

90.00

Quantitative Financial Goal – Corporate

We measure adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of our financial performance relative to budget and our ability to fund our real estate development activities. Our definition of adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, abandonment charges, and non-cash stock compensation. We believe adjusted EBITDA provides a good indicator of management’s creation of operating cash, which is critical to the funding of our entitlement and development efforts, since the Company has significant non-cash expenses each year. The following table outlines adjusted EBITDA results for 2020. Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes includes only company specific operations and not the add back of our share of unconsolidated joint venture depreciation, amortization, and interest expense. Therefore, this number is different from the numbers shown in the 2020 Annual Report and Form 10-K, Non-GAAP measures.

Quantitative Goal

 2019
Actual
  2020
Threshold
  2020
Target
  2020
Maximum
  2020
Actual
  % of
Target
 

Adjusted EBITDA *

 

$

23,158,000

 

 

$

8,318,000

 

 

$

11,090,000

 

 

$

16,635,000

 

 

$

8,630,000

 

 

 

77.82

%   

The adjusted EBITDA targets is set based on the Company’s 2020 business plan and operating budget. The Compensation Committee uses data from each year’s annual budget because it is a reflection of what the Company believes will happen in the coming year based on an analysis of the commodity markets we operate in, anticipated weather patterns that impact our agricultural operations, and sales/leasing activity within TRCC. Importantly, no adjustments were made to the 2020 target or results to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on Company performance.

The budgeted target goal for 2020 was less than the prior year actuals due largely to 2019 including several land contribution transactions and a land and building sale in one of the joint ventures the Company is a member in. When preparing the 2020 business plan and operating budget we did not expect to duplicate 2019 real estate transaction activity. The tables below reflect actual achievement shown in the format used by the Company internally to measure NEOs performance compared to the approved 2020 operating budget.

* Adjusted EBITDA Actual 2020 Calculation (non-GAAP):

 

Income before income tax

  

$

82,000

 

Interest, net

  

 

(884,000

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

4,938,000

 

Stock compensation expense

   4,494,000 
  

 

 

 

Total Adjusted EBITDA

  

$

8,630,000

 

  

 

 

 

Short-Term Milestone Objectives – Corporate

Annual short-term milestone corporate objectives are generally those items identified each year that are critical to successfully moving forward the Company’s long-term objectives related to land entitlement and development within our four development projects.

For 2020 the short-term objectives were as follows:

Work with the Tejon-Castac Water District, or TCWD, to achieve approval from the Kern County LAFCo (Local Agency Formation Commission) to annex land within Kern County and Los Angeles County to include the Centennial Development. The importance of this objective was to expand the service area of TCWD to include Centennial so that there will be uniformity of services within all four of our master planned developments as all will now be served by TCWD. This objective was completed during the fourth quarter of 2020, so target goal achievement was met.

Fully lease the new 580,000 square foot building completed in 2019 by the end of the third quarter of 2020. This goal is critical to our continued development of new buildings and monetizing our land asset with TRCC. Full lease up of the building was achieved during the second quarter of 2020. As a result, we were deemed to have met the goal at target achievement.

Receive approval from the Real Estate Committee of the Company for the speculative development of a new industrial building to be achieved by the fourth quarter of 2020. We did not receive final approval of the Real Estate Committee during the fourth quarter of 2020 but due to the level of progress made in the site design, engineering, building design, and permit approvals from Kern County, and an earlier preliminary approval from the Real Estate Committee that limited action to design, engineering, and permitting. The Compensation Committee determined that this objective was met at 75% of target achievement.

Individual Performance Objectives

In addition to the goals described above, the CEO and each NEO also has individual performance objectives. The CEO’s individual performance objectives are proposed by the CEO and agreed upon and approved by the Compensation Committee. These objectives are tied to business development and organizational goals that move the Company forward in achieving its long-term objectives. Individual goals for our CEO in 2020 specifically related to:

leading and directing a ranch-wide strategy to facilitate future successful entitlement of our development projects, implementation of strategic business plans for master planned communities,

overseeing implementation of strategic business plans for master planned communities with a focus on execution,

overseeing succession plans for key departments,

overseeing our corporate wide cost control program,

COVID-19 response.

Based on management’s proactive response to the COVID-19 pandemic, guidance in setting the stage for approval of the TRCC residential multi-family conditional use permit received January 2021, and continued reduction in controllable costs, the Compensation Committee determined that the CEO’s individual performance was at the maximum achievement.

The other NEOs individual performance goals are generally tied to individual areas of responsibility, which focus on both short-term and long-term goals (including improving operational efficiencies and achieving short-term milestones and other goals with respect to the Company’s long-term business strategy related to land entitlement, development, and conservation). Generally, the qualitative goals covered:

•  Coordination and management of litigation strategies involving Mountain Village, Centennial, and Grapevine.

•  Guiding the Company in working with various government agencies as a part of the permitting process.

•  Management of water resources and development of groundwater sustainability plans.

•  Expansion of TRCC water facilities in preparation for future industrial and commercial retail absorption.

•  Meeting implementation dates related to farm developments.

•  Analysis of future staffing requirements to meet near-term and long-term needs as the Company moves forward with its land entitlement and development plans.

The CEO and the Compensation Committee evaluate the success of the other NEOs in meeting their individual performance objectives, with final approval provided by the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee note whether each objective was accomplished in the time frame designated and if the outcome achieved was as specified in the original objective. The individual payouts as a percentage of target are shown in the table below.

2020 Performance Achievement

The following chart provides a breakdown of 2020 annual incentive award measurement by performance measurement category and the total 2020 incentive award as a percentage of salary. Final award measurement for the NEOs reflects actual results.

Weighted Measures  

Gregory S.

Bielli Chief

Executive

Officer

  

Allen E.

Lyda EVP Chief

Operating

Officer

  

Robert D.
Velasquez
SVP

Chief Financial
Officer

  

Hugh F.

McMahon

EVP

Commercial

  

Michael R.W
Houston

SVP
General
Counsel

 
   Corporate Quantitative Measurements 

Adjusted EBITDA

   40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00

Results as % of Target

   55.64  55.64  55.64  55.64  55.64
                     

Weighted Total (1)

   22.26  22.26  22.26  22.26  22.26
   Corporate Short-Term Objectives 

Blended Short-Term Objectives

   40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00

Results as % of Target

   91.68  91.68  91.68  91.68  91.68
                     

Weighted Total (1)

   36.67  36.37  36.67  36.67  36.67
   Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements: 
                     

Individual Objectives

   20.00  20.00  20.00  20.00  20.00

Results as % of Target (2)

   150.00  141.45  135.00  135.00  134.38
                     

Weighted Total (1)

   30.00  28.29  27.00  27.00  26.88
   Total 

Total Incentive Award as a Percentage of Target

   88.93  86.92  85.93  85.93  85.81
                     

Total Incentive Award as a Percentage of Salary

   111.15  78.23  42.96  60.15  51.48
                     

(1)

Weighted total is calculated as the performance objective times the performance achievement factor.

(2)

Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of overall individual performance and management’s successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic the Compensation Committee rewarded the CEO with the maximum individual objective award and the other NEO’s with a 35% increase in their individual objective results.

Equity Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that the long-term value of the Company will be driven by the execution of its long-term strategies. Accordingly, Tejon uses long-term equity incentives to align senior management’s interests with shareholders’ interests. The Compensation Committee believes that management should own stock and that teamwork among the management group is important in meeting business goals. Therefore, long-term milestone incentives are goal-based, with common performance measures for all participants to encourage teamwork.

Long-Term Equity
Compensation Vehicle
  Grant
Frequency
  

CEO

Weighting

  

Other
NEO’s

Weighting

  Vesting  Purpose
Performance Related Milestone Grants  Every three years  35%  55%  

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

 

  To tie equity compensation to longer-term real estate development milestones
Price Vesting Units  

Every three years – CEO

Annually – other NEOs

  15%  15%  

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

 

  To measure and tie equity compensation opportunity to stock price appreciation
Time-Vested Restricted Stock  

Every three years – CEO

Annually – other NEOs

 

  50%  30%  Three-year prorated vesting  To encourage share ownership and retention of executives

When granting shares whether the shares are performance or time vested, the Company’s practice is to determine annually a dollar amount of equity compensation to be provided, and to grant a number of performance shares and time vested shares that have a fair market value equal to that amount on the date of grant.

For the 2020-2022 long-term incentive plan measurement period the CEO’s equity awards are intended to cover three years of grants for each equity award vehicle. The Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

At the end of 2019, the Board of the Company, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the 2020-2022 performance milestone measurement objectives that will be used to measure the vesting of performance milestone grants. The objectives are:

1.

Complete a sale of an asset or other capital generating or liquidity event that generates at least $100 million in proceeds (if a combination of sources, not more than 50% from debt sources) to the Company for use in TRCC, Mountain Village, Centennial or as the Board of Directors deems appropriate. The achievement of this goal is extremely important in moving to the execution phase of development for the projects just identified. At this time this goal has not been accomplished but efforts are ongoing to complete.

2.

Successfully re-entitle the Grapevine project and complete California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, litigation stage within Superior Court by the end of 2022. Goal achievement is essential to moving this project forward through the permitting and mapping process and preparation for future development. Current status is on January 22, 2021 the Superior Court ruled in favor of the Company and Kern County on all issues and directed the Company and Kern County to prepare a final judgement reflecting its ruling in favor of the Company.

3.

Successfully complete CEQA litigation stage within Superior Court for the Centennial project by the end of 2022. Centennial is our development in Los Angeles County and success with this litigation will

allow us to begin mapping and permitting efforts for the development, which will move us closer to the beginning of development. Thus far this goal has not been accomplished but the court has held three hearings regarding this litigation on September 30, 2020, November 13, 2020, and January 8, 2021, but has not yet issued a ruling or judgment.

Shares associated with the above performance milestones were granted in March 2020 with a target vesting date of December 2022. These shares cliff vest at the end of three years based on performance and are either achieved or forfeited. There is no maximum or threshold level achievement. Exception is Milestone 1 above, which if achieved prior to December 31, 2021, target shares are adjusted up by 25%. If Milestone 1 is achieved between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 there is no adjustment to shares. The following table identifies the target value and target shares granted in 2020, representing three years’ worth of long-term incentive grants based on performance of milestones at target:

    

Target

Value

   

Target

Shares

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

$

2,170,000

 

  

 

153,574

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

$

892,238

 

  

 

63,145

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

450,368

 

  

 

31,873

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

670,987

 

  

 

47,487

 

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

457,532

 

  

 

32,380

 

During 2020, new price-vested units that are tied to stock price appreciation over the next three years were granted. For measurement purposes target achievement represents a 5% CAGR from the grant price and maximum payout is two times the grant price upon the measurement date at the end of 2022. Grant date price was $14.13 resulting in a target share price of $16.37. The price-vested units replace the performance grants tied to a cash flow metric.

Name  Target
Value
   Target
Shares
 

Gregory S. Bielli *

  

$

930,000

 

  

 

65,817

 

Allen E. Lyda,

  

$

81,113

 

  

 

5,740

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

40,943

 

  

 

2,898

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

60,999

 

  

 

4,317

 

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

41,594

 

  

 

2,944

 

*

The CEO’s grant represents three years’ worth of price-vested units and the Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

Annual performance shares granted prior to 2020 were tied to the achievement of a rolling three-year cash flow metric. This performance metric was selected by the Compensation Committee as a measurement of management’s ability to create operating cash over an extended period at a time when cash demands will be high and net income will not be significant. These grants vest at the end of a three-year performance period. The number of shares to be received is determined by the extent of performance achievement and can range from zero shares to the maximum award amount, which is 150% of the target award.

For the 2018-2020 period, the goal for cumulative cash from operations was $32,727,000. For the 2018-2020 period, goal achievement was 175.58% of the target objective, with actual cumulative cash from operations of $57,461,000 (without any adjustments to mitigate the impact of COVID-19). Maximum achievement is capped at 150% of target. These grants, which are referenced in footnote 2 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End table that begins on page 49, vested, and were delivered in early March 2021 after approval by the Compensation Committee.

Actual shares earned in respect of 2018-2020 three-year cash flow performance shares are as follows:

Name  Target
Shares
   Vested
Shares
   Value at Vesting-2021 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

  

 

22,153

 

  

 

33,230

 

  

$

555,606

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

 

8,640

 

  

 

12,960

 

  

$

216,691

 

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

 

4,491

 

  

 

6,737

 

  

$

112,643

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

  

 

6,793

 

  

 

10,190

 

  

$

170,377

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel*

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

$

-

 

*

Mr. Houston forfeited shares when he left the Company as the vesting date was after the date he left.

The table below summarizes the outstanding (as of the end of 2020) cash flow performance share measurement goals.

(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Grants

  Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual 

2018-2020 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

16,364

 

  

$

32,727

 

  

$

49,091

 

  $57,461 

2019-2021 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

14,985

 

  

$

29,970

 

  

$

44,955

 

   TBD 

During 2020, the Compensation Committee granted time-vested restricted stock to the NEOs. This element is seen as a balance to the strong performance orientation of both the LTIP and the annual incentive program, with the objective of retaining our executive team.

Name  Grant Value   Grant Shares 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer *

  

$

3,100,000

 

  

 

219,391

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

$

162,225

 

  

 

11,481

 

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

$

81,885

 

  

 

5,795

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

  

$

121,998

 

  

 

8,634

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

$

83,188

 

  

 

5,887

 

*

As noted earlier,The CEO’s grant represents three years’ worth of time-vested restricted stock and the Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

The Role of the Compensation Committee in Setting Compensation

The Compensation Committee completes a review each year of our compensation plan to ensure we are paying competitively, equitably, and in a way that encourages and rewards performance. Although the Compensation Committee reviews Peer Group data, relevant industry market data, and input from our compensation consultant as it determines compensation plans, other considerations are taken into account. Market data alone does not reflect the strategic value of various roles within our Company. Other considerations when making pay decisions for NEOs, include individual experience, sustained performance, historical pay, and realized and realizable pay over three years.

The Compensation Committee of the Board approves all compensation and awards to senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee independently reviews and establishes the compensation levels of the Chief Executive Officer; it also reviews the performance of the

Chief Executive Officer and discusses his performance with him. At the beginning of the year, the Chief

Executive Officer works with the Compensation Committee to establish his goals and objectives to be evaluated throughout the year. For the remaining executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations as to compensation levels, including grants of equity awards, for final approval by the Compensation Committee.

Pay Mix Analysis

The Roletarget mix of total direct compensation elements for our CEO and NEOs, as a percentage of total compensation, is set forth in the tables below. We show a three-year period to account for the granting of project milestone equity performance grants that occurs once every three years and occurred in 2020. A significant percentage of our compensation is delivered through variable cash and equity, with over 50% of our CEOs target compensation provided through equity incentives.

LOGO

Named Executive Officer—Target Mix

  Base
Salary
   
AIP
   LTIP 

CEO 3-Year Target (1)

  

 

19%

 

  

 

24%

 

  

 

57%

 

Other NEOs 3-Year Target (1)

  

 

34%

 

  

 

23%

 

  

 

43%

 

1.

New three-year measurement period is based on 2020 target compensation.

2020 Say on Pay Vote

At our 2020 Annual Meeting, our shareholders expressed support for our executive compensation program, with 78.8% of shareholders casting votes in favor of the advisory vote proposal. No changes were made to our executive compensation program as a result of the advisory vote.

Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee seeks to create a compensation plan that is balanced in its use of short-term and long-term compensation elements in order to align management’s incentives with the long-term interests of our shareholders and the development of our land assets. In developing the compensation plan, the Compensation Committee seeks to be aware of changing economic and industry conditions, as well as changing compensation trends. To achieve these objectives, the plan uses a variety of compensation elements as described below.

   Compensation Component

Objective

Characteristics

  Base Salary

Provide a fundamental level of compensation to the NEOs for performing their roles and assuming their levels of responsibility.

Fixed cash component annually reviewed and adjusted from time to time based on individual performance and peer group analysis.

  Annual Incentive Bonus

Drive the achievement of performance goals in a particular fiscal year.

Annual incentive bonuses are paid in cash. This performance-based bonus opportunity is based on the achievement of quantitative and qualitative goals. Performance period is one year.

  Long-Term

  Incentive Compensation

Promote the achievement of our long-term financial goals and development milestone goals to create value by aligning NEO and shareholder interests, promoting NEO retention, and rewarding NEOs for performance over time.

Long-term incentive compensation is in the form of performance shares, price-vested units, and time-vested awards. The payout of performance shares is based on the achievement of targets set by the Compensation Committee to the achievement of measurable milestone goals related to development. Price-vested units are tied to appreciation of stock price. Performance period for performance shares and price-vested units is three years. Time-vesting awards vest equally over three years.

Base Salaries

When establishing base salaries, the Compensation Committee takes into account each NEO’s performance of his role and responsibilities and, to the extent useful, the range of compensation of comparable executives in our peer group. The Compensation Committee believes that compensation objectives are effectively met when a majority of an executive’s compensation is composed of performance-based bonuses and long-term incentive compensation, rather than fixed compensation such as base salaries. We believe that having the overall compensation emphasis on long-term equity incentives instead of short-term fixed compensation better aligns management with shareholders.

The Compensation Committee approved the following 2019 and 2020 base salaries for our NEOs.

Name  

2019

Annual Base

Salary

   

2020

Annual Base

Salary

   

2020*

Actual

Salary

   

2019-2020 Base
Salary

Percent Increase

Gregory S. Bielli

  

$

675,000

 

  

$

700,000

 

  

$

653,333

 

  

3.7%

Allen E. Lyda

  

$

350,000

 

  

$

360,500

 

  

$

336,467

 

  

3.0%

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

265,000

 

  

$

272,950

 

  

$

254,753

 

  

3.0%

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

263,210

 

  

$

271,106

 

  

$

253,032

 

  

3.0%

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

269,216

 

  

$

277,292

 

  

$

258,806

 

  

3.0%

*

As part of our response to COVID-19 and the reduction of staffing costs the NEOs beginning May 2020 took a voluntary 10% decrease in salary for the remainder of 2020.

For 2020, the Compensation Committee after review of peer group data, relevant industry data, and input from our compensation consultant determined that Mr. Bielli’s base salary would be increased to stay competitive with current market expectations. When granting the salary increases for 2020 for the other NEOs, the Compensation Committee, along with the Chief Executive Officer, performed an annual review of each of the other NEOs’ salaries and evaluated changes to base salary. This review considered several factors, including peer group information, the market for similar job functions, the economic environment, changes in job responsibilities, and the general experience of the Compensation ConsultantCommittee members.

Annual Incentive Plan

Tejon’s practice is to award annual incentive bonuses based upon the achievement of performance objectives established at the beginning of each year.

The attainment of each year’s quantitative financial goals for each of the NEOs is uncertain and is dependent upon factors such as real estate sales and leasing programs, the timing of entitlement activities for our developments, and the uncertainty inherent in our farming and mineral operations due to the commodity nature of the products we produce and the fact that we do not know the production each year or the ultimate price we will receive for our products each year. The achievement of individual objectives tied to land entitlement, development, and conservation efforts is highly dependent on working with groups outside of the Company, such as government agencies, local county planning departments, and environmental resource groups, all of which make the timing of achieving specific steps in the process very complicated. Accordingly, goal achievement under the annual bonus plan is not guaranteed.

The following chart provides the performance level weightings for the Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs.

Weighted Measures  Gregory S.
Bielli
Chief
Executive
Officer
 Allen E.
Lyda
Chief
Operating
Officer
 Robert D.
Velasquez
SVP
Chief
Financial
Officer
 

Hugh F.
McMahon
EVP
Real

Estate

 Michael
R. W.
Houston
SVP
General
Counsel
  

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

Adjusted EBITDA

  40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

  

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

Kern LAFCO approval of TCWD Annexation 8 to be completed fourth quarter 2020

  

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

Fully lease new 580,000 square foot building third quarter of 2020

  

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

Approval by Real Estate Committee of new speculative building development fourth quarter 2020

  13.33% 13.33% 13.33% 13.33% 13.33%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

  

Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements

Individual Objectives

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Divisional Quantitative/Qualitative Weighting

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Weighting

  100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Generally, the Chief Executive Officer’s individual objectives are tied to land entitlement, public outreach in support of entitlement, and development and conservation goals as well as operational, strategic planning, and staffing objectives. The individual objectives for the other NEOs are generally related to land entitlement, development, and operational goals that support the achievement of corporate entitlement and development goals.

The annual incentive plan is structured, and bonus levels are determined based upon the level of achievement of threshold, target, and maximum performance of quantitative and qualitative objectives. If achievement of a performance objective is below threshold, no incentive bonus is earned for that objective, and if achievement is greater than maximum, the maximum bonus level is earned. The Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs have different cash incentive opportunity levels, which are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The target bonus levels expressed as percentage of base salary are in line with information provided by our independent compensation consultant.

The threshold, target, and maximum levels (expressed as a percentage of base salary) are outlined below.

   Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

  

 

62.50

 

 

125.00

 

 

187.50

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

 

45.00

 

 

90.00

 

 

135.00

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

 

25.00

 

 

50.00

 

 

75.00

Hugh F. McMahon, EVP, Real Estate

  

 

35.00

 

 

70.00

 

 

105.00

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

 

30.00

 

 

60.00

 

 

90.00

Quantitative Financial Goal – Corporate

We measure adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of our financial performance relative to budget and our ability to fund our real estate development activities. Our definition of adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, abandonment charges, and non-cash stock compensation. We believe adjusted EBITDA provides a good indicator of management’s creation of operating cash, which is critical to the funding of our entitlement and development efforts, since the Company has significant non-cash expenses each year. The following table outlines adjusted EBITDA results for 2020. Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes includes only company specific operations and not the add back of our share of unconsolidated joint venture depreciation, amortization, and interest expense. Therefore, this number is different from the numbers shown in the 2020 Annual Report and Form 10-K, Non-GAAP measures.

Quantitative Goal

 2019
Actual
  2020
Threshold
  2020
Target
  2020
Maximum
  2020
Actual
  % of
Target
 

Adjusted EBITDA *

 

$

23,158,000

 

 

$

8,318,000

 

 

$

11,090,000

 

 

$

16,635,000

 

 

$

8,630,000

 

 

 

77.82

%   

The adjusted EBITDA targets is set based on the Company’s 2020 business plan and operating budget. The Compensation Committee uses data from each year’s annual budget because it is a reflection of what the Company believes will happen in the coming year based on an analysis of the commodity markets we operate in, anticipated weather patterns that impact our agricultural operations, and sales/leasing activity within TRCC. Importantly, no adjustments were made to the 2020 target or results to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on Company performance.

The budgeted target goal for 2020 was less than the prior year actuals due largely to 2019 including several land contribution transactions and a land and building sale in one of the joint ventures the Company is a member in. When preparing the 2020 business plan and operating budget we did not expect to duplicate 2019 real estate transaction activity. The tables below reflect actual achievement shown in the format used by the Company internally to measure NEOs performance compared to the approved 2020 operating budget.

* Adjusted EBITDA Actual 2020 Calculation (non-GAAP):

 

Income before income tax

  

$

82,000

 

Interest, net

  

 

(884,000

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

4,938,000

 

Stock compensation expense

   4,494,000 
  

 

 

 

Total Adjusted EBITDA

  

$

8,630,000

 

  

 

 

 

Short-Term Milestone Objectives – Corporate

Annual short-term milestone corporate objectives are generally those items identified each year that are critical to successfully moving forward the Company’s long-term objectives related to land entitlement and development within our four development projects.

For 2020 the short-term objectives were as follows:

Work with the Tejon-Castac Water District, or TCWD, to achieve approval from the Kern County LAFCo (Local Agency Formation Commission) to annex land within Kern County and Los Angeles County to include the Centennial Development. The importance of this objective was to expand the service area of TCWD to include Centennial so that there will be uniformity of services within all four of our master planned developments as all will now be served by TCWD. This objective was completed during the fourth quarter of 2020, so target goal achievement was met.

Fully lease the new 580,000 square foot building completed in 2019 by the end of the third quarter of 2020. This goal is critical to our continued development of new buildings and monetizing our land asset with TRCC. Full lease up of the building was achieved during the second quarter of 2020. As a result, we were deemed to have met the goal at target achievement.

Receive approval from the Real Estate Committee of the Company for the speculative development of a new industrial building to be achieved by the fourth quarter of 2020. We did not receive final approval of the Real Estate Committee during the fourth quarter of 2020 but due to the level of progress made in the site design, engineering, building design, and permit approvals from Kern County, and an earlier preliminary approval from the Real Estate Committee that limited action to design, engineering, and permitting. The Compensation Committee determined that this objective was met at 75% of target achievement.

Individual Performance Objectives

In accordanceaddition to the goals described above, the CEO and each NEO also has individual performance objectives. The CEO’s individual performance objectives are proposed by the CEO and agreed upon and approved by the Compensation Committee. These objectives are tied to business development and organizational goals that move the Company forward in achieving its long-term objectives. Individual goals for our CEO in 2020 specifically related to:

leading and directing a ranch-wide strategy to facilitate future successful entitlement of our development projects, implementation of strategic business plans for master planned communities,

overseeing implementation of strategic business plans for master planned communities with its Charter,a focus on execution,

overseeing succession plans for key departments,

overseeing our corporate wide cost control program,

COVID-19 response.

Based on management’s proactive response to the COVID-19 pandemic, guidance in setting the stage for approval of the TRCC residential multi-family conditional use permit received January 2021, and continued reduction in controllable costs, the Compensation Committee hasdetermined that the sole authorityCEO’s individual performance was at the maximum achievement.

The other NEOs individual performance goals are generally tied to retainindividual areas of responsibility, which focus on both short-term and terminate independent consultants on matters of executive compensationlong-term goals (including improving operational efficiencies and benefits, including sole authority to approve the consultant’s feesachieving short-term milestones and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to obtain advice and assistance for internal and external legal, accounting, or other advisors. The Compensation Committee utilizes Semler Brossy as its compensation consultant. Semler Brossy reports directly to the Compensation Committee. Semler Brossy was not engaged to perform any additional services beyond its support of the Compensation Committee. In reviewing conflicts of interest, our Compensation Committee considered the following six factorsgoals with respect to Semler Brossy:the Company’s long-term business strategy related to land entitlement, development, and conservation). Generally, the qualitative goals covered:

 

•  The provisionCoordination and management of other services to the Company.

litigation strategies involving Mountain Village, Centennial, and Grapevine.

 

•  The amount of fees received fromGuiding the Company in working with various government agencies as a percentagepart of Semler Brossy’s total revenue.

the permitting process.

 

•  The policiesManagement of water resources and proceduresdevelopment of Semler Brossy that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest.

groundwater sustainability plans.

 

•  Any business or personal relationshipExpansion of Semler Brossy with a member of the Compensation Committee.

TRCC water facilities in preparation for future industrial and commercial retail absorption.

 

•  Any Company stock owned by Semler Brossy.

Meeting implementation dates related to farm developments.

 

•  Any business or personal relationshipAnalysis of Semler Brossyfuture staffing requirements to meet near-term and long-term needs as the Company moves forward with any of the Company’s executive officers.

its land entitlement and development plans.

Upon consideration of these factors, our

The CEO and the Compensation Committee concluded thatevaluate the engagementsuccess of Semler Brossy did not present any conflicts of interest and that Semler Brossy is independent.

In connectionthe other NEOs in meeting their individual performance objectives, with its engagementfinal approval provided by the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee Semler Brossy has:note whether each objective was accomplished in the time frame designated and if the outcome achieved was as specified in the original objective. The individual payouts as a percentage of target are shown in the table below.

2020 Performance Achievement

The following chart provides a breakdown of 2020 annual incentive award measurement by performance measurement category and the total 2020 incentive award as a percentage of salary. Final award measurement for the NEOs reflects actual results.

Weighted Measures  

Gregory S.

Bielli Chief

Executive

Officer

  

Allen E.

Lyda EVP Chief

Operating

Officer

  

Robert D.
Velasquez
SVP

Chief Financial
Officer

  

Hugh F.

McMahon

EVP

Commercial

  

Michael R.W
Houston

SVP
General
Counsel

 
   Corporate Quantitative Measurements 

Adjusted EBITDA

   40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00

Results as % of Target

   55.64  55.64  55.64  55.64  55.64
                     

Weighted Total (1)

   22.26  22.26  22.26  22.26  22.26
   Corporate Short-Term Objectives 

Blended Short-Term Objectives

   40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00  40.00

Results as % of Target

   91.68  91.68  91.68  91.68  91.68
                     

Weighted Total (1)

   36.67  36.37  36.67  36.67  36.67
   Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements: 
                     

Individual Objectives

   20.00  20.00  20.00  20.00  20.00

Results as % of Target (2)

   150.00  141.45  135.00  135.00  134.38
                     

Weighted Total (1)

   30.00  28.29  27.00  27.00  26.88
   Total 

Total Incentive Award as a Percentage of Target

   88.93  86.92  85.93  85.93  85.81
                     

Total Incentive Award as a Percentage of Salary

   111.15  78.23  42.96  60.15  51.48
                     

 

(1)

Weighted total is calculated as the performance objective times the performance achievement factor.

 

(2)

•  Provided information, insights,Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of overall individual performance and advice regarding compensation philosophy, objectives, and strategy.

•  Evaluated peer group selection criteria and identified and recommended potential peer companies.

•  Provided analysis of competitive compensation practices for NEOs.

•  Consulted withmanagement’s successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic the Compensation Committee on annual incentiverewarded the CEO with the maximum individual objective award and equity plan design.

•  Reviewed and commented on recommendations regarding CEO and NEO compensation.

•  Provided information on market trends related to executive compensation.

•  Advised the Compensation Committee on specific issues as they arose.

other NEO’s with a 35% increase in their individual objective results.

Compensation Risk Assessment

As part of its risk assessment process, the Compensation Committee reviewed material elements of executive andnon-executive employee compensation. The Compensation Committee concluded these policies

Equity Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that the long-term value of the Company will be driven by the execution of its long-term strategies. Accordingly, Tejon uses long-term equity incentives to align senior management’s interests with shareholders’ interests. The Compensation Committee believes that management should own stock and practices do not create risk that teamwork among the management group is reasonably likelyimportant in meeting business goals. Therefore, long-term milestone incentives are goal-based, with common performance measures for all participants to encourage teamwork.

Long-Term Equity
Compensation Vehicle
  Grant
Frequency
  

CEO

Weighting

  

Other
NEO’s

Weighting

  Vesting  Purpose
Performance Related Milestone Grants  Every three years  35%  55%  

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

 

  To tie equity compensation to longer-term real estate development milestones
Price Vesting Units  

Every three years – CEO

Annually – other NEOs

  15%  15%  

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

 

  To measure and tie equity compensation opportunity to stock price appreciation
Time-Vested Restricted Stock  

Every three years – CEO

Annually – other NEOs

 

  50%  30%  Three-year prorated vesting  To encourage share ownership and retention of executives

When granting shares whether the shares are performance or time vested, the Company’s practice is to determine annually a dollar amount of equity compensation to be provided, and to grant a number of performance shares and time vested shares that have a material adverse effectfair market value equal to that amount on the Company. The structuredate of our compensation program for NEOs does not incentivize unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. The base salary component of compensation does not encourage risk taking because it is a fixed amount. The incentive plan awards havegrant.

For the following risk limiting characteristics:

✓ Annual incentive awards for each NEO are limited to the fixed maximum specified in the incentive plan. Cash awards under the annual incentive plan are limited to 150% of the target cash award.

✓ Annual incentive awards are based on a review of a variety of performance factors, thus diversifying the risk associated with any single aspect of performance, while amounts received from performance stock awards are based on Company results rather than an individual executive officer’s performance.

✓ The variable compensation program places a greater weight on long-term pay opportunity as compared to short-term opportunity.

✓ The annual incentive plan allocates the highest weighting on overall corporate performance.

✓ Stock awards are not tied to formulas that could focus our NEOs on specific short-term outcomes.

✓ The Compensation Committee, which is composed of independent members of our Board, approves final incentive plan cash and stock awards in its discretion after reviewing executive and corporate performance.

✓ Awards are subject to our clawback policy.

✓ The majority of long-term value is delivered in shares of the Company with a multi-year vesting schedule, which aligns the interests of our NEOs to the long-term interests of shareholders.

✓ NEOs are subject to our executive stock ownership requirements.

2019 Executive Compensation Plan Framework

Our variable compensation consists of two programs: the annual incentive plan (“AIP”), which is an annual cash incentive program, and the2020-2022 long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”), which consistsmeasurement period the CEO’s equity awards are intended to cover three years of performance-based and time-basedgrants for each equity vehicles.award vehicle. The Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

Our AIP has four primaryAt the end of 2019, the Board of the Company, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the 2020-2022 performance measures:milestone measurement objectives that will be used to measure the vesting of performance milestone grants. The objectives are:

 

 1.

AchievementComplete a sale of targeted adjusted EBITDA, which reflects our annual operating budget.an asset or other capital generating or liquidity event that generates at least $100 million in proceeds (if a combination of sources, not more than 50% from debt sources) to the Company for use in TRCC, Mountain Village, Centennial or as the Board of Directors deems appropriate. The achievement of this goal is extremely important in moving to the execution phase of development for the projects just identified. At this time this goal has not been accomplished but efforts are ongoing to complete.

 

 2.

AchievementSuccessfully re-entitle the Grapevine project and complete California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, litigation stage within Superior Court by the end of total revenue2022. Goal achievement is essential to moving this project forward through the permitting and other income, which reflects our annual operating budget.mapping process and preparation for future development. Current status is on January 22, 2021 the Superior Court ruled in favor of the Company and Kern County on all issues and directed the Company and Kern County to prepare a final judgement reflecting its ruling in favor of the Company.

 

 3.

AchievementSuccessfully complete CEQA litigation stage within Superior Court for the Centennial project by the end of short-term corporate milestone goals, which are defined each year.

4.

Individual goals, which are defined each year.

Our LTIP consists of three equity delivery vehicles:

1.

Project-related milestone grants are awarded once every three years, most recently2022. Centennial is our development in 2017,Los Angeles County and are tied to specific business objectives related to our real estate development strategy. The Compensation Committee believes that accomplishing these goals are paramount to creating value in our land asset and achieving our long-term real estate development goals. The value of the milestone grants are three times that of an award that would normally be granted every year. The performance milestone focus issuccess with this litigation will

 on identifying development projects, protectingallow us to begin mapping and developing water assets, securing entitlement, permit, and mapping approvals, project implementation, and financing for our real estate holdings. These milestone performance grants have specific defined goals that are measurable and not subjective. This component of our LTIP delivers 40% of the long-term compensation opportunity over a3-year period. Performance milestone grantspermitting efforts for the three-year measurement perioddevelopment, which will move us closer to the beginning in 2017of development. Thus far this goal has not been accomplished but the court has held three hearings regarding this litigation on September 30, 2020, November 13, 2020, and are described in more detail below.January 8, 2021, but has not yet issued a ruling or judgment.

Shares associated with the above performance milestones were granted in March 2020 with a target vesting date of December 2022. These shares cliff vest at the end of three years based on performance and are either achieved or forfeited. There is no maximum or threshold level achievement. Exception is Milestone 1 above, which if achieved prior to December 31, 2021, target shares are adjusted up by 25%. If Milestone 1 is achieved between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 there is no adjustment to shares. The following table identifies the target value and target shares granted in 2020, representing three years’ worth of long-term incentive grants based on performance of milestones at target:

    

Target

Value

   

Target

Shares

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

$

2,170,000

 

  

 

153,574

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

$

892,238

 

  

 

63,145

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

450,368

 

  

 

31,873

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

670,987

 

  

 

47,487

 

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

457,532

 

  

 

32,380

 

During 2020, new price-vested units that are tied to stock price appreciation over the next three years were granted. For measurement purposes target achievement represents a 5% CAGR from the grant price and maximum payout is two times the grant price upon the measurement date at the end of 2022. Grant date price was $14.13 resulting in a target share price of $16.37. The price-vested units replace the performance grants tied to a cash flow metric.

Name  Target
Value
   Target
Shares
 

Gregory S. Bielli *

  

$

930,000

 

  

 

65,817

 

Allen E. Lyda,

  

$

81,113

 

  

 

5,740

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

40,943

 

  

 

2,898

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

60,999

 

  

 

4,317

 

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

41,594

 

  

 

2,944

 

 

2.*

Cash flow-related grants are awarded annuallyThe CEO’s grant represents three years’ worth of price-vested units and tiedthe Compensation Committee does not intend to specific operating cash flow goals, measured over overlapping three year periods. This component of our LTIP delivers 40% ofmake additional awards to the long-term compensation opportunity.CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

Annual performance shares granted prior to 2020 were tied to the achievement of a rolling three-year cash flow metric. This performance metric was selected by the Compensation Committee as a measurement of management’s ability to create operating cash over an extended period at a time when cash demands will be high and net income will not be significant. These grants vest at the end of a three-year performance period. The number of shares to be received is determined by the extent of performance achievement and can range from zero shares to the maximum award amount, which is 150% of the target award.

For the 2018-2020 period, the goal for cumulative cash from operations was $32,727,000. For the 2018-2020 period, goal achievement was 175.58% of the target objective, with actual cumulative cash from operations of $57,461,000 (without any adjustments to mitigate the impact of COVID-19). Maximum achievement is capped at 150% of target. These grants, which are referenced in footnote 2 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End table that begins on page 49, vested, and were delivered in early March 2021 after approval by the Compensation Committee.

Actual shares earned in respect of 2018-2020 three-year cash flow performance shares are as follows:

Name  Target
Shares
   Vested
Shares
   Value at Vesting-2021 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

  

 

22,153

 

  

 

33,230

 

  

$

555,606

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

 

8,640

 

  

 

12,960

 

  

$

216,691

 

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

 

4,491

 

  

 

6,737

 

  

$

112,643

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

  

 

6,793

 

  

 

10,190

 

  

$

170,377

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel*

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

$

-

 

 

3.*

Time-vested restricted stock units areMr. Houston forfeited shares when he left the final component of our LTIP. This element inCompany as the plan design recognizesvesting date was after the inherent risk in large-scale land development and helps balance the performance orientation of our approach with the objective of retaining our executive team. Further, time vested restricted stock units underscore an ownership orientation on the part of our executives. The grants vestone-third each year for three years. This component of our LTIP delivers 20% of the long-term compensation opportunity.date he left.

The table below summarizes the outstanding (as of the end of 2020) cash flow performance share measurement goals.

(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Grants

  Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual 

2018-2020 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

16,364

 

  

$

32,727

 

  

$

49,091

 

  $57,461 

2019-2021 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

14,985

 

  

$

29,970

 

  

$

44,955

 

   TBD 

During 2020, the Compensation Committee believesgranted time-vested restricted stock to the NEOs. This element is seen as a balance to the strong performance orientation of both the LTIP and the annual incentive program, with the objective of retaining our executive team.

Name  Grant Value   Grant Shares 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer *

  

$

3,100,000

 

  

 

219,391

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

$

162,225

 

  

 

11,481

 

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

$

81,885

 

  

 

5,795

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

  

$

121,998

 

  

 

8,634

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

$

83,188

 

  

 

5,887

 

*

As noted earlier,The CEO’s grant represents three years’ worth of time-vested restricted stock and the Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

The Role of the Compensation Committee in Setting Compensation

The Compensation Committee completes a review each year of our compensation plan to ensure we are paying competitively, equitably, and in a way that long-termencourages and rewards performance. Although the Compensation Committee reviews Peer Group data, relevant industry market data, and input from our compensation consultant as it determines compensation plans, other considerations are taken into account. Market data alone does not reflect the strategic value of various roles within our Company. Other considerations when making pay decisions for NEOs, include individual experience, sustained performance, award design reflectshistorical pay, and realized and realizable pay over three years.

The Compensation Committee of the value creation process inherent in large-scale land developmentBoard approves all compensation and awards to senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee independently reviews and establishes the compensation levels of the Chief Executive Officer; it also reviews the performance of the

Chief Executive Officer and discusses his performance with him. At the beginning of the year, the Chief Executive Officer works with the Compensation Committee to establish his goals and objectives to be evaluated throughout the year. For the remaining executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations as to compensation levels, including grants of equity awards, for final approval by first identifying projects, securing complex entitlements, managing litigation, mapping projects, and then developing the projects to maximize financial returns. Please refer to earlier graphic describing the land entitlement and development process within California.Compensation Committee.

Pay Mix Analysis

The target mix of total direct compensation elements for our CEO and NEOs, as a percentage of total compensation, is set forth in the tabletables below. The first set of exhibits illustrates the three-year direct compensation target selected by the Compensation Committee for the period 2017 – 2019. We show a three-year period to account for the granting of project milestone equity performance grants that occurs once every three years.years and occurred in 2020. A project milestone grant was most recently made in March 2017. For comparison purposes, the second set of exhibits shows the 2017 – 2019 actual direct compensation granted pay mix. The actual to target direct comparison shows that we are in line with the three-year target and that the CEO’s long-term equity portion has increased as asignificant percentage of his total direct compensation. This increase in the CEO’s long-term equityour compensation is consistentdelivered through variable cash and equity, with the intentover 50% of the Compensation Committee to have a greater percentage of pay tied toour CEOs target compensation provided through equity performance milestones.incentives.

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Named Executive Officer—Target Mix 2017 – 2019

  Base
Salary
   Annual
Incentives
   Long-Term
Equity
 

CEO3-Year Target (1)

  

 

25%

 

  

 

25%

 

  

 

50%

 

Other NEOs3-Year Target (1)

  

 

33%

 

  

 

22%

 

  

 

45%

 

In comparison to the above three-year target pay mix the actual granted pay mix for 2017-2019 is shown in the chart and table below:

LOGO

Named Executive Officer—Actual Granted Pay Mix 2017-2019

  Base
Salary
   Annual
Incentives
   (2)
Long-Term
Equity
 

CEO3-Year Target

  

 

21%

 

  

 

23%

 

  

 

56%

 

Other NEOs3-Year Target

  

 

33%

 

  

 

23%

 

  

 

44%

 

Named Executive Officer—Target Mix

  Base
Salary
   
AIP
   LTIP 

CEO 3-Year Target (1)

  

 

19%

 

  

 

24%

 

  

 

57%

 

Other NEOs 3-Year Target (1)

  

 

34%

 

  

 

23%

 

  

 

43%

 

 

1.

TheNew three-year measurement period covers 2017 – 2019. LTIP milestone equity grants were made in 2017.

2.

Includes LTIP milestone equity grants that are made once every three years and are tied to specific milestones that lead to the achievement of development objectives. For this three-year period, the grants were made in 2017.is based on 2020 target compensation.

Realized vs. Summary Compensation Table2020 Say on Pay Vote

The Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) summarizes executive pay but does not account for the final payout of performance shares, if any, or the impact of changes to stock price on the value of restricted stock. Since the majority of awards under the Company’s LTIP do not fully vest until after three years, it can be difficult to assess the link between pay and performance by reviewing the SCT alone. For this reason, we also consider realized pay. Realized pay demonstrates theactual impact on executive pay of changes inAt our share price during the performance period, as well as the payout of performance shares. Shares of restricted stock that vest during the applicable time period are valued at the date of vesting, and performance shares, if any, are valued at the date of payout.

Realized vs. Summary Compensation Table Pay for the CEO: 2017 through 2019

The graph below illustrates three-year average SCT (“SCT Pay”) total compensation compared to three-year average realized total compensation2020 Annual Meeting, our shareholders expressed support for our CEO for the 2017-2019 period. The graph illustrates no differences between the comparisons for salary, cash incentives, or other annual compensation. However, the difference between long-termexecutive compensation values for the CEO is minimal, due to a 2016 supplemental performance grant vesting at the endprogram, with 78.8% of 2019. This supplemental performance grant is not includedshareholders casting votes in the 2017-2019 summary compensation table pay. Excluding the 2016 supplemental performance grant vesting, the 2017-2019 realized pay would be 15% below the comparable 2017-2019 summary compensation table pay. This difference reflects the decrease in stock value realized over the period and the design of our compensation programs that emphasize long-term awards.

LOGO

Realized vs. Summary Compensation Table Pay for NEOs (other than the CEO): 2017 through 2019

Average NEO realized compensation over the three-year period ended December 31, 2019 was lower than SCT Pay over the same period. The amount realized from the vesting of shares is considerably less than the value of equity grants reported in the SCT.

LOGO

Market Comparison Review—2019 Peer Group

Although the Compensation Committee does not believe that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels based solely on market comparisons or industry practices, the Committee believes that information regarding pay practices at other companies is useful in three respects. First, marketplace information is onefavor of the many factors that the Compensation Committee considers in assessing the reasonableness of compensation. Second, it recognizes thatadvisory vote proposal. No changes were made to our executive compensation practices must be generally competitive for executive talent in the real estate, land development, and agriculture industries and the market overall. Third, it recognizes that marketplace information reflects emerging and changing components and forms of compensation. While the Compensation Committee considers peer compensation levels and practices when making its compensation decisions, it does not target compensation at any particular point withinprogram as a range established by a comparisonresult of the financial performance or compensation levels of our peer companies.advisory vote.

The skill, knowledge, and experience required of our senior management in the early period of large scale residential andmixed-use real estate communities is significant. Only with highly talented executives managing early stage development, will our assets realize their potential and our shareholders realize the desired return on their investment. In order to recruit and retain the executives we need in order to successfully manage and monetize our assets, we compare compensation to companies with greater current revenues when compared to our Company.

Each year, the Compensation Committee, with guidance from our independent compensation consultant, reviews companies for inclusion in our peer group. The goal is to identify companies that are engaged in real estate development activities and are appropriate for comparison purposes based on business activities, revenues and market capitalization.

At this time, the Compensation Committee believes that market capitalization is a more appropriate criterion for comparison to peer companies, considering that our primary assets remain under development and are not yet

producing their full revenue potential. Generally, our peer companies have monetized the majority of their real estate assets and, therefore, have higher revenues and market capitalization, by comparison to our Company.

The 2019 peer group data is shown below. The related comparison statistics are based on 2018 and 2019 financial data which was relied on by the Compensation Committee in approving the 2019 peer group.

Agree Realty

Forestar Group

Alexander & Baldwin

Kite Realty Group

Alico

Limoneira

BRT Realty Trust

One Liberty Properties

Consolidated-Tomoka Land

Retail Opportunity Investments

Cousins Properties

Saul Centers

First Industrial Trust

St. Joe Co.

Five Point Holdings

Stratus Properties

Peer Company Data Comparison

(Dollars in Millions)

Peer

Median (1)

Tejon (2)

  Tejon Percent  

Rank

Total Revenues

$

159

$

66

  6%

Market Capitalization

$

1,090

$

416

31%

Net Income

$

33

$

11

30%

(1)

Peer company data as of December 31, 2018; September 30, 2019; and October 31, 2019.

(2)

Tejon company data as of December 31, 2019.

Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee seeks to create a compensation plan that is balanced in its use of short-term and long-term compensation elements in order to align management’s incentives with the long-term interests of our shareholders and the development of our land assets. In developing the compensation plan, the Compensation Committee seeks to be aware of changing economic and industry conditions, as well as changing compensation trends. To achieve these objectives, the plan uses a variety of compensation elements as described below.

 

 

   Compensation Component

 

  

 

Objective

  

 

Characteristics

 

   

 

  Base Salary

  

 

Provide a fundamental level of compensation to the NEOs for performing their roles and assuming their levels of responsibility.

 

  

Fixed cash component annually reviewed and adjusted from time to time based on individual performance and peer group analysis.

 

  
  

 

  Annual Incentive Bonus

  

 

Drive the achievement of performance goals in a particular fiscal year.

  

 

Annual incentive bonuses are paid in cash. This performance basedperformance-based bonus opportunity is based on the achievement of quantitative and qualitative goals. Performance period is one year.

 

  
  

 

  Long-Term

  Incentive Compensation

  

 

Promote the achievement of our long-term financial goals and development milestone goals to create value by aligning NEO and shareholder interests, promoting NEO retention, and rewarding NEOs for performance over time.

  

 

Long-term incentive compensation is in the form of performance shares, price-vested units, and time-vested awards. The payout of performance shares is based on the achievement of targets set by the Compensation Committee related to cash flow management and the achievement of measurable milestone goals related to development. Price-vested units are tied to appreciation of stock price. Performance period for performance shares and price-vested units is three years. Time-vesting awards vest ratablyequally over three years.

 

  

Base Salaries

When establishing base salaries, the Compensation Committee takes into account each NEO’s performance of his role and responsibilities and, to the extent useful, the range of compensation of comparable executives in our peer group. The Compensation Committee believes that compensation objectives are effectively met when a majority of an executive’s compensation is composed of performance-based bonuses and long-term incentive compensation, rather than fixed compensation such as base salaries. We believe that having the overall compensation emphasis on long-term equity incentives instead of short-term fixed compensation better aligns management with shareholders.

The Compensation Committee approved the following 20182019 and 20192020 base salaries for our NEOs.

 

Name

2018

Salary

2019

Salary

Percent Increase  

2019

Annual Base

Salary

   

2020

Annual Base

Salary

   

2020*

Actual

Salary

   

2019-2020 Base
Salary

Percent Increase

Gregory S. Bielli

$

625,000

$

675,000

 

8.0

%

  

$

675,000

 

  

$

700,000

 

  

$

653,333

 

  

3.7%

Allen E. Lyda

$

325,000

$

350,000

 

7.7

%

  

$

350,000

 

  

$

360,500

 

  

$

336,467

 

  

3.0%

Robert D. Velasquez

$

253,380

$

265,000

 

4.6

%

  

$

265,000

 

  

$

272,950

 

  

$

254,753

 

  

3.0%

Hugh F. McMahon

$

255,544

$

263,210

 

3.0

%

  

$

263,210

 

  

$

271,106

 

  

$

253,032

 

  

3.0%

Michael R.W. Houston

$

261,375

$

269,216

 

3.0

%

  

$

269,216

 

  

$

277,292

 

  

$

258,806

 

  

3.0%

*

As part of our response to COVID-19 and the reduction of staffing costs the NEOs beginning May 2020 took a voluntary 10% decrease in salary for the remainder of 2020.

For 2019,2020, the Compensation Committee after review of peer group data, currentrelevant industry expectations,data, and input from our compensation consultant determined that Mr. Bielli’s base salary would be increased to stay competitive with current marked expectations recognizing no adjustments were made in 2018.market expectations. When granting the salary increases for 20192020 for the other NEOs, the Compensation Committee, along with the Chief Executive Officer, performed an annual review of each of the other NEOs’ salaries and evaluated changes to base salary. This review considered several factors, including peer group information, the market for similar job functions, the economic environment, changes in job responsibilities, and the general experience of the Compensation Committee members. Mr. Lyda’s increase in 2019 was tied to his promotion to Chief Operating Officer.

In December 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that for 2020, our Chief Executive Officer’s salary would increase to $700,000 and the base salaries of the other NEOs would be increased by 3%. In determining the 2020 salary levels, the Compensation Committee evaluated overall Company performance, peer group information, base salary compensation in relation to total compensation, individual performance, and information from our compensation consultant.

Annual Incentive Plan

Tejon’s practice is to award annual incentive bonuses based upon the achievement of performance objectives established at the beginning of each year. Annual incentive bonuses are paid in cash.

The attainment of each year’s quantitative financial goals for each of the NEOs is uncertain and is dependent upon factors such as real estate sales and leasing programs, the timing of entitlement activities for our developments, and the uncertainty inherent in our farming and mineral operations due to the commodity nature of the products we produce and the fact that we do not know the production each year or the ultimate price we will receive for our products each year. The achievement of individual objectives tied to land entitlement, development, and conservation efforts is highly dependent on working with groups outside of the Company, such as government agencies, local county planning departments, and environmental resource groups, all of which make the timing of achieving specific steps in the process very complicated. Accordingly, goal achievement under the annual bonus plan is not guaranteed.

The following chart provides the performance level weightings for the Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs.

 

Weighted Measures  Gregory S.
Bielli -
Chief
Executive
Officer
 Allen E.
Lyda -
Chief
Operating
Officer*
 

Robert D.
Velasquez -
SVP

Chief
Financial
Officer *

 

Hugh F.
McMahon -
EVP
Real

Estate

 Michael
R. W.
Houston
SVP
General
Counsel
  

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

Adjusted EBITDA

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

Adjusted Total Company Revenue

  10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

  

50%

 

50%

 

50%

 

50%

 

50%

  

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

Development of 580,000 sq. ft. spec building and 5,000 sq. ft. multi-tenant building by 4Q 2019 on budget

  

12%

 

12%

 

12%

 

12%

 

12%

Development of Mountain Village capital funding program

  

12%

 

12%

 

12%

 

12%

 

12%

Letter of Interest from a qualified replacement easement holder for conservation easements

  6% 6% 6% 6% 6%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

  

30%

 

30%

 

30%

 

30%

 

30%

  

Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements

Individual Objectives

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Divisional Quantitative/Qualitative Weighting

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Weighting

  100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Mr. Lyda was appointed to serve as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer on January 4, 2019. Mr. Velasquez was appointed to serve as Chief Financial Officer January 4, 2019.

Weighted Measures  Gregory S.
Bielli
Chief
Executive
Officer
 Allen E.
Lyda
Chief
Operating
Officer
 Robert D.
Velasquez
SVP
Chief
Financial
Officer
 

Hugh F.
McMahon
EVP
Real

Estate

 Michael
R. W.
Houston
SVP
General
Counsel
  

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

Adjusted EBITDA

  40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Quantitative Measurements

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

  

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

Kern LAFCO approval of TCWD Annexation 8 to be completed fourth quarter 2020

  

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

 

13.34%

Fully lease new 580,000 square foot building third quarter of 2020

  

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

 

13.33%

Approval by Real Estate Committee of new speculative building development fourth quarter 2020

  13.33% 13.33% 13.33% 13.33% 13.33%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Short-Term Objectives

  

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

 

40%

  

Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements

Individual Objectives

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Divisional Quantitative/Qualitative Weighting

  20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Weighting

  100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Generally, the Chief Executive Officer’s individual objectives are tied to land entitlement, public outreach in support of entitlement, and development and conservation goals as well as operational, strategic planning, and staffing objectives. The individual objectives for the other NEOs are generally related to land entitlement, development, and operational goals that support the achievement of corporate entitlement and development goals.

The annual incentive plan is structured, and bonus levels are determined based upon the level of achievement of threshold, target, and maximum performance of quantitative and qualitative objectives. If achievement of a performance objective is below threshold, no incentive bonus is earned for that objective, and if achievement is greater than maximum, the maximum bonus level is earned. The Chief Executive Officer and the other NEOs have different cash incentive opportunity levels, (expressedwhich are expressed as a percentage of base salary) for achievement at the threshold, target, and maximum levels.salary. The target bonus levels expressed as percentage of base salary are in line with information provided by our independent compensation consultant.

The threshold, target, and maximum levels (expressed as a percentage of base salary) are outlined below.

 

  Threshold Target Maximum   Threshold Target Maximum 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

  

 

50.00

 

 

100.00

 

 

150.00

  

 

62.50

 

 

125.00

 

 

187.50

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer/Former Chief Financial Officer

  

 

45.00

 

 

90.00

 

 

135.00

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

 

45.00

 

 

90.00

 

 

135.00

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

 

25.00

 

 

50.00

 

 

75.00

  

 

25.00

 

 

50.00

 

 

75.00

Hugh F. McMahon, EVP, Real Estate

  

 

35.00

 

 

70.00

 

 

105.00

  

 

35.00

 

 

70.00

 

 

105.00

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

 

30.00

 

 

60.00

 

 

90.00

  

 

30.00

 

 

60.00

 

 

90.00

Quantitative Financial Goal – Corporate

The achievementWe measure adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of entitlementsour financial performance relative to budget and the beginning of development forour ability to fund our real estate projects is a very important long-term goal, and because Tejon does not generate significant revenue at this time, its short-term objectives, both quantitative and qualitative, are tied to metrics that are critical for the accomplishment of long-term goals. For our annual incentive, two corporate budgeted financial goals are considered: adjusted EBITDA and Total Revenue and Other Income. Total Revenue and Other Income includes revenue from operations, gross sales of investment property, investment income, other income, and equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures.development activities. Our definition of adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, abandonment charges, andnon-cash stock compensation. We believe this is a more accurate measurement of the cash used in the operations of the Company. We believe adjusted EBITDA provides a bettergood indicator of management’s creation of operating cash, which is critical to the funding of our entitlement and development efforts, since the Company has significantnon-cash expenses each year. The following table outlines adjusted EBITDA and Total Revenue and Other Income results for 2019.2020. Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes includes only company specific operations and not the add back of our share of unconsolidated joint venture depreciation, amortization, and interest expense. Therefore, this number is different from the numbers shown in the 20192020 Annual Report and Form10-K,Non-GAAP measures.

 

Corporate Quantitative Goal

 2018
Actual
  2019
Threshold
  2019
Target
  2019
Maximum
  2019
Actual
  % of
Target (1)
 

Adjusted EBITDA *

 

$

12,883,000

 

 

$

7,910,000

 

 

$

10,547,000

 

 

$

15,821,000

 

 

$

23,158,000

 

 

 

219.57

Total Revenue and Other Income**

 

$

50,797,000

 

 

$

38,741,000

 

 

$

51,655,000

 

 

$

77,483,000

 

 

$

67,337,000

 

 

 

130.36

(1)

Maximum payment is capped at 150% of target.

Quantitative Goal

 2019
Actual
  2020
Threshold
  2020
Target
  2020
Maximum
  2020
Actual
  % of
Target
 

Adjusted EBITDA *

 

$

23,158,000

 

 

$

8,318,000

 

 

$

11,090,000

 

 

$

16,635,000

 

 

$

8,630,000

 

 

 

77.82

%   

The incentiveadjusted EBITDA targets areis set based on the Company’s 20192020 business plan and operating budget. The Compensation Committee uses data from each year’s annual budget because it is a reflection of what the Company believes will happen in the coming year based on an analysis of the commodity markets we operate in, anticipated weather patterns that impact our agricultural operations, and sales/leasing activity within TRCC. Our operating budgets we believe are a better predictor of each year’s revenue creation compared to prior year actual numbers, because our forecasting process attempts to pick up annual anticipated production within our crops, primarily pistachios, and trends in the commodity markets we operate in that may not be reflected in the prior year actual numbers.

Using prior year numbers as a target level for comparisonImportantly, no adjustments were made to the next year can unfairly benefit2020 target or hurt plan participants dueresults to mitigate the natureimpact of commodity markets. COVID-19 on Company performance.

The budgeted target goal for 2019 is2020 was less than the prior year actuals due largely to 2019 including several land contribution transactions and a land and building sale in one of the anticipation ofjoint ventures the Company is a decline in pistachio production duemember in. When preparing the 2020 business plan and operating budget we did not expect to the alternate year production cycle being lower and reduced estimates for the sale of water. Theduplicate 2019 actual results are greater than target goal numbers and prior year numbers due to the favorable variances described earlier under 2019 Operational and Financial Results on page 31.real estate transaction activity. The tables below reflect actual achievement shown in the format used by the Company internally to measure NEOs performance compared to the approved 20192020 operating budget.

 

* Adjusted EBITDA Actual 2019 Calculation(non-GAAP):

 

Income before income tax benefit

  

$

14,559,000

 

Interest, net

  

 

(1,239,000

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

5,036,000

 

Stock compensation expense

  

 

3,198,000

 

Abandonment Charges

   1,604,000 
  

 

 

 

Total Adjusted EBITDA

  

$

23,158,000

 

  

 

 

 

** Total Revenue and Other Income:

 

Real Estate Commercial /Industrial (includes equity in earnings of joint ventures)

  

$

33,367,000

 

Mineral Resources

  

 

9,791,000

 

Farming

  

 

19,331,000

 

Ranch Operations

  

 

3,609,000

 

Investment Income

  

 

1,239,000

 

  

 

 

 

Total Revenue and Other Income

  

$

67,337,000

 

  

 

 

 
* Adjusted EBITDA Actual 2020 Calculation (non-GAAP):

 

Income before income tax

  

$

82,000

 

Interest, net

  

 

(884,000

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

4,938,000

 

Stock compensation expense

   4,494,000 
  

 

 

 

Total Adjusted EBITDA

  

$

8,630,000

 

  

 

 

 

Short-Term Milestone Objectives – Corporate

Annual short-term milestone corporate objectives are generally those items identified each year that are critical to successfully moving forward the Company’s long-term objectives related to land entitlement and development within our four development projects.

For 20192020 the short-term objectives were as follows:

 

DevelopmentWork with the Tejon-Castac Water District, or TCWD, to achieve approval from the Kern County LAFCo (Local Agency Formation Commission) to annex land within Kern County and Los Angeles County to include the Centennial Development. The importance of athis objective was to expand the service area of TCWD to include Centennial so that there will be uniformity of services within all four of our master planned developments as all will now be served by TCWD. This objective was completed during the fourth quarter of 2020, so target goal achievement was met.

Fully lease the new 580,000 square foot building completed in 2019 by the end of the third quarter of 2020. This goal is critical to our continued development of new buildings and monetizing our land asset with TRCC. Full lease up of the building was achieved during the second quarter of 2020. As a result, we were deemed to have met the goal at target achievement.

Receive approval from the Real Estate Committee of the Company for the speculative development of a new industrial building and a 5,000 square foot retail multi-tenant buildingto be achieved by the fourth quarter and thirdof 2020. We did not receive final approval of the Real Estate Committee during the fourth quarter of 2019, respectively and on budget. The importance of this goal is to continue our positive momentum forward within TRCC by providing available product2020 but due to the marketplace.level of progress made in the site design, engineering, building design, and permit approvals from Kern County, and an earlier preliminary approval from the Real Estate Committee that limited action to design, engineering, and permitting. The industrial building is 67% leased and the multi-tenant building was contributed to our TA/Petro joint venture, which will operate four food and beverage offerings within the building. ThisCompensation Committee determined that this objective was met at the maximum level75% of target achievement.

Development of Mountain Village capital funding structure and program to move project forward toward development in the future. Management is continuing to gather information regarding possible development and financing structures to bring to the Board for further approval. This goal has not been completed.

Solicit a letter of interest from a qualified replacement easement holder for Conservation Easements related to the Ranch Wide Conservation Agreement. This is important to the Company due to the long-term working relationship that will be created with the easement holder. This was achieved at the threshold level of achievement.

Individual Performance Objectives

In addition to the goals described above, the Chief Executive Officer’s annual incentive bonus in 2019 was based upon the achievement ofCEO and each NEO also has individual performance objectives. The CEO’s individual performance objectives are proposed by the Chief Executive OfficerCEO and agreed upon and approved by the Compensation Committee. These objectives are tied to business development and organizational goals that move the Company forward in achieving its long-term objectives, including the achievement of strategic milestones related to land development and entitlement efforts that the Compensation Committee and the Board believe to be critical to the achievement of the Company’s long-term business plan.objectives. Individual goals for 2019our CEO in 2020 specifically related to:

 

leading and directing a ranch-wide strategy to facilitate future successful entitlement of our development projects, implementation of strategic business plans for master planned communities,

 

overseeing an outreach strategy to build supportimplementation of strategic business plans for our entitlement programs in Los Angeles County and Kern County,master planned communities with a focus on execution,

 

overseeing succession plans for key departments,

 

overseeing our corporate wide cost control program.program,

COVID-19 response.

Based on management’s proactive response to theCOVID-19 pandemic, guidance in setting the stage for approval of the Centennial plan, reapproval of the Grapevine project,TRCC residential multi-family conditional use permit received January 2021, and continued reduction in controllable costs, excluding the cost of sales related to real estate and water sales and assessments which have fixed rates of increase, the Compensation Committee determined that the Chief Executive Officer’sCEO’s individual performance was at a level above target achievement but belowthe maximum achievement.

The other NEO’sNEOs individual performance goals are generally tied to individual areas of responsibility, which focus on both short-term and long-term goals (including improving operational efficiencies and achieving short-term milestones and other goals with respect to the Company’s long-term business strategy related to land entitlement, development, and conservation). Generally, the qualitative goals covered:

 

•  Coordination regardingand management of litigation entitlement and permitting activity, andpre-development milestones for ourstrategies involving Mountain Village, community, Centennial, community, and Grapevine community.Grapevine.

 

•  Guiding the Company in working with various government agencies as a part of the entitlementpermitting process.

 

•  Acquiring and managingManagement of water resources to include theand development of new water infrastructure.groundwater sustainability plans.

 

•  Joint venture agreementExpansion of TRCC water facilities in preparation for development of a new speculative building for lease within Tejon Ranch Commerce Center during 2018. New building to be constructed in 2019.

•  Water treatmentfuture industrial and water resource recovery facility permits for Mountain Village.commercial retail absorption.

 

•  Meeting implementation dates related to farm developments.

•  Complete renewal of Company’s revolvingline-of-credit and extension of term-loan.

 

•  Analysis of future staffing requirements to meet near-term and long-term needs as the Company moves forward with its land entitlement and development plans.

•  Coordination with key Resource Organizations and the Tejon Ranch Conservancy to allow for successful entitlement of our development projects.

The Chief Executive OfficerCEO and the Compensation Committee evaluate the success of the other NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer) in meeting their individual performance objectives, with final approval provided by the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee note whether each objective was accomplished in the time frame designated and if the outcome achieved was as specified in the original objective. The individual payouts as a percentage of target are shown in the table below.

20192020 Performance Achievement

The following chart provides a breakdown of 20192020 annual incentive award measurement by performance measurement category and the total 20192020 incentive award as a percentage of salary. Final award measurement for the NEOs reflects actual results. The award measurement percentage for each NEO is shown in the following table.

 

Weighted Measures  

Gregory S.

Bielli - Chief

Executive

Officer

 

Allen E.

Lyda - EVP-Chief

Operating

Officer

 

Robert D.
Velasquez -

SVP

Chief Financial
Officer

 

Hugh F.

McMahon -

EVP

Commercial

 

Michael R.W
Houston

SVP/
General
Counsel

   

Gregory S.

Bielli Chief

Executive

Officer

 

Allen E.

Lyda EVP Chief

Operating

Officer

 

Robert D.
Velasquez
SVP

Chief Financial
Officer

 

Hugh F.

McMahon

EVP

Commercial

 

Michael R.W
Houston

SVP
General
Counsel

 
   Corporate Quantitative Measurements    Corporate Quantitative Measurements 

Adjusted EBITDA

   40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00   40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00

Results as % of Target

   150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00
   

Weighted Total (1)

   60.00  60.00  60.00  60.00  60.00
      

Adjusted Total Company Revenue

   10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00

Results as % of Target

   130.36 130.36 130.36 130.36 130.36   55.64 55.64 55.64 55.64 55.64
      

Weighted Total (1)

   13.04  13.04  13.04  13.04  13.04   22.26  22.26  22.26  22.26  22.26
   Corporate Short-Term Objectives    Corporate Short-Term Objectives 

Blended Short-Term Objectives

   30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00   40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00

Results as % of Target

   70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00   91.68 91.68 91.68 91.68 91.68
      

Weighted Total (1)

   21.00  21.00  21.00  21.00  21.00   36.67  36.37  36.67  36.67  36.67
   Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements:    Divisional Quantitative / Qualitative Measurements: 
      

Individual Objectives

   20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00   20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

Results as % of Target

   123.76 96.25 102.50 103.33 99.40

Results as % of Target (2)

   150.00 141.45 135.00 135.00 134.38
      

Weighted Total (1)

   24.75  19.25  20.50  20.67  19.88   30.00  28.29  27.00  27.00  26.88
   Total    Total 

Total Incentive Award as a Percentage of Target

   118.79  113.29  114.54  114.71  113.92   88.93  86.92  85.93  85.93  85.81
      

Total Incentive Award as a Percentage of Salary

   118.79  101.96  57.27  80.29  68.35   111.15  78.23  42.96  60.15  51.48
      

 

(1)

Weighted total is calculated as the performance objective times the performance achievement factor.

(2)

Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of overall individual performance and management’s successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic the Compensation Committee rewarded the CEO with the maximum individual objective award and the other NEO’s with a 35% increase in their individual objective results.

Equity Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that the long-term value of the Company will be driven by the execution of its long-term strategies. Accordingly, Tejon uses long-term equity incentives to align senior management’s interests with shareholders’ interests. The Compensation Committee believes that management should own stock and that teamwork among the management group is important in meeting business goals. Therefore, long-term milestone incentives are goal-based, with common performance measures for all participants to encourage teamwork.

 

Long-Term Equity
Long-Term Equity
Compensation Vehicle
  Grant
Frequency
  

CEO

Weighting

  

Other
NEO’s

Weighting

  Vesting  Purpose
Performance Related Milestone Grants  Every three years  35%  55%  

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

 

  To tie equity compensation to longer-term real estate development milestones
Price Vesting Units  

Every three years – CEO

Annually – other NEOs

  15%  15%  

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

 

  To measure and tie equity compensation opportunity to stock price appreciation
Time-Vested Restricted Stock  

Every three years – CEO

Annually – other NEOs

 

  50%  30%  Three-year prorated vesting  To encourage share ownership and retention of executives

When granting shares whether the shares are performance or time vested, the Company’s practice is to determine annually a dollar amount of equity compensation to be provided, and to grant a number of performance shares and time vested shares that have a fair market value equal to that amount on the date of grant.

For the 2020-2022 long-term incentive plan measurement period the CEO’s equity awards are intended to cover three years of grants for each equity award vehicle. The Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

Compensation Vehicle

Grant

Frequency

Target
Long-
Term
Vehicle

Weight

VestingPurpose
Performance Related Milestone GrantsEvery three years, most recent grant in 201740%

Cliff vesting at the end ofthe three-year period

To tie equity compensation to longer-term real estate development milestones
Three-Year Cash Flow Performance GrantsAnnually40%

Cliff vesting at the end of the three-year period

To measure and tie equity compensation opportunity to ongoing cash flow of our business, which is needed to fund our real estate development activities
Time-Vested Restricted StockAnnually20%

Three-year prorated vesting

To encourage share ownership and retention of executives

At the end of 2016,2019, the Board of the Company, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the 2017-20192020-2022 performance milestone measurement objectives that will be used to measure the vesting of performance milestone grants. The objectives are:

 

 1.

Provide assistance in obtaining approval of and/or beComplete a partsale of an approved ground water sustainability agencyasset or other capital generating or liquidity event that generates at least $100 million in proceeds (if a combination of sources, not more than 50% from debt sources) to the Company for use in TRCC, Mountain Village, Centennial or as the White Wolf Basin and the Castac Lake Basin. Grant date valueBoard of award equals 40% of total.Directors deems appropriate. The achievement of this goal is extremely important in moving to our abilitythe execution phase of development for the projects just identified. At this time this goal has not been accomplished but efforts are ongoing to work with local water districts in the management of groundwater on our lands. This objective was met at the maximum level of achievement.complete.

 

 2.

Create a destination retail development programSuccessfully re-entitle the Grapevine project and complete California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, litigation stage within Superior Court by the end of 2022. Goal achievement is essential to moving this project forward through the permitting and mapping process and preparation for future development. Current status is on land adjacent toJanuary 22, 2021 the Outlets of Tejon and begin construction of that program. Grant Date value of award equals 35% of total. This objective is important to our ongoing development of TRCC and the expansion of retail servicesSuperior Court ruled in order to expand our offerings and draw more consumers to our development. As a resultfavor of the macro changeCompany and Kern County on all issues and directed the Company and Kern County to prepare a final judgement reflecting its ruling in favor of the retail market we delayed moving forward with this project and the objective was not completed.Company.

 

 3.

Develop a programSuccessfully complete CEQA litigation stage within Superior Court for the Centennial project by the end of 2022. Centennial is our development of one of our residential master plans through a joint venture agreement, a letter of intentin Los Angeles County and success with a potential joint venture partner, or a program to develop the identified community ourselves. Grant date value of award equals 25% of total. This goal is key to the next step in the land development process as we move past entitlement and permitting and begin preparation to begin development activities. This goal has not been completed, buton-going work is continuing to push this objective forward.litigation will

allow us to begin mapping and permitting efforts for the development, which will move us closer to the beginning of development. Thus far this goal has not been accomplished but the court has held three hearings regarding this litigation on September 30, 2020, November 13, 2020, and January 8, 2021, but has not yet issued a ruling or judgment.

Shares associated with the above performance milestones were granted in March 20172020 with a target vesting date of December 2019. The values below represent three-years worth2022. These shares cliff vest at the end of long-term incentive opportunitythree years based on milestone performance. Maximum award achievementperformance and are either achieved or forfeited. There is 150% of target and occursno maximum or threshold level achievement. Exception is Milestone 1 above, which if performance objectives are achieved ten months prior to December 31, 2021, target date. Threshold award achievementshares are adjusted up by 25%. If Milestone 1 is 50% of targetachieved between January 1, 2022 and occurs if objectives are achievedDecember 31, 2022 there is no more than ten months after the target vesting date.adjustment to shares. The following table identifies the target value and target shares granted:granted in 2020, representing three years’ worth of long-term incentive grants based on performance of milestones at target:

 

  

Target

Value

   

Target

Shares

   

Target

Value

   

Target

Shares

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

$

1,500,002

 

  

 

65,076

 

  

$

2,170,000

 

  

 

153,574

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

$

556,658

 

  

 

24,150

 

  

$

892,238

 

  

 

63,145

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

296,630

 

  

 

12,869

 

  

$

450,368

 

  

 

31,873

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

446,570

 

  

 

19,374

 

  

$

670,987

 

  

 

47,487

 

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

305,989

 

  

 

13,275

 

  

$

457,532

 

  

 

32,380

 

The actual number of stockDuring 2020, new price-vested units that vestedare tied to stock price appreciation over the next three years were granted. For measurement purposes target achievement represents a 5% CAGR from the grant price and maximum payout is two times the grant price upon the measurement date at the end of 2022. Grant date price was $14.13 resulting in 2019 are identified ina target share price of $16.37. The price-vested units replace the footnotesperformance grants tied to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 FiscalYear-End table that begins on page 58. When granting three-yeara cash flow metric.

Name  Target
Value
   Target
Shares
 

Gregory S. Bielli *

  

$

930,000

 

  

 

65,817

 

Allen E. Lyda,

  

$

81,113

 

  

 

5,740

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

$

40,943

 

  

 

2,898

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

$

60,999

 

  

 

4,317

 

Michael R.W. Houston

  

$

41,594

 

  

 

2,944

 

*

The CEO’s grant represents three years’ worth of price-vested units and the Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

Annual performance shares performance milestone shares, or time grants the Company’s practice isgranted prior to determine annually a dollar amount of equity compensation to be provided for each type of grant, and to grant a number of shares that have a fair market value equal to that amount on the date of grant. Vesting of annual three-year cash flow performance share grants is2020 were tied to the achievement of budgeted cash provided from operations over 3 years. For 2019, the dollar amount attributed toa rolling three-year cash flow performance shares for the Chief Executive Officer was $540,000, and for the other NEOs it ranged from $106,000 to $210,000, depending on the importance of each NEO’s input to the successful achievement of the goal. The level of the target dollar amount for each NEO is based on a report from the POE Group (our prior compensation consultant) that recommended long-term compensation goals for each position. The shares granted are expensed based on the closing price of the stock on grant date.

metric. This rolling three-year cash flow performance metric was selected by the Compensation Committee as a measurement of management’s ability to create operating cash over an extended period at a time when cash demands will be high and net income will not be significant. For the 2019 grant, this cash flow measure covers the years 2019 through 2021 and has a cumulative cash from operations target of $29,970,000. The Company believes that achievement of this target level of performance will require significant effort and is dependent on the continued absorption of land at TRCC, improvement in oil and mineral revenues, maintenance of farm revenues at current levels, sales of water, and progress with respect topre-development activities at Mountain Village and entitlement activities at Centennial and Grapevine. Please refer to our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 for additional information regarding entitlement and development activities. This target assumes we are moving forward in a positive manner with respect to our development projects. These grants vest at the end of a three-year performance period. The number of shares to be received is determined by the extent of performance achievement and can range from zero shares to the maximum award amount, which is 150% of the target award.

For the 2017–20192018-2020 period, the goal for cumulative cash from operations was $28,251,000.$32,727,000. For the 2017–20192018-2020 period, goal achievement was 175.62%175.58% of the target objective, with actual cumulative cash from operations of $49,615,000.$57,461,000 (without any adjustments to mitigate the impact of COVID-19). Maximum achievement is capped at 150% of target. These grants, which are referenced in footnote 2 to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 20192020 FiscalYear-End table that begins on page 58,49, vested, and were delivered in early March 20202021 after approval by the Compensation Committee.

Actual shares earned in respect of 2017-20192018-2020 three-year cash flow performance shares are as follows:

 

Name  

2017-2019

Performance Grants Cash

from Operations

   

Value at Vest –

2020

   Target
Shares
   Vested
Shares
   Value at Vesting-2021 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

  

 

32,538

 

  

 

459,762

 

  

 

22,153

 

  

 

33,230

 

  

$

555,606

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer/Former Chief Financial Officer

  

 

12,075

 

  

 

170,620

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

 

8,640

 

  

 

12,960

 

  

$

216,691

 

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

 

6,435

 

  

 

90,927

 

  

 

4,491

 

  

 

6,737

 

  

$

112,643

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

  

 

9,687

 

  

 

136,877

 

  

 

6,793

 

  

 

10,190

 

  

$

170,377

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

 

6,638

 

  

 

93,795

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel*

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

$

-

 

See the 2019 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table on page 57 for the number of shares granted to each NEO for the 2019-2021 rolling three-year period.

*

Mr. Houston forfeited shares when he left the Company as the vesting date was after the date he left.

The table below summarizes the outstanding (as of the end of 2019)2020) cash flow performance share measurement goals.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Performance Grants

  Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual   Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual 

2017-2019 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

14,126

 

  

$

28,251

 

  

$

42,377

 

  $49,615 

2018-2020 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

16,364

 

  

$

32,727

 

  

$

49,091

 

   TBD   

$

16,364

 

  

$

32,727

 

  

$

49,091

 

  $57,461 

2019-2021 Cash Flow Objective - Cash from Operations

  

$

14,985

 

  

$

29,970

 

  

$

44,955

 

   TBD   

$

14,985

 

  

$

29,970

 

  

$

44,955

 

   TBD 

During 2019,2020, the Compensation Committee granted time-vested restricted stock to the NEOs. This element is seen as a balance to the strong performance orientation of both the LTIP and the annual incentive program, with the objective of retaining our executive team.

Name  Grant Value   Grant Shares 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer *

  

$

3,100,000

 

  

 

219,391

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer

  

$

162,225

 

  

 

11,481

 

Robert D. Velasquez, SVP, Chief Financial Officer

  

$

81,885

 

  

 

5,795

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

  

$

121,998

 

  

 

8,634

 

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

  

$

83,188

 

  

 

5,887

 

*

As noted earlier,The CEO’s grant represents three years’ worth of time-vested restricted stock and the Compensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

The dollarRole of the Compensation Committee in Setting Compensation

The Compensation Committee completes a review each year of our compensation plan to ensure we are paying competitively, equitably, and in a way that encourages and rewards performance. Although the Compensation Committee reviews Peer Group data, relevant industry market data, and input from our compensation consultant as it determines compensation plans, other considerations are taken into account. Market data alone does not reflect the strategic value attributedof various roles within our Company. Other considerations when making pay decisions for NEOs, include individual experience, sustained performance, historical pay, and realized and realizable pay over three years.

The Compensation Committee of the Board approves all compensation and awards to these shares isone-half the annual performance share grant. For 2019, the dollar amount forsenior management, including the Chief Executive Officer was $270,000, and for the other NEOs it ranged from $53,000 to $105,000.

In 2016,NEOs. The Compensation Committee independently reviews and establishes the Board of Directorscompensation levels of the Company, onChief Executive Officer; it also reviews the recommendationperformance of the Compensation Committee, approved and granted to the CEO aone-time supplemental long-term stock incentive compensation opportunity. Potential awards are based on the achievement of specific performance goals with measurement periods of two years and four years. This supplemental incentive opportunity was provided outside our standard compensation plans and therefore does not recur regularly. The purpose of the supplemental grant was to increase our CEO’s stock ownership opportunity, by achieving performance results, and encourage his retention with the Company.

There were two award opportunities in the grant; the first vested in 2017 and the second vested in 2019. Each opportunity had quantifiable performance metrics associated with our business plans and a TSR component.

The first opportunity, which vested and was settled in 2017, was tied to the growth of revenue at Tejon Ranch Commerce Center East. The performance incentive was paid out at maximum due to a 96.6% increase in revenue from the properties. The TSR component of this opportunity was not earned due to not meeting the TSR performance objective.

The second award opportunity allowed the CEO the opportunity to earn up to a maximum of 90,000 shares of stock if, by December 31, 2019, entitlement is in place, a preliminary tract map is developed and approved, and the business plan is approved by the Board for Grapevine at Tejon Ranch and Mountain Village at Tejon Ranch. This objective was achieved at the maximum level. Please see the Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2019 table on page 60, for value realized upon vesting. This second award opportunity also included a TSR component, which was not earned due to TSR for the measurement period being below the goal objective.

Chief Executive Officer and discusses his performance with him. At the beginning of the year, the Chief Executive Officer works with the Compensation Committee to establish his goals and objectives to be evaluated throughout the year. For the 2020-2022remaining executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations as to compensation levels, including grants of equity awards, for final approval by the Compensation Committee.

The Role of the Compensation Consultant

In accordance with its Charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate independent consultants on matters of executive compensation and benefits, including sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to obtain advice and assistance for internal and external legal, accounting, or other advisors. The Compensation Committee utilizes Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”) as its compensation consultant. Semler Brossy reports directly to the Compensation Committee. Semler Brossy was not engaged to perform any additional services beyond its support of the Compensation Committee. In reviewing conflicts of interest, our Compensation Committee considered the following six factors with respect to Semler Brossy:

•  The provision of other services to the Company.

•  The amount of fees received from the Company as a percentage of Semler Brossy’s total revenue.

•  The policies and procedures of Semler Brossy that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest.

•  Any business or personal relationship of Semler Brossy with a member of the Compensation Committee.

•  Any Company stock owned by Semler Brossy.

•  Any business or personal relationship of Semler Brossy with any of the Company’s executive officers.

Upon consideration of these factors, our Compensation Committee concluded that the engagement of Semler Brossy did not present any conflicts of interest and that Semler Brossy is independent.

In connection with its engagement by the Compensation Committee, Semler Brossy has:

•  Provided information, insights, and advice regarding compensation philosophy, objectives, and strategy.

•  Evaluated peer group selection criteria and identified and recommended potential peer companies.

•  Provided analysis of competitive compensation practices for NEOs.

•  Consulted with the Compensation Committee on annual incentive and equity plan design.

•  Reviewed and commented on recommendations regarding CEO and NEO compensation.

•  Advised the Compensation Committee on specific issues as they arose.

•  Provide information on market trends related to executive compensation.

Compensation Risk Assessment

As part of its risk assessment process, the Compensation Committee reviewed material elements of executive and non-executive employee compensation. The Compensation Committee concluded these policies and practices do not create risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The structure of our compensation program for NEOs does not incentivize unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. The base salary component of compensation does not encourage risk taking because it is a fixed amount. The incentive plan awards have the following risk limiting characteristics:

✓ Annual incentive awards for each NEO are limited to the fixed maximum specified in the incentive plan. Cash awards under the annual incentive plan are limited to 150% of the target cash award.

✓ Annual incentive awards are based on a review of a variety of performance factors, thus diversifying the risk associated with any single aspect of performance, while amounts received from performance stock awards are based on Company results rather than an individual executive officer’s performance.

✓ The variable compensation program places a greater weight on long-term pay opportunity as compared to short-term opportunity.

✓ The annual incentive plan allocates the highest weighting on overall corporate performance.

✓ Stock awards are not tied to formulas that could focus our NEOs on specific short-term outcomes.

✓ The Compensation Committee, which is composed of independent members of our Board, approves final incentive plan cash and stock awards in its discretion after reviewing executive and corporate performance.

✓ Awards are subject to our clawback policy.

✓ The majority of long-term value is delivered in shares of the Company with a multi-year vesting schedule, which aligns the interests of our NEOs to the long-term interests of shareholders.

✓ NEOs are subject to our executive stock ownership requirements.

Market Comparison Review—2020 Peer Group

The skill, knowledge, and experience required of our senior management in the early period of large scale residential and mixed-use real estate communities is significant. Only with highly talented executives managing early stage development, will our assets realize their potential and our shareholders realize the long-term equitydesired return on their investment. In order to recruit and retain the executives we need to successfully manage and monetize our assets, we compare compensation planto companies with greater current revenues when compared to our Company.

Although the Compensation Committee does not believe that it is being changedappropriate to incorporate three-year measurement periodestablish compensation levels based solely on market comparisons or industry practices, the Committee believes that information regarding pay practices at other companies is useful in three respects. First, marketplace information is one of the many factors that the Compensation Committee considers in assessing the reasonableness of compensation. Second, it recognizes that our compensation practices must be generally competitive for executive talent in the real estate, land development, and agriculture industries and the market overall. Third, it recognizes that marketplace information reflects emerging and changing components and forms of compensation. While the Compensation Committee considers peer compensation levels and practices when making its compensation decisions, it does not target compensation at any particular point within a range established by a comparison of the financial performance milestones grants, time-vested grants,or compensation levels of our peer companies.

Each year, the Compensation Committee, with guidance from our independent compensation consultant, reviews companies for inclusion in our peer group. The goal is to identify companies that are engaged in real estate development activities and price vesting grants tiedare appropriate for comparison purposes based on business activities, revenues, and market capitalization.

At this time, the Compensation Committee believes that market capitalization is a more appropriate criterion for comparison to stock price performance.peer companies, considering that our primary assets remain under development and are not yet producing their full revenue potential. Generally, our peer companies have monetized the majority of their real estate assets and, therefore, have higher revenues and market capitalization, by comparison to our Company.

The 2020 peer group data is shown below.

    Agree Realty

Forestar Group

    Alexander & Baldwin

Kite Realty Group

    Alico

Limoneira

    BRT Realty Trust

One Liberty Properties

    Consolidated-Tomoka Land

Retail Opportunity Investments

    Cousins Properties

Saul Centers

    First Industrial Trust

St. Joe Co.

    Five Point Holdings

Stratus Properties

Benefits and Perquisites

Retirement Plans

The Compensation Committee believes that retirement programs are important to the Company,Company’s talent retention, as they contribute to the Company’s ability to be competitive with its peers. For many of our employees, including the Chief Operating Officer, and one of our Executive Vice Presidents of Real Estate, Tejon provides a pension plan and a 401(k) plan. In addition, the Company provides the Chief Operating Officer a supplemental executive retirement plan, or SERP. Based on their hiring dates, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and our Senior Vice President and General Counsel are not included in the pension plan or SERP, which were frozen for entrance as of February 1, 2007, but are included in the 401(k) plan. During 2017, both the pension plan and SERP were frozen as to the accrual of future benefits.

The NEOs may elect to defer cash and equity-based compensation payable to them pursuant to the Company’s deferred compensation plan. This plan is designed to allow for retirement savings above the limits imposed by the IRS for 401(k) plans on an incometax-deferred basis. Cash amounts deferred into the plan are held in accounts with values indexed to the performance of selected mutual funds. Stock awards deferred into the plan can be converted to cash or kept in the Company’s stock. All participants to date have only deferred stock awards and have maintained stock in the plan. The Company does not provide a match on executive deferrals under the deferred compensation plan.

Change in Control Benefits

The Compensation Committee believes that shareholders’ interests will be best served if the interests of executive management are aligned with them, and that providing management with change in control benefits supports that objective by focusing executives on shareholder interests when considering strategic alternatives. Except for accelerated vesting of equity awards, available to all NEOs, pursuant to our equity compensation plan, change in control benefits, as provided in a severance agreement with selected NEOs, are only provided upon a termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason in connection with a change in

control. None of the agreements with our NEOs or other compensation plans, or arrangements provide for agross-up payment or reimbursement for excise taxes that could be imposed on the executives. Beginning in 2019, future equity awards will have accelerated vesting only upon a change in control and termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control. Please refer to the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control table on page 6253 of this Proxy Statement for a more detailed description and an estimate of value of these benefits.

In addition to the foregoing change in control severance benefits, the NEOs who participate in the pension plan and SERP will also continue to be entitled to benefits under any existing pension plan and SERP as determined in accordance with the terms of those plans.

Separation or Severance Benefits

In some circumstances, the Compensation Committee believes it is in the Company’s best interest to provide a severance benefit in order to provide a smooth transition period for the Company when an executive leaves, even if the Company does not have a contractual obligation to provide a separation package. Separation benefits in the form of salary continuation and health benefits may be provided to departing executives on acase-by-case basis. These benefits have historically endured for approximately one year. A more detailed description of separation benefits payable to our NEOs is included below under “Fiscal Year 20192020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 6253 of this Proxy Statement.

Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, if an NEO’s employment with the Company is terminated for any reason, including death or disability, prior to vesting of all or any part of a restricted stock award or performance unit award, the NEO will forfeit to the Company the portion of the award that has not vested.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

The Compensation Committee reviews annually the perquisites that NEOs receive. The primary benefits for the NEOs are Company vehicles and related maintenance. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer receives additional life insurance in excess of the insurance that is part of the Company’s broad-based life insurance policy. This additional insurance supplement is necessary to provide the same three-time salary benefit that other employees receive. These benefits are provided to attract and retain highly qualified executives, and because executives often place a higher value on these benefits relative to cost to the Company as compared to increases in cash compensation. In addition, the automobile benefit is provided to executives as well as other Company employees because the Company’s location and the size of the Company’s property necessitate extensive car travel.

Senior management also participates in the Company’s other benefit plans on the same terms as other employees. These plans include medical, dental, and life insurance.

Other Compensation Practices and Policies

Clawback Policy

The Company has a policy requiring a fixed course of action with respect to compensation adjustments following restatements of our financial statements. In the event that our Board determines there has been a restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Board will review all incentive payments that were made to executive officers and all performance-based equity awards granted to executive officers that were vested in each case, on the basis of having met or exceeded such performance targets in grants or awards made during the three full fiscal years prior to the filing of the Current Report on Form8-K announcing the restatement.

If such payments and/or vesting would have been lower had they been calculated based on such restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by governing law, seek to recoup for the benefit of the Company’s shareholders such payments to and/or equity awards held by executive officers who are found personally responsible for the material restatement, as determined by the Board, by requiring such executive officers to pay such amounts to the Company byset-off, by reducing future compensation, or by such other means or combination of means as the Board determines to be appropriate.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company’s stock retention guidelines are as follows:

 

Position

  Stock Multiple

Chief Executive Officer

  

5.0 x Base Salary

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

  

3.0 x Base Salary

Other NEOs

  

2.0 x Base Salary

All NEOs are expected to make reasonably steady progress toward these ownership guidelines each year Whileyear. As of the filing of the 2021 Proxy Statement the Chief Executive Officer had notand the Chief Operating Officer have met the guidelines as of the end of 2018 due to ouryear-endstock price, he is expected to meet the guidelines during 2020.ownership guidelines. The Executive Vice President of Real Estate has until

2020 to meet the guidelines, and the Senior Vice President General Counsel and the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer have through 2021 to reach their guidelines, based on their participation dates. The Chief Operating Officer has met the stock ownership guidelines. The Compensation Committee reviews such progress annually. Since these guidelines are not a contractual basis for remaining in the employment of the Company, the success or lack of success in meeting the guidelines will be evaluated by the Compensation Committee and reflected in each NEO’s annual review for that year.annually

Securities Trading Policy Including Derivatives Trading, Hedging,Policies and PledgingLimitations

The Company has a policy that prohibits executive officers and directors from trading in Company stock while in the possession of material nonpublic information. The Company also maintains a non-trading period connected to year-end and quarter-end financial reporting periods. Executive officers and directors are also prohibited from trading in options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to the Company’s stock. They are also prohibited from purchasing stock on margin, borrowing against the Company’s stock held in a margin account, or pledging stock as collateral for a loan.

The Company also maintains an Insider Trading Policy, under which directors, executive officers, and employees—and their designees—are prohibited from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities that were granted to the employee or director by the Company as compensation or that are held, directly or indirectly, by the employee or director.

Tax Considerations

For 2017 and prior years,Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, imposed a $1 million limit on the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers of public companies, unless the compensation meets certain requirements for “performance-based” compensation. Following adoption of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”), the exceptions from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation and for the chief financial officer’s compensation were eliminated effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, annual compensation paid to covered employees in excess of $1 million dollars will not be deductible (other than in the case of certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017). DueAlthough the Company continues to the complexitytie a majority of executive compensation to performance-based compensation elements, due to Section 162(m) and the grandfather rules thereunder, the Compensation Committee cannot be certain thatnot all compensation arrangements that were in place before such date that were intendedpaid to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)our executive officers will in fact be deductible.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Directors Betts, Leggio, Metcalfe, Stack, and Tisch served on the Compensation Committee during 2019.2020. No member of the Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of the Company, or has had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of RegulationS-K.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed that Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 20202021 Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprised the Compensation Committee for 2019.2020.

Steven A. Betts (Chairman),

Anthony L. Leggio,

Norman J. Metcalfe,

Geoffrey L. Stack,

Daniel R. Tisch

Fiscal Year 20192020 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of the NEOs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017.2018.

 

Name and Principal Position Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 (1)
Stock
Awards
($)
 (2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 (3)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 (4)
All
Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
 Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 (1)
Stock
Awards
($)
 (2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 (3)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 (4)
All
Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
 

Gregory S. Bielli

 2019 675,000  —   809,991 801,818  —   22,177 2,308,986 2020  653,333   —    6,200,000  778,066   —    17,853  7,649,252 

Chief Executive Officer

 2018 625,000  —   750,001 855,768  —   22,177 2,252,946 2019  675,000   —    809,991  801,818   —    22,177  2,308,986 
 2017 625,000  —   2,233,199 437,770  —   19,364 3,315,333 2018  625,000   —    750,001  855,768   —    22,177  2,252,946 

Allen E. Lyda*

 2019 350,000  —   315,003 356,854 338,155 10,295 1,370,307

Chief Operating Officer/

 2018 325,000  —   292,507 371,074  —   10,295 998,876

Former Chief Financial Officer

 2017 309,252  —   834,966 144,043 175,874 9,857 1,474,012

Allen E. Lyda

 2020  336,467   —    1,135,576  282,018  283,702  8,355  2,046,118 

Chief Operating Officer

 2019  350,000   —    315,003  356,854  338,155  10,295  1,370,307 
 2018  325,000   —    292,507  371,074   10,295  998,876 

Hugh F. McMahon

 2019 263,210  —   236,893 211,334 94,295 9,835 815,567 2020  253,032   —    853,984  163,057  82,711  11,539  1,364,323 

Executive Vice President, Real Estate

 2018 255,544  —   229,988 238,037  —   9,835 733,404 2019  263,210   —    236,893  211,334  94,295  9,835  815,576 
 2017 248,101  —   667,689 99,388 57,075 8,867 1,081,120 2018  255,544   —    229,988  238,037   9,835  733,404 

Robert D. Velasquez *

 2019 265,000  —   159,000 151,760  —   15,000 590,760

Robert D. Velasquez

 2020  254,753   —    573,196  117,262   —    13,993  959,204 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer

         2019  265,000   —    159,000  151,760   —    15,000  590,760 
        

Michael R.W. Houston

 2019 269,216  —   161,529 184,008  —   11,626 626,379

Michael R.W. Houston *

 2020  258,806   —    582,314  142,745   —    11,139  995,004 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

 2018 261,375  —   156,816 208,394  —   11,626 638,211 2019  269,216   —    161,529  184,008   —    11,626  626,379 
 2017 255,000  —   460,516 101,694  —   9,407 826,617 2018  261,375   —    156,816  208,394   —    11,626  638,211 

 

*

Mr. Lyda was appointed to serveHouston resigned from his position as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer onof January 4, 2019. For the entirety of 2018, Mr. Lyda served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Velasquez was appointed to serve as Chief Financial Officer on January 4, 2019.31, 2021.

1.

The figures in this column represent equity awards for the Chief Executive Officer and for the other NEOs as follows: (i) grant date fair value of time-based grants; and (ii) the grant date fair value of the three-year rollingprice-vested units; and (iii) performance shares granted in 2019.milestone grants. For the 2020-2022 long-term incentive plan measurement period the CEO’s equity awards are intended to cover three years of grants for each equity award vehicle. The following outlinesCompensation Committee does not intend to make additional awards to the 2019 stock grants:CEO during the 2020-2022 period.

 

  Time Based
Restricted
Stock Award
   Three-Year
Rolling
Performance
Shares
   Total Actual
Award
 
Update based on data provided  Time Based
Restricted
Stock Award
   

Price-
Vested

Units

   

Performance
Milestone

Grants

   Total Actual
Award
 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

 

$269,997

 

  

 

$539,994

 

  

 

$809,991

 

  

 

$3,100,000

 

  

 

$930,000

 

  

 

$2,170,000

 

  

 

$6,200,000

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

 

$105,001

 

  

 

$210,002

 

  

 

$315,003

 

  

 

$   162,225

 

  

 

$  81,113

 

  

 

$   892,238

 

  

 

$1,135,576

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

 

$  78,958

 

  

 

$157,935

 

  

 

$236,893

 

  

 

$   121,998

 

  

 

$  60,999

 

  

 

$   670,987

 

  

 

$   853,984

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

 

$  53,006

 

  

 

$105,994

 

  

 

$159,000

 

  

 

$     81,885

 

  

 

$  40,943

 

  

 

$   450,368

 

  

 

$   573,196

 

Michael R. W. Houston

  

 

$  53,837

 

  

 

$107,692

 

  

 

$161,529

 

  

 

$     83,188

 

  

 

$  41,594

 

  

 

$   457,532

 

  

 

$   582,314

 

The value of stock awards is the grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value for grants with performance conditions includes the estimated probable outcome of the performance condition. Further information regarding stock awards can be found in Note 11, Stock Compensation Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020. The stock awards granted did not vest during 20192020 and will only vest in future years based on the achievement of cash flow targets, milestones and/or continued employment with the Company.

At maximum achievement, the value received under the three-year rolling performance sharesprice-vested unit awards granted in 20192020 would be $810,000$2,790,000 for Mr. Bielli, $315,000$243,338 for Mr. Lyda, $237,000$182,997 for Mr. McMahon, $159,000$122,828 for Mr. Velasquez, and $162,000$0 for Mr. Houston.Houston, whose shares were forfeited when he left the Company.

2.

Non-equity incentive plan compensation is described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Annual Incentive Plan” beginning on page 43.33. Incentive bonuses are paid in cash.

3.

The change in pension value is based upon the same assumptions and measurements that are used for the audited financial statements for the applicable fiscal year. See Note 15, Retirement Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020. There are no above-market or preferential earnings related to the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

4.

Except with respect to Mr. Bielli, for whom “All Other Compensation” also includes $3,720 for life insurance premiums, each of the NEOs received the amounts set forth in this column in the form of a Company-provided vehicle and related maintenance.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 20192020

The following table provides information about awards granted to the NEOs in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.2020.

 

     

 

Estimated Future Payouts

UnderNon-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (2)

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock or
Units
(#)
 Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
Awards
($)
      

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (2)

  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock or
Units
(#)

 

Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock

Awards

($)

 
Name Year 

Grant

Date

 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
  Year 

Grant

Date

 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Gregory S. Bielli(3)

                                        

Annual Incentive Plan

 2019   337,500  675,000  1,012,500       2020   437,500  875,000  1,312,500      

Time Vested Stock Grant

  3/12/19        14,950  269,997 

Performance Grants, Cash Flow Objective

   

 

3/12/19

 

 

 

     

 

14,950

 

 

 

  

 

29,900

 

 

 

  

 

44,850

 

 

 

   

 

539,994

 

 

 

Allen E. Lyda

          

Time-Vested Stock Grant

  3/12/20        219,391  3,100,000 

Performance Milestone Grants

  3/12/20     0  153,574  172,771   2,170,000 

Price-Vested Unites

  3/12/20     0  65,817  197,452   930,000 

Total

           

 

6,200,000

 

 

 

Allen E. Lyda (3)

          

Annual Incentive Plan

 2019   157,500  315,000  472,500       2020   162,225  324,450  486,675      

Time-Vested Stock Grant

  3/12/19        5,814  105,001   3/12/20        11,481  162,225 

Performance Grants, Cash Flow Objective

   

 

3/12/19

 

 

 

     

 

5,814

 

 

 

  

 

11,628

 

 

 

  

 

17,442

 

 

 

   

 

210,002

 

 

 

Hugh F. McMahon

          

Performance Milestone Grants

  3/12/20     0  63,145  68,418   892,238 

Price-Vested Unites

  3/12/20     0  5,740  17,221   81,113 

Total

           

 

1,135,576

 

 

 

Hugh F. McMahon (3)

          

Annual Incentive Plan

 2019   92,124  184,247  276,371       2020   94,887  189,774  284,661      

Time-Vested Stock Grant

  3/12/19        4,372  78,958   3/12/20        8,634  121,998 

Performance Grants, Cash Flow Objective

   

 

3/12/19

 

 

 

     

 

4,373

 

 

 

  

 

8,745

 

 

 

  

 

13,118

 

 

 

   

 

157,935

 

 

 

Robert D. Velasquez

          

Performance Milestone Grants

  3/12/20     0  47,487  51,452   670,987 

Price-Vested Units

  3/12/20     0  4,317  12,951   60,999 

Total

           

 

853,984

 

 

 

Robert D. Velasquez (3)

          

Annual Incentive Plan

 2019   66,250  132,500  198,750       2020   68,237  136,475  204,712      

Time-Vested Stock Grant

  3/12/19        2,935  53,006   3/12/20        5,795  81,885 

Performance Grants, Cash Flow Objective

   

 

3/12/19

 

 

 

     

 

2,935

 

 

 

  

 

5,869

 

 

 

  

 

8,804

 

 

 

   

 

105,994

 

 

 

Michael Houston

          

Performance Milestone Grants

  3/12/20     0  31,873  34,535   450,368 

Price-Vested Units

  3/12/20     0  2,898  8,693   40,943 

Total

           

 

573,196

 

 

 

Michael Houston*

          

Annual Incentive Plan

 2019   80,765  161,530  242,294       2020   83,187  166,375  249,563      

Time Vested Stock Grant

  3/12/19        2,981  53,837   3/12/20        5,887  83,188 

Performance Grants, Cash Flow Objective

   

 

3/12/19

 

 

 

     

 

2,982

 

 

 

  

 

5,963

 

 

 

  

 

8,945

 

 

 

   

 

107,692

 

 

 

Performance Milestone Grants

  3/12/20     0  32,380  35,084   457,532 

Price-Vested Units

  3/12/20     0  2,944  8,831   41,594 

Total

           

 

582,314

 

 

 

 

*

Awards granted to Mr. Houston were forfeited when he left the Company.

1.

The annualnon-equity incentive award is based on the achievement of both quantitative and qualitative annual business objectives. The objectives vary based on the NEO’s responsibilities. For 2019,2020, based upon the percentage of achievement shown in the “Annual Performance-Based Incentives”Incentive Plan” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Mr. Bielli earned an incentive of $801,818;$778,066; Mr. Lyda $356,854;$282,018; Mr. McMahon 211,334;$163,057; Mr. Velasquez $151,760;$117,262; and Mr. Houston $184,008.$142,745.

2.

The equity incentive award program provides for performance unitmilestone grants, which vest upon achievement of a cash flow objectiveidentified performance objectives over a three-year time frame. The objective is basedPrice-vested units are also granted, which vest upon meeting targeted cash from operations within the Company’s five-year business plan. The three-year objective for these potentialachievement of specific stock awards is cash from operationsprice levels measured at the end of $29,970,000.2022. For additional details, see the “Equity Compensation” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 49.38.

3.

The performance milestone grants for each NEO are the equivalent of three years’ worth of grants. For Mr. Bielli his price-vested units and time vested stock grants are also the equivalent of three years’ worth of grants.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20192020 FiscalYear-End

The following table provides information on the current holdings of restricted stock, and performance unit awards of the NEOs. This table includes unvested stock grants, as well as performance share grants with performance conditions that have not yet been satisfied. Each equity grant for equity that was outstanding as of December 31, 20192020 is shown separately for each NEO. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing market price of Tejon stock as of December 31, 2019,2020, which was $15.98$14.45 per share. The market value as of December 31, 20192020 shown below assumes satisfaction of performance objectives at the target level of achievement.

 

 Stock Awards  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of

Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested

(#)

 

Market

Value of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units, or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested

(#)

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market of Payout
Value of

Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have

Not Vested

($)

  

Number of

Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested

(#)

 

Market

Value of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units, or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested

(#)

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market of Payout
Value of

Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Gregory S. Bielli:

        

Time-Based Stock Awards (1)

 25,951  414,697    159,182  2,300,180   

Performance Shares (2)

   73,745  1,178,445    117,870  1,703,221 

Milestone Performance Units (3)

   65,076  1,039,914    153,574  2,219,144 

Totals Gregory S. Bielli

  25,951   414,697   138,821   2,218,360 
    

Allen E. Lyda:

        

Time-Based Stock Awards (1)

 10,035  160,359    16,797  242,717   

Performance Shares (2)

   28,318  452,522    26,008  375,816 

Milestone Performance Units (3)

   24,150  385,917    63,145  912,445 

Totals Allen E. Lyda

  10,035   160,359   52,468   838,439 
    

Hugh McMahon:

        

Time-Based Stock Awards (1)

 7,714  123,270    12,682  183,255   

Performance Shares (2)

   21,996  351,496    19,855  286,905 

Milestone Performance Units (3)

   19,374  309,597    47,487  686,187 

Totals Hugh McMahon

  7,714   123,270   41,370   661,093 
    

Robert D. Velasquez:

        

Time Based Stock Awards (1)

 5,147  82,249    8,501  122,839   

Performance Shares (2)

   14,650  234,107    13,258  191,578 

Milestone Performance Units (3)

   12,869  205,647    31,873  460,565 

Totals Robert D. Velasquez

  5,147   82,249   27,519   439,754 

Michael R.W. Houston:

    

Restricted Stock Units (4)

 2,500  39,950   
    

Michael R.W. Houston *:

    

Time-Based Stock Awards (1)

 5,262  84,087    8,646  124,935   

Performance Shares (2)

   15,020  240,020    13,539  195,639 

Milestone Performance Units (3)

   13,275  212,135    32,380  467,891 

Totals Michael R.W. Houston

  7,762   124,037   28,295   452,154 

*

The above shares granted to Mr. Houston were forfeited when he left the Company

1.

Time-based stock award vesting occurs ratablyequally over three years from the grant date. Unvested time-based stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 20192020 were as follows:

 

Name  

2017 Time
Based

Grants

   

2018 Time

Based

Grants

   

2019 Time

Based

Grants

   

Total

Time-Based

Stock Awards

   

March
2018 Time
Based

Grants

   

March
2019 Time

Based

Grants

   

March
2020 Time

Based

Grants

   

Total

Time-Based

Stock Awards

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

 

3,616

 

  

 

7,385

 

  

 

14,950

 

  

 

25,951

 

  

 

3,693

 

  

 

9,229

 

  

 

146,260

 

  

 

159,182

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

 

1,341

 

  

 

2,880

 

  

 

5,814

 

  

 

10,035

 

  

 

1,440

 

  

 

3,876

 

  

 

11,481

 

  

 

16,797

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

 

1,077

 

  

 

2,265

 

  

 

4,372

 

  

 

7,714

 

  

 

1,133

 

  

 

2,915

 

  

 

8,634

 

  

 

12,682

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

 

715

 

  

 

1,497

 

  

 

2,935

 

  

 

5,147

 

  

 

749

 

  

 

1,957

 

  

 

5,795

 

  

 

8,501

 

Michael R. W. Houston

  

 

737

 

  

 

1,544

 

  

 

2,981

 

  

 

5,262

 

  

 

772

 

  

 

1,987

 

  

 

5,887

 

  

 

8,646

 

 

2.

Performance shares consist of shares that may vest during March 2020, 2021, and 2022 based upon achievement of a rolling three-year cash flow objective that is included within our five-year business plan.or the achievement of target stock appreciation levels. The shares shown are based upon reaching target levels of performance. Included in this number are the following shares vested in 20192020 and will be settled in 20202021 due to the achievement of the specified cash flow objective over the 2017 – 20192018-2020 period:

 

Name  

2020 Performance

Share Awards Not
Vested

   2021 Performance
Share Awards Not
Vested
   2022 Performance
Share Awards Not
Vested
   

Total Performance
Share

Awards

   

2021 Performance

Share Awards Not
Vested

   2022 Performance
Share Awards Not
Vested
   2023 Price-Vested
Awards Not
Vested
   

Total Performance
Share

Awards

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

 

21,692

 

  

 

22,153

 

  

 

29,900

 

  

 

73,745

 

  

 

22,153

 

  

 

29,900

 

  

 

65,817

 

  

 

117,870

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

 

8,050

 

  

 

8,640

 

  

 

11,628

 

  

 

28,318

 

  

 

8,640

 

  

 

11,628

 

  

 

5,740

 

  

 

26,008

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

 

6,458

 

  

 

6,793

 

  

 

8,745

 

  

 

21,996

 

  

 

6,793

 

  

 

8,745

 

  

 

4,317

 

  

 

19,855

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

 

4,290

 

  

 

4,491

 

  

 

5,869

 

  

 

14,650

 

  

 

4,491

 

  

 

5,869

 

  

 

2,898

 

  

 

13,258

 

Michael R. W. Houston

  

 

4,425

 

  

 

4,632

 

  

 

5,963

 

  

 

15,020

 

  

 

4,632

 

  

 

5,963

 

  

 

2,944

 

  

 

13,539

 

Actual shares earned in respect of the 2017-20192018-2020 three-year cash flow performance shares at an achievement level of 175.62%175.58%    (maximum shares earned at 150% of target), Shares vest in 2021 as follows:

 

Name 

2017-20192018-2020

Performance Grants Cash

from Operations

 

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

 

 

32,53833,230

 

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer/Former Chief Financial Officer

 

 

12,07512,960

 

Robert D. Velasquez SVP, Chief Financial Officer

 

 

6,4356,737

 

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

 

 

9,687

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

6,63810,190

 

 

3.

Milestone performance units consist of shares that may vest upon achievement of specific milestone objectives related to our residential development.real estate projects. For additional detail, see the “Equity Compensation” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 49.38.

Actual shares earned in respect of the 2017-2019 Performance Milestone Shares:

Name

2017-2019

Milestone
Performance Grants

Gregory S. Bielli, Chief Executive Officer

39,046

Allen E. Lyda, Chief Operating Officer/Former Chief Financial Officer

14,490

Robert D. Velasquez SVP, Chief Financial Officer

7,721

Hugh F. McMahon EVP, Real Estate

11,624

Michael R.W. Houston SVP, General Counsel

7,965

4. The RSUs granted to Mr. Houston will vest ratably over a three-year period beginning in May 15, 2017.

Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 20192020

The following table provides information for the NEOs regarding the value realized and the number of shares acquired upon the vesting of stock awards, before payment of any applicable withholding tax and broker commissions.

 

Name  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
   

Value

Realized on
Vesting

($)

   Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
   

Value

Realized on
Vesting

($)

 

Gregory S. Bielli

        

Time Grant

   11,377    208,768 

Performance Grants (1)

   22,063    404,856 

Supplemental Performance Grants

   90,000    1,461,600 

Time Grants

   85,052    1,259,557 

Performance Milestone Grants (1)

   39,046    551,720 

Performance Share Grants (1)

   32,538    459,762 

Total Gregory S. Bielli

   123,440    2,075,224    158,636    2,271,039 

Allen E. Lyda

        

Time Grants

   4,310    79,089    4,719    66,679 

Performance Milestone Grants (1)

   14,490    204,744 

Performance Share Grants (1)

   8,280    151,938    12,075    170,620 

Total Allen E. Lyda

   12,590    231,027    31,284    442,043 

Hugh F. McMahon

        

Time Grants

   3,434    63,014    3,666    51,801 

Performance Milestone Grants (1)

   11,624    164,247 

Performance Share Grants (1)

   6,643    121,899    9,687    136,877 

Total Hugh F. McMahon

   10,077    184,913    24,977    352,925 

Robert D. Velasquez

        

Time Grant

   4,413    80,979    2,441    34,491 

Performance Milestone Grants (1)

   7,721    109,098 

Performance Share Grants (1)

   2,277    41,783    6,435    90,927 

Total Robert D. Velasquez

   6,690    122,762    16,597    234,516 

Michael R.W. Houston

        

Restricted Stock Grants

   2,500    45,150    2,500    33,875 

Time Grant

   1,510    27,709    2,503    35,367 

Performance Milestone Grants (1)

   7,965    112,545 

Performance Share Grants (1)

   6,638    93,795 

Total Michael R. W. Houston

   4,010    72,859    19,606    275,582 

 

1.

The performance milestone and performance share grants that vested and settled during 20192020 were originally granted in 20162017 as part of the annual rolling three-year performance grant that is tied to the achievement of specified cash management objectives. The supplemental performance grants were originally issued in 2016 and were tied to the achievement of project related milestones within Mountain Village, Grapevine, and Centennial. For

additional detail regarding performance equity plans, see the “Equity Compensation” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 49.38.

Pension Benefits in Fiscal Year 20192020

The Company’s pension plan is atax-qualified retirement program that covers eligible employees of the Company. Effective January 31, 2007, the pension plan was frozen so that anyone hired on or after February 1, 2007, is not allowed to participate in the plan. An employee is eligible for normal retirement benefits on the first day of the month coinciding with or next following the employee’s Social Security retirement date. The amount of annual benefit, payable monthly, is based upon an employee’s average monthly compensation, which is based

upon the employee’s highest five consecutive calendar years of compensation out of the employee’s final ten years of compensation. The amount of the annual benefit payable monthly is 1.45% of the average monthly compensation, offset by .65% of the final average compensation not in excess ofone-twelfth of covered compensation, multiplied by total years of service (up to a maximum of 25 years). Effective April 2017, the Company froze the pension plan and SERP as it relates to the accrual of future benefits.

The supplemental executive retirement plan, or SERP, was established for the NEOs to replace any pension benefit the NEOs might lose due to theIRS-prescribed limit applicable totax-qualified plans. The SERP benefit is calculated based on the same formula as the defined benefit plan.

 

Name  Plan Name  Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
   

(1) Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit

($)

   

Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year

($)

   Plan Name  Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
   

(1) Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit

($)

   

Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year

($)

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

None

        

None

      

Allen E. Lyda

  

Defined Benefit Plan

  

 

30

 

  

 

   915,780

 

  

 

—  

 

  

Defined Benefit Plan

  

 

31

 

  

 

1,039,401

 

  

 

—  

 

  

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

  

 

30

 

  

 

1,048,059

 

  

 

—  

 

  

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

  

 

31

 

  

 

1,223,740

 

  

 

—  

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

Defined Benefit Plan

  

 

19

 

  

 

   389,932

 

  

 

—  

 

  

Defined Benefit Plan

  

 

20

 

  

 

   472,643

 

  

 

—  

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

None

        

None

      

Michael R. W. Houston

  

None

        

None

      

 

1.

The present value of the accumulated benefit is based upon the same assumptions and measurements that are used in the preparation of the audited financial statements for the current year. See Note 15, Retirement Plans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 for the valuation method and these assumptions.

Fiscal Year 20192020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The nonqualified deferred compensation plan allows the deferral of salary, bonuses, and vested restricted stock or performance units, and there are no limits on the extent of deferral permitted. The plan is available for the NEOs and directors of the Company. Each of the NEOs with deferred compensation has elected to defer payment until termination of employment, at which time payment will be made in a lump sum in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. The plan provides for withdrawals in the event of unforeseeable emergencies such as financial hardship from illness or accident, loss of property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the employee, as determined by the Company. A distribution based on an unforeseeable emergency is made only with the consent of the Company.

The decision by each NEO to defer future compensation and the distribution date of any deferral is determined at the end of each fiscal year for awards that may be received in the coming year. The Company does

not contribute to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of any NEO or director. Earnings from any cash contributed or stock that is converted to cash by a NEO or director are based upon the market return of the investment in which such officer or director directed his or her contribution. All holdings in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan are in the form of Company stock. No shares have been converted to cash within the plan.

 

Name  

Executive
Contribution in Last
FY

($)

   

Aggregate Earnings
(Loss) in Last

FY (2)

($)

   

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions ($)

   

Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE (1)

($)

   

Executive
Contribution in Last
FY

($)

   

Aggregate Earnings
(Loss) in Last

FY (2)

($)

   

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions ($)

   

Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE (1)

($)

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(6,117

  

 

—  

 

  

 

162,916

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(15,600

  

 

—  

 

  

 

147,318

 

Hugh F. McMahon

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Robert D. Velasquez

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Michael R. W. Houston

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

 

1.

All amounts reported in the aggregate balance at last fiscalyear-end were reported as compensation to the NEO in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years.

2.

Aggregate earnings in the last fiscal year are based on the change in price of the Company’s stock from the prioryear-end to December 31, 2019.2020. This factor is used because all investments within the nonqualified deferred compensation plan are held in Company stock.

Fiscal Year 20192020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Company has entered into an agreement with selected NEOs that provides for specified benefits upon a change in control and/or upon certain terminations outside of a change in control. A change in control is deemed to have occurred if (i) there is an acquisition by any person or group (excluding current ownership) of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company; (ii) the Company sells all or substantially all of its assets; or (iii) the Company merges or consolidates with another entity.

Benefits are payable to an NEO as a result of termination of employment in connection with a change in control if the NEO is terminated without cause during the two years after the occurrence of a change in control or the NEO is terminated prior to a change in control at the request of a third party who has taken steps to effect a change in control. The NEO will also receive benefits if he or she voluntarily terminates employment after a change in control if the NEO has been assigned substantial reductions in duties and responsibilities, received a reduction in base salary, or had an annual bonus opportunity eliminated or significantly reduced (i.e., a resignation for good reason). An NEO’s employment shall be deemed to have been terminated with cause if employment is terminated as a result of failure to perform his or her duties, willful misconduct or breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, or wrongful disclosure of confidential information. Change in control benefits include a continuation of base salary for a period of 36 months for the Chief Executive Officer and 30 months for the other NEOs, and a lump sum payment of three times the CEO’s average bonus and two andone-half times the NEO’sother NEOs’ average bonus for the previous three years. The NEOs are also entitled to receive a continuation of health and other insurance benefits over the salary continuation period. Each NEO also has the right to a three-month period to continue use of any perquisites he or she may have had prior to the change in control. For all NEOs unvested performance unit awards will vest at target achievement levels and other time-based awards will vest in full upon a change in control whether or not the NEO is terminated as outlined in the equity compensation plan. During the period of time described above during which benefits are to be received in connection with a change in control, the NEO must agree not to solicit any employees of the Company or disclose any confidential information related to the Company.

 

 Before Change in Control After Change in Control (1)    Before Change in Control After Change in Control (1)   
Name Benefit 

Termination

w/o Cause or

for Good Reason

($)

 

Termination

w/o Cause or

for Good Reason

($)

 

Change in
Control (1)

No Termination

($)

  Benefit 

Termination

w/o Cause or

for Good Reason

($)

 

Termination

w/o Cause or

for Good Reason

($)

 

Change in
Control

No Termination

($)

 

Gregory S. Bielli (3)

 Salary Continuation  2,025,000   Salary Continuation 1,050,000  2,100,000  
 Bonus – Target  2,025,000   Bonus – Target 1,312,500  2,625,000  
 Health Insurance  57,888   Health Insurance 28,944  57,888  
 Other Compensation (2)  140,544   Other Compensation (2) 146,482  146,482  
 Equity Compensation  2,633,057  1,916,354  Equity Compensation 1,502,078  6,222,545  290,806 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total Value  6,881,489  1,916,354  Total Value 4,040,004  11,151,915  290,806 

Allen E. Lyda (4)

 Salary Continuation 350,000  875,000   Salary Continuation 360,500  901,250  
 Bonus – Target 315,000  787,500   Bonus – Target 324,450  811,125  
 Health Insurance 19,296  48,240   Health Insurance 19,296  48,240  
 Other Compensation (2) 177,574  177,574   Other Compensation (2) 182,339  182,339  
 Equity Compensation 204,049  998,798  720,075  Equity Compensation 228,960  1,530,978  117,652 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total Value 1,065,918  2,887,112  720,075  Total Value 1,115,545  3,473,932  117,652 

Hugh F. McMahon (5)

 Equity Compensation  784,362  574,753  Salary Continuation  677,765  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  Bonus – Target  474,436  
 Total Value  784,362  574,753  Health Insurance  68,910  

Robert D. Velasquez (6)

 Equity Compensation  522,003  381,315 
 Other Compensation (2)  109,983  
 Equity Compensation  1,156,347  93,477 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total Value  2,487,441  93,477 

Robert D. Velasquez (5)

 Equity Compensation  774,982  61,586 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total Value  522,003  381,315  Total Value  774,982  61,586 

Michael R.W. Houston

 Salary Continuation  673,000   Salary Continuation  693,230  
 Bonus – Target  403,824   Bonus – Target  415,938  
 Health Insurance  68,910   Health Insurance  68,910  
 Other Compensation (2)  30,864   Other Compensation (2)  32,380  
 Equity Compensation  576,191  433,266  Equity Compensation  788,464  63,725 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total Value  1,752,828  433,266  Total Value  1,998,922  63,725 

 

1.

Restricted stock and performance units granted prior to 2019 vest upon a change in control. Beginning in 2019, all new stock grants provide for a double trigger vesting meaning that shares will vest in connection with a change in control only if such transaction is followed by a termination without cause or for good reason. For purposes of this table, it is assumed allnon-vested performance units and milestone units vest

immediately at the target level. The value for vesting of performance unit awards and milestone performance awards is the closing market price on the last business day of 20192020 of $15.98.

$14.45.

2.

“Other Compensation” consists of accrued and unused vacation and personal paid leave at the time of termination and, if the NEO has the right to use a Company vehicle prior to termination, the continuation of that benefit for a three-month period.

3.

Beginning in 2020, if Mr. Bielli is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause or voluntarily terminates employment for good reason, Mr. Bielli will receive an amount equal to eighteen months of base salary; an amount equal to eighteen months of target annual incentive; contribution of medical benefits for an eighteen month period; and any stock awards that were scheduled to vest during the calendar year of termination will be deemed vested as of date of termination.

4.

If Mr. Lyda is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause or voluntarily terminates employment for good reason, Mr. Lyda will receive an amount equal to one timestime his annual base salary; an amount equal to one timestime an average annual bonus over the last three years; continuation of medical benefits for aone-year period; any stock grants that vest at time of separation and that vest during the twelve-month period after separation.

5.

Beginning in 2020, Mr. McMahon will also be able to participate in the NEO change in Control Benefits as described above.

6.

Mr. Velasquez at this time only has change in control benefits related to outstanding stock awards per stock grant agreements.

Director Compensation in Fiscal Year 20192020

In 2019,2020, non-employee directors received 1,000 shares of stock and an annual retainer of $60,000 payable quarterly in the form of common stock or a combination of common stock and cash. Common stock is paid in arrears, based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares at each quarter end. In addition, the Chairman of the Board received an annual retainer of $25,000 payable in common stock, and the Chairman of each of the Audit, Compensation, Real Estate, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees received an annual retainer of $15,000 payable in common stock. Directors affiliated with a person or entity owning 10% or more of the Company’s total shares outstanding could elect to receive their entire annual retainer in cash. Directors are not paid any fees for board or committee meeting attendance. The Compensation Committee has approved stock retention guidelines fornon-employee directors; the target retention value is five times the value of the annual director retainer. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020 the Directors elected to take a 10% reduction in their annual retainer as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Name  

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash

($)

   

(1)

Stock Awards

($)

   

Total    

($)    

   

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash

($)

   

(1)

Stock Awards

($)

   

Total    

($)    

 

Robert A. Alter

  

 

—  

 

  

 

28,968

 

  

 

28,968    

 

Steven A. Betts

  

 

30,000

 

  

 

61,780

 

  

 

91,780    

 

  

 

27,750

 

  

 

57,016

 

  

 

84,766    

 

Jean Fuller

  

 

30,000

 

  

 

46,777

 

  

 

76,777    

 

  

 

27,750

 

  

 

42,010

 

  

 

69,760    

 

Anthony L. Leggio

  

 

30,000

 

  

 

61,780

 

  

 

91,780    

 

  

 

27,750

 

  

 

57,016

 

  

 

84,766    

 

Norman J. Metcalfe

  

 

30,000

 

  

 

71,772

 

  

 

101,772    

 

  

 

27,750

 

  

 

67,028

 

  

 

94,778    

 

Geoffrey L. Stack

  

 

—  

 

  

 

91,772

 

  

 

91,772    

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

84,774

 

  

 

84,774    

 

Daniel R. Tisch

  

 

—  

 

  

 

76,784

 

  

 

76,784    

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

69,770

 

  

 

69,770    

 

Michael H. Winer

  

 

—  

 

  

 

91,772

 

  

 

91,772    

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

57,016

 

  

 

84,766    

 

 

1.

The amounts reported reflect the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in 20192020 to each director. Please see Note 11, Stock Compensation Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192020 for additional information regarding the valuation of stock awards. The number of stock awards granted each year is determined on a quarterly basis by dividingone-fourth of the annual retainer by the closing stock price at the end of each quarter. At the end of 2019,2020, there were no unvested outstanding equity awards for our directors.

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our President and CEO and the annual total compensation of our median compensated employees:

The 20192020 annual total compensation of the median compensated of all our employees who were employed as of December 31, 2019,2020, other than our CEO, was $58,892;$61,913; our CEO’s 20192020 annual total compensation was $2,308,986$7,649,252 as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 55,46, and the ratio of these amounts was 39124 to 1. The median compensated employee was identified as one of our professional staff working in our ranch operationsaccounting department.

The pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. Pay elements that were included in the annual total compensation for each employee in determining the median compensated employee were:

 

Salary received in 20192020

 

Annual incentive payment received for performance in 20192020

 

Grant date fair value of stock awards granted in 20192020

 

Company provided vehicle and related maintenance, or auto allowance paid in 20192020

This is the same approach used to determine total annual compensation of our CEO reflected in the summary compensation table.

We determined the compensation of our median employee by calculating the annual total compensation including the compensation items just described for each of our employees. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, and we did not annualize the compensation for any employee not employed for a full year. We excluded from the determination of our median compensated employee any employee that left the Company during 20192020 and therefore was not employed on December 31, 2019.2020. Based upon the compilation of this data we determined the median compensated employee as identified above.

HEDGING AND PLEDGING

Under the Company’s policies, all employees, including executive officers and directors, are prohibited from engaging in any form of hedging transaction with respect to shares of Tejon common stock. In addition, our employees and directors are prohibited from purchasing stock on margin, borrowing against the Company’s stock, or pledging our securities.

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table lists the stock ownership of shareholders known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 26, 2020.24, 2021. As of March 26, 2020,24, 2021, we had 26,212,990[                ] shares of Common Stock outstanding. The table also provides the stock ownership as of the same date of all directors, each NEO named in the above Summary Compensation Table, and all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership (1)
 Percent
of Class (2)
   Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership (1)
 Percent
of Class (2)
 

TowerView LLC

460 Park Avenue, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10022

  

 

 

 

 

3,700,000

 

 

(3) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.12

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,815,000

 

 

(3) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.52

 

 

 

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

   

 

2,985,157

 

(4) 

 

  

 

11.39

 

 

   

 

2,217,477

 

(4) 

 

  

 

8.44

 

 

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road

Austin, TX 78746

   

 

1,534,863

 

(5) 

 

  

 

5.86

 

 

   

 

1,506,112

 

(5) 

 

  

 

5.73

 

 

BlackRock Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   

 

1,516,118

 

(6) 

 

  

 

5.78

 

 

   

 

1,524,569

 

(6) 

 

  

 

5.80

 

 

Royce & Associates LP

745 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10151

   1,496,410(7)   5.71   1,206,809(7)   4.59

Directors

      

Steven A. Betts

  

 

24,542

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

28,540

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Gregory S. Bielli

  

 

194,474

(10) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

247,892

(10) 

 

 

*

 

Jean Fuller

  

 

2,789

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

5,735

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Anthony L. Leggio

  

 

31,940

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

35,938

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Norman J. Metcalfe

  

 

61,576

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

66,276

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Rhea Frawn Morgan

  

 

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Geoffrey L. Stack

  

 

70,616

(9) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

76,561

(9) 

 

 

*

 

Daniel R. Tisch

  

 

4,841,625

(3) 

 

 

18.47

  

 

4,961,518

(3) 

 

 

18.88

Michael H. Winer

  

 

10,051

(11) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

14,049

(11) 

 

 

*

 

Executive Officers

      

Michael Houston

  

 

15,054

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

16,370

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Allen E. Lyda

  

 

149,363

(9) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

159,701

(9) 

 

 

*

 

Hugh F. McMahon, IV

  

 

26,250

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

34,097

(8) 

 

 

*

 

Joseph E. Rentfro

  

 

38,986

(9) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

45,177

(9) 

 

 

*

 

Robert Velasquez

  

 

15,080

(8) 

 

 

*

 

  

 

17,621

(8) 

 

 

*

 

All executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons)

  

 

5,482,346

 

 

 

20.91

All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)

  

 

5,709,475

 

 

 

21.68

 

*

Less than 1%.

(1)

In each case, the named shareholder in the above table has the sole voting and investment power as to the indicated shares, except as set forth in the footnotes below, and except that all options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units are held by directors and officers individually. For purposes of this table, “beneficial

 ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares that such person owns or has the right to acquire within 60 days. As a result, we have included in the “Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership” column shares of vested and unvested restricted stock granted to a beneficial owner and warrants granted to a beneficial owner. Such restricted stock has voting rights, irrespective of vesting. In addition, we have included restricted stock units that could possibly vest within 60 days of March 26, 2020,24, 2021, even though for any such restricted stock units shown to vest within that period, the beneficial owner would have to terminate his or her relationship with the Company.
(2)

For purposes of computing the “Percent of Class” column, any shares which such person does not currently own but has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 26, 202024, 2021 are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any person. Also included are restricted stock units that could possibly vest within 60 days of March 26, 2020,24, 2021, even though for any such restricted stock units shown to vest within that period, the beneficial owner would have to terminate his relationship with the Company.

(3)

TowerView LLC has sole voting power and investment power over its 3,700,0003,815,000 shares of common stock shown. Mr. Tisch has dispositional and voting authority over all shares owned by TowerView LLC. Mr. Tisch also has dispositional and voting authority over 1,087,507 shares owned by DT Four Partners LLC and 54,11859,011 shares owned directly. Information provided from Form 4 filed January 7, 2020.2021. Mr. Tisch’s address is c/o TowerView LLC, 460 Park Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(4)

A Schedule 13G/A filed on February 12, 20208, 2021 by The Vanguard Group (“VG”) with the SEC indicates that VG beneficially owns 2,985,157 shares, with sole power to vote or direct the voting of 19,6552,217,477 shares, shared power to vote or direct the voting of 1,20017,574 shares, sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 2,966,7022,186,898 shares, and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 18,45530,579 shares.

(5)

A Schedule 13G/A filed on February 12, 202016, 2021 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”) with the SEC indicates that Dimensional beneficially owns 1,534,8631,506,112 shares, with sole power to vote or direct the voting of 1,420,6551,412,604 shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,534,8631,506,112 shares.

(6)

A Schedule 13G/A filed on February 6, 2020January 31, 2021 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) with the SEC indicates that BlackRock beneficially owns 1,516,1181,524,569 shares, with sole power to vote or direct the voting of 1,463,8981,486,841 shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,516,1181,524,569 shares.

(7)

A Schedule 13G/A filed on January 29, 20202021 by Royce & Associates LP (“RA”) with the SEC indicates that RA beneficially owns 1,496,4101,206,809 shares, with sole power to vote, dispose, or direct the voting or disposition of 1,496,4101,206,809 shares.

(8)

The shares owned by Mr. Leggio include 31,94035,938 shares of stock that are held in his personal investment accounts. The shares owned by Mr. Metcalfe include 18,620 shares in his personal investment accounts and 42,95647,656 deferred restricted stock units that could possibly vest within 60 days of March 26, 2020.24, 2021. The shares owned by Mr. Betts include 23,23727,235 shares of stock in his personal investment accounts and 1,305 deferred restricted stock units that could possibly vest within 60 days of March 26, 2020.24, 2021. Ms. Fuller owns 2,7895,735 shares of stock, held in her personal investment account. Ms. Morgan owns no shares of stock as of March 24, 2021. The shares owned by Mr. McMahon include 26,25034,097 shares that are held in his personal investment account. The 15,08017,621 shares owned by Mr. Velasquez are held in his personal investment account. The shares owned by Mr. Houston include 15,05416,370 shares that are held in his personal investment account.

(9)

The shares owned by Mr. Stack include 30,338 shares in his personal investment accounts and 40,27846,223 deferred restricted stock units that could possibly vest within 60 days of March 26, 2020.24, 2021. The shares owned by Mr. Lyda include 139,168149,506 shares in his personal investment accounts and 10,195 deferred restricted stock units that could possibly vest within 60 days of March 26, 2020.24, 2021. The shares owned by Mr. Rentfro include 38,98645,177 shares in his personal investment accounts. The shares owned by each of Messrs. Stack, Lyda, and Rentfro in their personal investment accounts are held as community property concerning which the named persons and their respective spouses share voting and investment power.

(10)

Mr. Bielli owns 194,474247,892 shares in his personal investment accounts. Some of these shares are held by a family trust and the remainder are held as community property. In each case, he and his spouse share voting and investment power.

(11)

Mr. Winer retired from Third Avenue Management LLC (“TAM”) on February 28, 2018 and has had no affiliation with TAM since. As a portfolio manager of TAM, Mr. Winer was not permitted to personally own shares in the Company prior to his retirement. The shares owned by Mr. Winer include 10,05114,049 shares of stock that are held in his personal investment accounts.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Audit Committee of the Board has furnished the following report:

The Audit Committee reviewed Tejon Ranch Co.’s (the “Company’s”) financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process. The Company’s independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles.

In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB.PCAOB and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte & Touche LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditor its independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee has also considered whether Deloitte & Touche LLP’s provision ofnon-audit services to the Company is compatible with its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to in the preceding paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20192020 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Anthony L. Leggio (Chairman),

Geoffrey L. Stack,

Michael H. Winer, and

Norman J. Metcalfe

Members of the Audit Committee

OTHER MATTERS

Related Person Transactions

The Board follows certain written policies and procedures developed for the review and approval of all transactions with related persons, pursuant to which the Board reviews the material facts of, and either approves or disapproves of, the Company’s entry into any transaction, arrangement, or relationship, or any series thereof, in which (i) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year, or over the term of the contract; (ii) the Company is a participant; and (iii) any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or less than 10% beneficial owner of another entity).

The Board reviews all relationships and transactions in which both the Company and any related person are participants to determine whether such related persons have a direct or indirect material interest in such transaction. A “related person” is any executive officer, director, or director nominee of the Company, or any beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock, or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing. The Company discloses transactions in its proxy statements with related persons in accordance with Item 404 of RegulationS-K.

In the course of the Board’s review and approval or ratification of a related party transaction, the Board considers:

 

the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;

 

the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction;

 

the importance of the transaction to the related person;

 

the importance of the transaction to the Company;

 

whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director or executive officer or his or her ability to act in the best interest of the Company; and

 

any other matters the Board deems appropriate.

Any member of the Board who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberation or vote respecting approval or ratification of the transaction, provided that such director may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting that considers the transactions. There have been no related party transactions since the beginning of 2019.2020.

Financial Information

Both the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders and the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K (including the financial statements and financial statement schedules, but without exhibits) as filed with the SEC accompany this Proxy Statement.Both reportsmay be obtained without charge by calling (661)248-3000, or by written request to the Corporate Secretary,Tejon Ranch Co., P.O. Box 1000,Tejon Ranch, California 93243.

Notice of Internet Availability

You can now access the 20192020 Annual Report to Shareholders, the 20192020 Annual Report on Form10-K, and the Proxy Statement for the 20202021 Annual Meeting via the Internet at the following address:http://materials.proxyvote.com/879080.

The enclosed information has been provided to youshareholders of record to enable you to cast your vote in one of three convenient ways:ways before the Annual Meeting: (1) via the Internet, (2) by telephone, or (3) by returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. YouBeneficial owners should check their voting instruction form or Notice for how to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record may also attend the meeting online and vote during the Annual Meeting . If your shares are held in person.street name and your voting instruction form or Notice indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.proxyvote.com website, then you may vote at the Annual Meeting with the 16-digit access code indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice. Otherwise, shareholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker or other nominee (preferably at least 5 days before the annual meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. Whichever method you choose, you are encouraged to vote.

You can also eliminate the mailing of this information in the future by electing to receive this datathese materials through the Internet and by an email directing you to vote electronically. You can make this election as you vote your proxy via the Internet by providing your email address when prompted.

Communications with Directors

Any shareholder or other party interested in communicating with members of the Board, any of its committees, the independent directors as a group, or any of the independent directors individually may send written communications to Tejon Ranch Co., P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or via the “Contact” link on the Company’sweb-site,www.tejonranch.com. Communications received in writing are forwarded to the Board, committee, or any individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed, unless the communication is unduly hostile, threatening, or illegal, does not reasonably relate to the Company or its business, or is similarly inappropriate. The Corporate Secretary has the authority to discard or disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.

Shareholder Proposals for 20212022 Annual Meeting

Rule14a-8 Shareholder Proposals.Shareholder proposals to be presented at the 20212022 Annual Meeting, pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act, must be received by the Company no later than December 7, 2020,3, 2021, in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for that meeting. Such proposals must be submitted in writing to the principal executive offices of the Company at the address set forth on the first page of this Proxy Statement.

Advance Notice Nominations and Proposals.The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation requires that the Company be given advance written notice of shareholder nominations for election to the Company’s Board and of other matters which shareholders wish to present for action at an annual meeting of shareholders (other than matters included in the Company’s proxy materials in accordance with Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act, as discussed above). Such nomination or other proposal will be considered at the 20212022 Annual Meeting only if it is delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company at the address set forth on the first page of this Proxy Statement not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days prior to the meeting as originally scheduled. However, if less than 40 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to the shareholders, then the notice must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders was mailed, or the public disclosure was made. If shareholders approve the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation described under Proposal 4(b) above, the amendments would remove the deadlines described earlier in this paragraph from the Certificate of Incorporation, and the Board intends to approve amendments to the Bylaws to establish customary advance notice deadlines, which would apply beginning with the 2020 Annual Meeting. The Company intends to disclose these amendments, including the new deadlines, on theForm 8-K announcing the Bylaw amendments.made..

A shareholder’s notice to the Secretary must comply with the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.

Shareholders Sharing the Same Last Name and Address

To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate proxy materials to shareholders who may have more than one account holding the Company’s Common Stock but who share the same address, we have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, certain shareholders of record who have the same address and last name will receive only one copy of our annual report and proxy statement that are delivered until such time as one or more of these shareholders notify us that they want to receive separate copies. This procedure reduces duplicate mailings and saves printing costs and postage fees, as well as natural resources. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to have access to and utilize separate proxy voting instructions.

If you receive a single set of proxy materials as a result of householding, and you would like to have separate copies of our annual report and/or proxy statement mailed to you, please submit a request to our Corporate Secretary at Tejon Ranch Co., P.O. Box 1000, Tejon Ranch, California 93243, or by telephone at661-248-3000, and we will promptly send you what you have requested. You can also contact our Corporate Secretary if you received multiple copies of the annual meeting materials and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future, or if you would like to opt out of householding for future mailings.

Other Business

Management does not know of any matter to be acted upon at the 20202021 Annual Meeting other than those described above, but if any other matter properly comes before the meeting, the persons named on the enclosed proxy will vote thereon in accordance with their best judgment.

Shareholders are urged to sign and return their proxies without delay.

For the Board of Directors,

NORMAN J. METCALFE, Chairman of the Board

ALLEN E. LYDA, Chief Operating Officer, Assistant Secretary

ANNEX 1 – PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

Proposal 4(a)

Article VIII.Election of Directors

Section 1.Classified Board.The directors in office, or who shall take office upon the effectiveness of this Restated Certificate of Incorporation,Until the election of directors at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2023 Annual Meeting”), the directorsshall be divided into three classes: Class I, Class II, and Class III. Such classes shall be as nearly equal in number of directors as possible.If, at the time this Restated Certificate of Incorporation becomes effective, consistent with the provision that the three classes shall be as nearly equal in number of directors as possible, any directorship may be allocated to one of two or more classes, the directorship shall be allocated to that of the available classes whose term of office is due to expire at the latest date following such allocation. Each director shall serve for a term ending at the third annual shareholders meetingEach director elected at or prior to the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders shall be elected for a term expiring on the date of the third annual meeting of stockholdersfollowing the annual meeting at whichsuch director was elected; provided, however, that the directors first elected to Class I shall serve for a term ending at the annual meeting to be held in 1988, the directors first elected to Class II shall serve for a term ending at the annual meeting to be held in 1989, and the directors first elected to Class III shall serve for a term ending at the annual meeting to be held in 1990the director was elected. Each director elected at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders shall be elected for atwo-year term expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Each director elected at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders shall be elected for aone-year term expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting. At the 2023 Annual Meeting and each annual meeting of stockholders thereafter, all directors shall be elected for aone-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Article VIII, each director shall serve until hisor her term has expired and hisor hersuccessor is elected and qualified or until hisor herearlier death, resignation or removal.

At each annual election held, beginning with the 1988Prior to the 2023Annual Meeting,(1) the directors chosen to succeed those whose terms then expire shall be identified as being of the same class as the directors they succeed, unless, by reason of any intervening changes in the authorized number of directors, the Board shall designate one or more directorships whose term then expires as directorships of another class in order more nearly to achieve equality in the number of directors among the classes. When, (2) when the Board of Directors fills a vacancy resulting from the death, resignation or removal of a director, the director chosen to fill that vacancy shall be of the same class as the director heor shesucceeds, unless, by reason of any previous changes in the authorized number of directors, the Board shall designate the vacant directorship as a directorship of another class in order more nearly to achieve equality in the number of directors among the classes. If one or more Related Persons then exist, vacancies resulting from the death, resignation or removal of a Continuing Director can only be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining Continuing Directors or by (i) the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding shares of Voting Stock and (ii) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Disinterested Shares as to all Related Persons. Notwithstanding, (3) notwithstandingthe provision that the three classes shall be as nearly equal in number of directors as possible, in the event of any change in the authorized number of directors each director then continuing to serve as such will nevertheless continue as a director of the class of which heor sheis a member, until the expiration of hisor hercurrent term or hisor herearlier death, resignation or removal. If and (4) ifany newly created directorship or vacancy on the Board, consistent with the provision that the three classes shall be as nearly equal in number of directors as possible, may be allocated to one of two or more classes, the Board shall allocate it to that of the available classes whose term of office is due to expire at the earliest date following such allocation.

If one or more Related Persons then exist, vacancies resulting from the death, resignation or removal of a Continuing Director can only be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining Continuing Directors or by

(i) the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding shares of Voting Stock and (ii) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Disinterested Shares as to all Related Persons.

Section 2.Directors Elected by Preferred Stock. During any period when the holders of Preferred Stock or any one or more series thereof, voting as a class, shall be entitled to elect a specified number of directors by reason of dividend arrearages or other contingencies giving them the right to do so, then and during such time as such right continues (1) the then otherwise authorized number of directors shall be increased by such specified number of directors, and the holders of the Preferred Stock or such series thereof, voting as a class, shall be entitled to elect the additional directors so provided for, pursuant to the provisions of such Preferred Stock or series; (2) prior to the 2023 Annual Meeting,the additional directors shall be members of those respective classes of directors in which vacancies are created as a result of such increase in the authorized number of directors; and (3) each such additional director shall serve until the annual meeting at whichthehis or hertermof office of his classshall expire and until hisor hersuccessor shall be elected and shall qualify, or until hisor herright to hold such office terminates pursuant to the provisions of such Preferred Stock or series, whichever occurs earlier. Whenever the holders of such Preferred Stock or series thereof are divested of such rights to elect a specified number of directors, voting as a class, pursuant to the provisions of such Preferred Stock or series, the terms of office of all directors elected by the holders of such Preferred Stock or series, voting as a class pursuant to such provisions, or elected to fill any vacancies resulting from the death, resignation or removal of directors so elected by the holders of such Preferred Stock or series, shall forthwith terminate and the authorized number of directors shall be reduced accordingly.

Section 3.Removal. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding, any director, or the entire Board, may be removed from office at any time, but only (1) for cause, and (2) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Voting Stock (1) but, until the 2023 Annual Meeting, only for cause and (2) beginning at the 2023 Annual Meeting, with or without cause; provided, however, that, in either case, if a proposal to remove a director is made by or on behalf of a Related Person or by a director who is not a Continuing Director as to all Related Persons, then in additionto (1) and (2) abovethe affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Voting Stock, such removal shallalsorequire the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Disinterested Shares.

Proposal 4(b)

Article VIII.Election of Directors

* * * * *

Section 4.Notice of Shareholder Nominees. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of the Corporation shall be made only at a meeting of shareholders and only (1) by or at the direction of the Board or (2) by any shareholder of the Corporation entitled to vote for the election of directors at the meeting who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 4. Such nominations, other than those made by or at the direction of the Board, shall be made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than thirty (30) days nor more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting; provided, however, that in the event that less than forty (40) days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. For purposes of this Section 4, any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) of the original meeting whereby the meeting will reconvene within thirty (30) days from the original date shall be deemed for purposes of notice to be a continuation of the original meeting and no nominations by a shareholder of persons to be elected directors of the Corporation may be made at any such reconvened meeting unless pursuant to a notice which was timely for the meeting on the date originally scheduled. Such shareholder’s notice shall set forth: (i) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to

nominate for election orre-election as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); and (ii) as to the shareholder giving the notice (A) the name and address, as they appear on the Corporation’s books, of such shareholder, and (B) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by such shareholder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Section 4 shall be interpreted or construed to require the inclusion of information about any such nominee in any proxy statement distributed by, at the direction of, or on behalf of the Board.

The chairman of the meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that a nomination was not made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by this Section 4, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and the defective nomination shall be disregarded.

* * * * *

Article XIV.ShareholderStockholderProposals at Annual Meetings

Business may be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder only upon the shareholder’s timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than thirty (30) days nor more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting as originally scheduled;provided, however, that in the event that less than forty (40) days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. For purposes of this Article XIV, any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) of the original meeting whereby the meeting will reconvene within thirty (30) days from the original date shall be deemed for purposes of notice to be a continuation of the original meeting and no business may be brought before any reconvened meeting unless such timely notice of such businesses was given to the Secretary of the Corporation for the meeting as originally scheduled. A shareholder’s notice to the Secretary shall set forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting, (ii) the name and record address of the shareholder proposing such business, (iii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by the shareholder and (iv) any material interest of the shareholder in such business. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Article XIV shall be interpreted or construed to require the inclusion of information about any such proposal in any proxy statement distributed by, at the direction of, or on behalf of the Board.

The chairman of an annual meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that business was not properly brought before the meeting in accordance with the provisions of this Article XIV, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and any such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted.

Nominations of persons for election to the Board and the proposal of business (other than nominations of persons for election to the Board) to be considered by the stockholders may be made at a meeting of stockholders only in the manner set forth in the Bylaws of the Corporation.

APPENDIX A

ATTACHMENT A TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the independence of all directors and reports its findings to the Board of Directors. Based upon the report and the directors’ consideration, the Board of Directors determines which directors shall be deemed independent.

A director will be deemed independent if it is determined that he or she has no material relationship with the corporation, either directly or through an organization that has a material relationship with the corporation. A relationship is “material” if, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, it might reasonably be considered to interfere with the exercise of independent judgment. Ownership of stock of the corporation is not, in itself, inconsistent with a finding of independence. In addition, an Audit Committee member must also be independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange’s listing requirements for audit committees and the requirements set forth in Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and a Compensation Committee member must also be independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange’s listing requirements for compensation committees. The following specific standards are utilized in determining whether a director shall be deemed independent:

 

the director is not, and in the past three years has not been, an employee of Tejon Ranch Co. or any of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Tejon”);

 

an immediate family member of the director is not, and in the past three years has not been, employed as an executive officer of Tejon;

 

neither the director nor a member of the director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, affiliated with or employed by Tejon’s present or former (within three years) internal or external auditor;

 

neither the director nor a member of the director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of Tejon’s present executives serve on that company’s compensation committee;

 

neither the director nor a member of the director’s immediate family receives or has received more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from Tejon in the past three years, other than director and committee fees and pensions or other forms of deferred compensation for prior services (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

 

(a) the director is not a current partner or employee of a firm that is Tejon’s internal or external auditor; (b) the director does not have an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (c) the director does not have an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on the listed company’s audit; or (d) the director or an immediate family member was not within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on Tejon’s audit within that time;

 

the director is not, nor are any of the director’s immediate family members, currently an executive officer of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, Tejon for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

For purposes of thisAttachment A, an “immediate family member” means a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- andfathers-in-law, sons- anddaughters-in-law, brothers- andsisters-in-law, and anyone (other than an employee) who shares such person’s home.

LOGO


LOGOLOGO

Tejon Ranch Co. C123456789 Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! MR DESIGNATION A SAMPLE (IF ANY) You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. ADD 1 Votes submitted electronically must be received ADD ADD 2 3 by May 19, 2020 at 11:59 P.M., Eastern ADD 4 Standard Time. ADD 5 Online ADD 6 TEJON RANCH CO. ALLEN LYDA 4436 LEBEC ROAD TEJON RANCH, CA 93243
VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting—Go to www.investorvote.com/TRC or scanwww.proxyvote.com
Use the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territoriesInternet to transmit your voting instructions and Canada. Save paper, time and money! Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Sign up for electronic delivery at Please do not write outsideof information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the designated areas. www.investorvote.com/TRC 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345 IF VOTINGday before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting—Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021
You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL SIGN,
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
D42067-P52332 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOMTHIS PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A Proposals — ONLY
TEJON RANCH CO.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of nomineesnominee listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4a, 4b, and 4c. 4.
1. Election of Directors: +Directors
Nominees: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 01 - Gregory S. Bielli 02 - Anthony
1a. Jean Fuller 1b. Geoffrey L. Leggio 03 - Norman J. MetcalfeStack
1c. Michael H. Winer For Against Abstain For Against Abstain
2. Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the 3. Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation Company’s Independent Registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020 2021
3. Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation
4. AmendmentsAmendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation: 4a. AmendmentIncorporation to Declassifyincrease the Board and Provide for Annual 4b. Amendment to remove Certificatenumber of Provisions on the Electionauthorized shares of Directors Submission of Nominations and Other Business at Shareholder meetings, which would be Governed Exclusively by the Bylaws 4c. Amendments to make Non-Substantive Changes to the our Common Stock
NOTE: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any Certificate of Incorporation* adjournment therof *Proposal 4c. is conditioned on the approval of both Proposal 4a. and Proposal 4b. Therefore, unless shareholders approve both Proposal 4a. and Proposal 4b., Proposal 4c. will fail, even if it receives enough affirmative votes to pass independently. Proposal 4a. and Proposal 4b. are not conditioned on the approval of each other. Accordingly, each of Proposal 4a. and Proposal 4b. will pass if it independently receives enough affirmative votes. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. thereof.
Please sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND 1 U P X 4 5 7 9 9 6 MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + 037YQC(Joint Owners) Date


LOGOLOGO

20202021 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket 2020
2021 Annual Meeting of Tejon Ranch Co. Shareholders May 20, 2020,19, 2021, 9:00 am PST Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 1107 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 Upon arrival, please present this admission ticket and government-issued photo identification at the registration desk. a.m. PDT www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRC2021
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders To Be Held on May 20, 2020. 19, 2021.
The materialsNotice & Proxy Statement, 2020 Annual Report and Shareholder Letter are available at: www.edocumentview.com/TRC Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.investorvote.com/TRC IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. www.proxyvote.com.
D42068-P52332
Tejon Ranch Co. +
Notice of 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — May 20, 2020 19, 2021
The undersigned hereby appoints Norman J. Metcalfe and Gregory S. Bielli, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of Tejon Ranch Co. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the 20202021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held May 20, 202019, 2021 (the “2O2O“2021 Annual Meeting”), or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers that the undersigned would possess if present at the 20202021 Annual Meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned. If no such directions are made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals
2, 3, 4a, 4b, and 4c.4. If any other matters properly come before the 20202021 Annual Meeting, the persons named in this proxy will vote on such matters in their discretion. (Items
(Items to be voted appear on reverse side) C Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below.